You reminded of the thruter that used toothpicks and washers to make models of the twin towers to demonstrate how they could not collapse just by the crash and fire alone.
Besides the obvious failure of the materials he used not being appropriate for a model like that, he reported that the real amount of the materials used per floor were not available, (part of the conspiracy :rolleyes: ) never mind that they were. But the big trouble for him was that if that was the case, he never had good numbers to begin with, so any model that he made was in the end worthless.
As usual there was plenty of evidence we could find to show how wrong he was.
Good times, good times.
So you went running to the laughably incompetent ‘Pilots for Truth’ folks? The ones who haven’t a jumbo jet pilot to their name but have tried to tell actual commercial pilots how things are supposed to happen, truther-style.
My apologies to psikeyhackr. I thought he left us under a cloud years ago, but he is a current and active member. Again, I am sorry for my bumbling and inconsiderate error.
Those guys carrying those plane pieces weren’t taking them away, they were carrying them into the scene, to make it look like a plane hit. Plus how do we know when those pictures were really taken or where? They’re all actors. Obviously.
1/ It didn’t exist and anyone who says it did is in on the conspiracy. Or it has been sekritly flown to Omigodistan and broken up and melted down.
2/ They don’t exist. I’ve never met them. Anyone who says they have is an actor and in on the conspiracy. Or they were all sekritly killed and their bodies dumped somewhere. Or they were all in on the conspiracy and are now living under assumed names in Ferogsakistan
3/ They are all in on the conspiracy.
Really, this stuff is too easy. You can’t convince anyone of anything as soon as they believe that basically anything can be achieved in complete secrecy by the Guv’mint. Not much point trying. Mockery achieves as much and is more fun.
There used to be a 9/11 Pentagon conspiracy website run by some French guy which showed the shape of a Boeing 757 against a photo of the damage to the building. It fit absolutely perfectly. Of course, he concluded otherwise because his dumbass theory was that there should be a perfect 757 shaped hole, like something out of a Road Runner cartoon. But nonetheless the photo was absolutely damning. I linked to the photo ages ago in a thread on the subject but last time I checked the link was dead. Anyone know if it can still be found?
Oh, and as to aluminum being flimsy and airliners being built as lightly as possible, it’s all relative. It still has to lift many, many tonnes and pass through the air at 1000kph. You can’t do that with balsa and tissue.
I think this one: Sludge Report #127 - The Hunt For Flight 77 | Scoop News is either it or very like it. The heaviest damage matches the engines and fuselage, and there is light damage right out to the tips of the wings. It’s pretty much perfect.
The Pentagon was hit by a hijacked commercial airplane. But if you’re not buying that story … it doesn’t make any difference. It was still hit by a hijacked commercial airplane, regardless of what you believe.
Okay, folks: There are many,many fallacies running in this thread, and here at the Dope, I would expect to get thebasic facts straight.
So let me , finally, once and for all, tell you:
Please read the list carefully. Note that in addition to the Acme anvil, the Acme rocket-powered roller skates, and the Acme invisible paint, there is another weapon, clearly and openly used:
The Acme Do-it-Yourself Kit Remote Control Missile-Bombs!!!
So now we know how the 9\11 attacks were carried out.
That is all.
Mods, please close the thread.
