# What should the bounds be for Sexual topics on the SDMB?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [May 13, 2004, 12:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943 "2004-05-13T12:57:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bienville](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/4bbf92/32.png) [@bienville](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bienville)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 12:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/1 "2004-05-13T12:57:03Z")

</div>

Hey, Y’all  
I’m not angry. I’ve got nothing to flame about. Just looking for some feedback 'cause I’ve pissed **Czarcasm** off again and I want to make sure everyone knows I want to be friends and play nice and all.

I’m sure most people who have been visiting these boards for a while have noticed that **IMHO** can tend to get very sexually explicit. As I write this there are 4 Threads on the front page of IMHO that are sexually explicit in nature. With pure intentions and the highest sociological goals I began [this Thread](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=255970), just interested in how enthusiasticly this may at times affect some members of the SDMB Community.

I thought it was a valid topic but I got a quick lockdown. So I’m intersted to know people’s thoughts on just how far it too far in terms of discussion of personal sexual topics.

I know **Czarcasm** was particularly perturbed by my suggestion of links- but I did use a “joking!” smilie just like he advised me to make a habit of doing [just yesterday (Reply #38)](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=255632) :smack:

Anyway, just want to reiterate that I ain’t angry, but this is the second day in a row that I’ve pissed **Czarcasm** off- and I can’t post an apology in a locked Thread, so I’ve come here. ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![World\_Eater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/f04885/32.png) [@World\_Eater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/World_Eater)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 1:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/2 "2004-05-13T13:03:40Z")

</div>

What was the technical reason behind closing that thread?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boo\_Boo\_Foo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e274bd/32.png) [@Boo\_Boo\_Foo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boo_Boo_Foo)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 1:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/3 "2004-05-13T13:13:33Z")

</div>

Man… people can say whatever they want. Doesn’t bother me one little bit. They can talk about whatever gender preference they want, or whatever sexual preference they want… I couldn’t care less.

If I see a thread which interests me, I’ll open it.

If I see a thread which is obviously sexual in nature, they bore the crap out of me and I move on.

Would that it were that more people had the same philosophy instead of trying to force THEIR moral certitudes on to others.

You wanna talk dirty? Go ahead. I’ll be in the General Debates Forum talking about how the US lost the Vietnam War. As they say… different strokes for different folks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lord\_Ashtar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ea924/32.png) [@Lord\_Ashtar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lord_Ashtar)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 1:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/4 "2004-05-13T13:40:41Z")

</div>

I have to admit, I think the thread you started was pretty stupid. But I probably would have ignored it anyway.

I seem to remember **Czarcasm** saying things before along the lines of, “This is not the Penthouse forums. Take your fantasies elsewhere.” This seems right in character for him, at least to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SmackFu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/53a042/32.png) [@SmackFu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SmackFu)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 1:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/5 "2004-05-13T13:50:35Z")

</div>

The only bound is that the thread title shouldn’t make me shudder every time I read it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BMalion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e274bd/32.png) [@BMalion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BMalion)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 1:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/6 "2004-05-13T13:58:17Z")

</div>

> [@SmackFu](#):
>
> The only bound is that the thread title shouldn’t make me shudder every time I read it.

Hear! Hear!

The thread titled "Pan-fried… "

was the most loathsome thread title I’ve ever seen, made me retch, and I used to watch John Water’s films, too.

Please keep your thread titles oblique and discreet, you scum out there. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MikeG](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mikeg/32/4329_2.png) [@MikeG](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MikeG)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/7 "2004-05-13T14:00:15Z")

</div>

> [@SmackFu](#):
>
> The only bound is that the thread title shouldn’t make me shudder every time I read it.

You mean unless it’s one of those good, “I need a cigarette/nap/shower now” shudders, right? 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AncientHumanoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ancienthumanoid/32/278_2.png) [@AncientHumanoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AncientHumanoid)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 2:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/8 "2004-05-13T14:11:46Z")

</div>

So… did anyone else get off to the closed thread? [typing with sticky fingers]

WHAT!?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Annie-Xmas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecc23a/32.png) [@Annie-Xmas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Annie-Xmas)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 2:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/9 "2004-05-13T14:34:28Z")

</div>

While I’m not going to search for it while at work, I remember a Mod locking a sexual thread with the idea of “If it’s like a Medical Discussion, it’s okay. If it’s like a Penthouse Forum letter, it’s not.”

As for the other post of **bienville** ’s, name calling is stupid and juvenile.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jayjay](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jayjay/32/6765_2.png) [@jayjay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jayjay)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 2:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/10 "2004-05-13T14:43:48Z")

</div>

Huh-huh-huhuh…he said “bound”…

I know, I know. Where’s a fish-slap smiley when you really need it? 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bienville](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/4bbf92/32.png) [@bienville](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bienville)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 3:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/11 "2004-05-13T15:03:21Z")

</div>

> [@Lord Ashtar](#):
>
> I have to admit, I think the thread you started was pretty stupid.

I don’t entirely disagree. That’s why I’m not upset about the Lockdown- it really wasn’t any real loss, I think we’ll all do just fine without it. But I do, truly, want to honor community standards, so that’s why I’ve started this Thread- and I appreciate the feedback.

