# What should have this Hospital done about a Racist demand in the NICU?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [February 15, 2013, 8:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429 "2013-02-15T20:14:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![huck](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b5a626/32.png) [@huck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/huck)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 3:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/21 "2013-02-16T03:48:37Z")

</div>

> [@Peanuthead](#):
>
> Just like the OP, I’m having a hard time with this too. Whose point of view are we taking? The hospital? - It’s a business with financial obligations. A lawsuit could devastate them. The father? (what happened to the mother?) It’s his child. The Nurse? Did she suffer any damages? (hey, that’s lawyer talk, right?) Or outsiders like us on th SDMB.  
> Speaking as an outsider SDer it is my opinion that the father of the child is a real asshole and has no business fathering children.

What lawsuit do you think the hospital avoided by banning black nurses from caring for this child?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZPG\_Zealot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/e47c2d/32.png) [@ZPG\_Zealot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZPG_Zealot)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 4:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/22 "2013-02-16T04:05:29Z")

</div>

> [@huck](#):
>
> But why would they be worried that he would take the baby out of the hospital and endanger its life? At least according to the article, all he had to do to insure that his baby was only tended by white nurses was to ask and show his tat.
> 
> Also, if he refused necessary treatment for his child based on the color of the nursing staff, the hospital could have (and should have) sought a court order appointing a rational temporary guardian for the child.
> 
> I would hope there is more explanation for the hospital’s reaction than reported in the story, but I’m missiing the basis for the conclusion that the hospital was protecting the child by honoring this request. Do you know something I don’t?

It has been my experience that white racists who display tattoes as a means of explanation, do not make particularly sound judgments on many occasions. Based on my experiences encountering skinheads, Neo-Nazis, KKK members etc., it would not be inconceivable for someone of that persuasion to try to remove a premature infant from a NICU if they were convinced it was the best decision regardless of what the hospital staff tried to do. It has also been my experience that such individuals tend to own firearms (please don’t turn this into a firearms or sterotyping debate). Plenty of hospitals don’t require patients relatives or visitors to walk through metal detectors. I am thinking this guy set off plenty of warning signals in someone’s opionion and they felt keeping the premature infant in the NICU trumped other issues. They choose the lesser of many evils.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZPG\_Zealot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/e47c2d/32.png) [@ZPG\_Zealot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZPG_Zealot)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 4:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/23 "2013-02-16T04:08:47Z")

</div>

> [@huck](#):
>
> What lawsuit do you think the hospital avoided by banning black nurses from caring for this child?

The one that happens when the father removes the child from NICU before it is reasonably safe to do so and the child dies. Trust me there is a lawyer somewhere that would take that case and argue that the hospital was somehow liable. Juries in the United States tend to find dead babies more pitiable than adults who have been discriminated against.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![huck](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b5a626/32.png) [@huck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/huck)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 4:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/24 "2013-02-16T04:22:02Z")

</div>

> [@ZPG\_Zealot](#):
>
> The one that happens when the father removes the child from NICU before it is reasonably safe to do so and the child dies. Trust me there is a lawyer somewhere that would take that case and argue that the hospital was somehow liable. Juries in the United States tend to find dead babies more pitiable than adults who have been discriminated against.

I’ll be sure and bounce that one off my fellow attorneys next time we’re in need of a good laugh (or cry, as we are more often tempted to do over the crazy things people believe about how the law works).

I’ve been a medical malpractice lawyer for over 20 years. I know you’ll be relieved to hear that your fears for the poor, vulnerable hospital are groundless.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackmannii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jackmannii/32/311_2.png) [@Jackmannii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackmannii)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 5:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/25 "2013-02-16T05:22:42Z")

</div>

> [@phouka](#):
>
> Hmmmm . . . trying to channel my mom here.
> 
> “Your infant’s nurse is a licensed professional and valued staff member. We do not assign staff members based on prejudice or racism. If you have an issue with this, you are welcome to have your child transferred to another hospital, but I can assure you that they have similar policies.”

