Oh the horrors! :-o
Good point. Any random digit distribution satisfies the requirement, as do some nonrandom ones (like the Champernowne constant mentioned above).
Disjunctive is the property that makes the premise true by definition.
Oh the horrors! :-o
Good point. Any random digit distribution satisfies the requirement, as do some nonrandom ones (like the Champernowne constant mentioned above).
Disjunctive is the property that makes the premise true by definition.
Minor nitpick, but the Champernowne constant is normal.
(One concrete example of a non-normal, disjunctive number in base b is given by taking the Champernowne constant in base (b + 1) and identifying two of its digits to get a base b digit-sequence where everything shows up, but one digit appears twice as often as the others).
Reading all of this, I become idly curious as to whether the endless iteration of pi could be correlated in any way to the GATC sequences in DNA, with some kind of scheme for having the four letters represent all ten digits by, say, changing their value depending on their neighbors.
You could simply assign a letter to multiple digits, like so:
G=1,2,3 T=4,5 C=6,7,8 A=9,0
Granted the base-pairs wouldn’t have equal representation though, unless you assigned each letter two digits and rotated the 9 and 0 between them consecutively.
Or just express pi in base 4.
True dat.
Or take two decimal digits at a time, assigning 25 digit-pairs to each of GATC.