I said I don’t _entirely_ disagree. The significant difference is that rather than use the word “stupid”, I’d have all used the word “silly”. There’s no shortage of silly Threads here and I admit to being particularly fond of silly Threads in particular.

I really do feel badly when I see that something I have posted in fun ends up offending someone. If I were to offend someone with a sentiment that I actually feel very strongly about, and that I feel like I expressed exactly as I had intended to, then I’d stand by it and say “to heck with y’all”.

But, when I’m being playful or gently teasing, I do feel quite badly when someone believes I was trying to be either disrespectful or hurtful. **Annie-Xmas** is still offended by a remark that was already followed by an apology, an apology that was accepted by all parties concerned. (Annie, I hope you read the entire exchange).

I don’t want to check my sense of humor at the door (even if it’s not universally appreciated), because I feel that the vast diversity of personality types really makes these boards special. However, If I’m not communicating myself effectively- or if I’m just completely out of bounds- I’d like to try to do better. In person so much meaning is added by gestures and tone of voice. On Messageboards we lose those elements.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![booka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e0b2c6/32.png) [@booka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/booka)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 3:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/12 "2004-05-13T15:13:15Z")

</div>

> [@bienville](#):
>
> Hey, Y’all  
> … I thought it was a valid topic but I got a quick lockdown. So I’m intersted to know people’s thoughts on just how far it too far in terms of discussion of personal sexual topics.
> 
> I know **Czarcasm** was particularly perturbed by my suggestion of links- but I did use a “joking!” smilie just like he advised me to make a habit of doing [just yesterday (Reply #38)](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=255632) :smack:
> 
> Anyway, just want to reiterate that I ain’t angry, but this is the second day in a row that I’ve pissed **Czarcasm** off- and I can’t post an apology in a locked Thread, so I’ve come here. ☹

I really don’t give a shit one way or the other. This is just a message board where people come to fiddle around.

Hmmm. Wait a minute. Maybe I do care a tiny bit. Let’s see: a post asking if people have to get themselves off after reading another post?

I guess I would have to say that you should just shut the fuck up and go do something else besides typing. It’s just stupid. Jesus GOD - why does this have to be spelled out for you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/13 "2004-05-13T15:52:25Z")

</div>

It’s frankly quite amazing that any post on the SDMB would be sexually arousing in any way — even if the poster were a young, nubile princess, reading as she writhes quietly in a bath of rose water, the droplets clinging to her nimble, buoyant breasts until they fall away into rivulets that trickle down the curves of her tight, bronze body, gathering in a warm, shallow pool at her navel, where her finger teases them as she giggles, bites her swollen red lip, and shares her morning fantasy with the world.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kalhoun](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/3bc359/32.png) [@Kalhoun](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kalhoun)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 3:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/14 "2004-05-13T15:55:54Z")

</div>

Okay. I’m going to spell it out.

When you start discussing things that other people say that get you all tingly inside, IT COULD EMBARRASS THE PERSON IN THE THREAD YOU WERE REFERRING TO. We don’t want to do that. We’re supposed to be nice to each other around here (with some exceptions, of course).

Sigh…this is becoming somewhat tiresome.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stonebow](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ed8c4c/32.png) [@Stonebow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stonebow)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 4:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/15 "2004-05-13T16:08:32Z")

</div>

_groans_

so, **Kalhoun** , was it good for you?  
😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![World\_Eater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/f04885/32.png) [@World\_Eater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/World_Eater)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/16 "2004-05-13T16:10:05Z")

</div>

> [@Libertarian](#):
>
> It’s frankly quite amazing that any post on the SDMB would be sexually arousing in any way — even if the poster were a young, nubile princess, reading as she writhes quietly in a bath of rose water, the droplets clinging to her nimble, buoyant breasts until they fall away into rivulets that trickle down the curves of her tight, bronze body, gathering in a warm, shallow pool at her navel, where her finger teases them as she giggles, bites her swollen red lip, and shares her morning fantasy with the world.

Damn you \*_Lib_. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![World\_Eater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/f04885/32.png) [@World\_Eater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/World_Eater)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 4:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/17 "2004-05-13T16:12:53Z")

</div>

Nobody even suggest I typed that with one hand.

\<waving fist\> 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![World\_Eater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/f04885/32.png) [@World\_Eater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/World_Eater)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 4:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/18 "2004-05-13T16:15:36Z")

</div>

Waving fist in threatening manner, not in jerk off motion. 😃

God, these sexual innuendo loops are tough to break out of.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/19 "2004-05-13T16:26:43Z")

</div>

> [@World Eater](#):
>
> Waving fist in threatening manner, not in jerk off motion. 😃
> 
> God, these sexual innuendo loops are tough to break out of.

Yes, well, we do notice that you are only waving _one_ fist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Bravo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_bravo/32/493_2.png) [@Johnny\_Bravo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Bravo)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2004, 4:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943/20 "2004-05-13T16:34:34Z")

</div>

> [@World Eater](#):
>
> God, these sexual innuendo loops are tough to break out of.

Just be careful you don’t break it _off_.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-should-the-bounds-be-for-sexual-topics-on-the-sdmb/244943.md?page=2)