That would go a long way towards solving the problem. But this sort of crap has come up elsewhere, as [in a Philadelphia case](http://www.minoritynurse.com/vital-sign/hospital%E2%80%99s-decision-honor-racist-demand-ignites-controversy) where a man demanded his pregnant wife not be seen by black caregivers (the hospital CEO later wound up apologizing and disciplinary action was reportedly taken against the idiot(s) who thought giving in to such a demand was reasonable.

When it happened in Seattle, the result was [a federal lawsuit](http://racismdaily.com/2011/05/28/seattle-hospital-workers-sue-over-patient-who-wanted-only-white-workers/).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MandaJo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ac91a4/32.png) [@MandaJo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MandaJo)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 10:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/26 "2013-02-16T10:40:16Z")

</div>

> [@ZPG\_Zealot](#):
>
> It has been my experience that white racists who display tattoes as a means of explanation, do not make particularly sound judgments on many occasions. Based on my experiences encountering skinheads, Neo-Nazis, KKK members etc., it would not be inconceivable for someone of that persuasion to try to remove a premature infant from a NICU if they were convinced it was the best decision regardless of what the hospital staff tried to do. It has also been my experience that such individuals tend to own firearms (please don’t turn this into a firearms or sterotyping debate). Plenty of hospitals don’t require patients relatives or visitors to walk through metal detectors. I am thinking this guy set off plenty of warning signals in someone’s opionion and they felt keeping the premature infant in the NICU trumped other issues. They choose the lesser of many evils.

I can see this. If the guy was scary–really scary–I can see deciding that placating him was more important than principle, especially post-Sandy Hook. Shooting up a NICU is kind of the final frontier in “absolutely appalling gun violence”, and it feels a lot less implausible now than it did six months ago. In a situation like that, if my instincts were screaming at me that there was something seriously off about someone (and flashing a swastika is pretty seriously off) I can see thinking more in terms of safety than principle, and fuck any lawsuits in either direction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smeghead](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f1d935/32.png) [@Smeghead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smeghead)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 12:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/27 "2013-02-16T12:08:08Z")

</div>

Do we know for sure that the hospital made no attempts to reason with this guy? The story gives the beginning (Nazi guy is a jerk) and the end (hospital rolls over), but I wonder what happened in between. It’s easy to infer from the story that that’s all there was to it, but so often in these news events, it later turns out that there were overlooked details that were relevant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tollhouse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e99b99/32.png) [@Tollhouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tollhouse)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 5:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/28 "2013-02-16T17:04:54Z")

</div>

Manda JO

I agree with this…I can see how a guy with that type of demeanor, rolling up his sleeve to show his swastika could feel to the medical staff a threat, and could suddenly go off, and do God knows what, maybe angrily start throwing stuff, turning over the babies incubators, and worse case pull out a gun. Presented with the immediate safety of the nicu infants, I think that took priority over an employee being offended by racial discrimination.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/29 "2013-02-16T18:27:28Z")

</div>

> [@alphaboi867](#):
>
> I’d be tempted to assure him only [Aryan] staff would treat his baby, and then page Dr Patel…

Love it!

When I was with Legal Aid, I had a client one summer who I could see was covered with Nazi and Aryan tattoos. He really had been wronged by a car dealership. To my amazement he actually seemed like a nice guy, but I was careful not to discuss politics or race relations with him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ExTank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/35a633/32.png) [@ExTank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ExTank)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 6:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/30 "2013-02-16T18:44:25Z")

</div>

> [@alphaboi867](#):
>
> I’d be tempted to assure him only Ayran staff would treat his baby, and then page Dr Patel.

> [@ZPG\_Zealot](#):
>
> It has been my experience that white racists who display tattoes as a means of explanation, do not make particularly sound judgments on many occasions. Based on my experiences encountering skinheads, Neo-Nazis, KKK members etc., it would not be inconceivable for someone of that persuasion to try to remove a premature infant from a NICU if they were convinced it was the best decision regardless of what the hospital staff tried to do.

**ZPG Zealot:** taking **alphaboi’s** comment under consideration, in your experience, how do skinheads/neo-Nazis/etc. deal with or otherwise relate to Indians?

ETA: I’m pretty much with **phouka** on this, maybe backed up by some burly Sheriff’s Deputies ready to escort racist-Dad off hospital grounds if necessary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![huck](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b5a626/32.png) [@huck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/huck)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 7:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/31 "2013-02-16T19:38:29Z")

</div>

Sorry for being cranky.

You know, I can see wanting to avoid an on-the-spot (the spot being the NICU presumably) confrontation with the crazy father. I’ve always been the person in my office called upon to deal with the loonies, and I’ve often found that the way to deal with crazies is to go with their program to the extent possible, or at least not argue with them.

But wat the hospital did (and of course we only have what’s int he article to judge) is a very big deal. Not only did they agree to overtly discriminate agaisnt their own employees, they agreed to and did rearrange their staffing along racial lines. NICU nurses are highly skilled professionals, hospitals are lean and mean these days, so just the staffing issue would be at best wildly inconvenient and at worst a danger to this kid and others in the unit. And what happens if this baby’s alarm goes off when the only white nurse on the unit is in the middle of a procedure with another child? Is the black nurse on duty supposed to ignore the Nazi’s child’s dropping oxygen saturations or arrhythmia?

She can’t, and if she did it would be a violation of the standard of good nursing care. So she’s not just been discriminated against but put in an untenable situation.

Hospitals have security and administration to deal with patient complaints and bad behavior. I’m quite sure that if the guy had demanded that his baby receive kool-ade instead of IV fluid the request would have been denied no matter how scared folks were by his tattoo. So I still don’t understand why the nurse manager or whoever made the decision went with this particular program.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tollhouse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e99b99/32.png) [@Tollhouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tollhouse)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 7:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/32 "2013-02-16T19:50:17Z")

</div>

Your right of course rhat discrimination is a big deal but possible violence or mayhem in a nicu even bigger deal

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ratatoskK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ratatoskk/32/2987_2.png) [@ratatoskK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ratatoskK)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 8:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/33 "2013-02-16T20:27:32Z")

</div>

Here’s my take:

1. The baby was in NICU (neonatal intensive care). The father was not in NICU.
2. The father went to the hospital administration (NOT the NICU) and made a demand.
3. His demand should have been politely refused.
4. If the father demanded to remove the baby from NICU, the police should have been called.
5. If the father tried to forcibly remove the baby from NICU, he would be guilty of child abuse.

I do understand not wanting to provoke a loony. But the hospital was unfair and broke the law.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![huck](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b5a626/32.png) [@huck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/huck)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/34 "2013-02-16T20:39:43Z")

</div>

> [@ratatoskK](#):
>
> Here’s my take:
> 
> 1. The baby was in NICU (neonatal intensive care). The father was not in NICU.
> 2. The father went to the hospital administration (NOT the NICU) and made a demand.
> 3. His demand should have been politely refused.
> 4. If the father demanded to remove the baby from NICU, the police should have been called.
> 5. If the father tried to forcibly remove the baby from NICU, he would be guilty of child abuse.
> 
> I do understand not wanting to provoke a loony. But the hospital was unfair and broke the law.

I couldn’t tell from the article where the demand and tat display took place. It says he approached hospital administration but it also says “the nurse in charge” which could mean the nurse manager on the unit.

But the facts alleged seem to be that the black nurse was reassigned from taking care of the baby, a sign was posted that black people should not care for the baby, and that this arrangement was continued for however long the baby was on the unit.

So it was not a middle-of-the-night on the NICU crisis averted by humoring the crazy man but a deliberate, discriminatory rearrangement of staffing over a period of time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Green\_Bean](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/green_bean/32/1760_2.png) [@Green\_Bean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Green_Bean)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 11:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/35 "2013-02-16T23:08:11Z")

</div>

> [@huck](#):
>
> I couldn’t tell from the article where the demand and tat display took place. It says he approached hospital administration but it also says “the nurse in charge” which could mean the nurse manager on the unit.  
> …  
> So it was not a middle-of-the-night on the NICU crisis averted by humoring the crazy man but a deliberate, discriminatory rearrangement of staffing over a period of time.

Some more details have been released in articles today. It seems that it was both.

From [http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/16/us/michigan-hospital-discrimination/index.html](http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/16/us/michigan-hospital-discrimination/index.html)

> [@](#):
>
> The man approached Battle, while she was caring for his child in the hospital’s neonatal intensive care unit, asking to speak to her supervisor, according to the complaint filed in January by Battle’s attorney.
> 
> She pointed the charge nurse in his direction.
> 
> The man, who is not named in the filing, allegedly showed her a tattoo that may have been “a swastika of some kind” and told her that he didn’t want African-Americans involved in his baby’s care.
> 
> The request, according to the lawsuit, made its way through management ranks, and was granted. Battle’s manager called her at home to tell her she would be reassigned – and why, the suit says.

While I haven’t found anything that definitively states this, it looks like the lawsuit is based on the staffing changes that were made _after_ the initial incident took place, rather than what was done to “humor the crazy man” at the moment of his request.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_apples\_fell](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ecb155/32.png) [@the\_apples\_fell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/the_apples_fell)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 11:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/36 "2013-02-16T23:25:53Z")

</div>

The hospital should have reassigned a different nurse to the child and given a reason for it so that no one else (including the nurse who had been reassigned) would have known what the reason was. That way they would have satisfied the idiot racist father’s demands (since they can’t exactly say “Go take your child elsewhere if you don’t like it”) and risk the baby’s health, and the nurse would not feel discriminated against.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Green\_Bean](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/green_bean/32/1760_2.png) [@Green\_Bean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Green_Bean)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 11:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/37 "2013-02-16T23:42:30Z")

</div>

The nurse did not FEEL discriminated against. She WAS discriminated against.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![phouka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/c5a1d2/32.png) [@phouka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/phouka)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 11:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/38 "2013-02-16T23:44:26Z")

</div>

> [@aceplace57](#):
>
> I wondered if a stern dressing down by a RN would do the trick. RN’s and teachers can be pretty formidable. 🙂
> 
> These days you just never know if the racist guy would slink away or escalate the situation.

Yes. Yes, they are, and my mom spent nearly 20 years as a nursing teacher, so it’s kind of double whammy. (Her response to a lawyer threatening to sue her school because they wouldn’t re-admit a twice flunked out student, saying that everyone has the right to make mistakes: "You look like you’re in your early forties. You’re carrying about thirty pounds more than you should. You smoke, and you’re in a stressful occupation. So, _when_ you have a heart attack, you’ll be okay with your nurse making a mistake in your treatment?)

The thing is, this isn’t the first time a hospital has ever had to deal with a creepy/scary/sketchy/hostile person. They have procedures and protocols in place for when they think a patient or family member might go off on them. There are panic buttons, security phones, code phrases, and signals that bring security _pronto_, and security is used to doing everything from pointedly occupying space nearby to putting restraints on a raving naked person in a drug-induced psychotic break.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_apples\_fell](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ecb155/32.png) [@the\_apples\_fell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/the_apples_fell)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2013, 11:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/39 "2013-02-16T23:54:04Z")

</div>

> [@Green\_Bean](#):
>
> The nurse did not FEEL discriminated against. She WAS discriminated against.

But the thing is in this case it is a delicate balance between a customer with a child who doing anything to disrupt its process of caregiving could be potentially a health risk, and between discriminating against an employee. That is why they should have reassigned the nurse without giving any indication as to why, so she never would know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cazzle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cazzle/32/75_2.png) [@Cazzle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cazzle)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2013, 12:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429/40 "2013-02-17T00:03:58Z")

</div>

Doesn’t the hospital have a duty of care to its employees? Isn’t assigning an African American nurse to a Neo Nazi who has already expressed hostility towards people of that race a potential risk to that nurse?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-have-this-hospital-done-about-a-racist-demand-in-the-nicu/650429.md?page=3)
