# What unrelated diseases have an inverse correlation

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-unrelated-diseases-have-an-inverse-correlation/724582>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [July 8, 2015, 3:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-unrelated-diseases-have-an-inverse-correlation/724582 "2015-07-08T15:35:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 10\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![astorian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ad7895/32.png) [@astorian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/astorian)\
**Post date:** [July 10, 2015, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-unrelated-diseases-have-an-inverse-correlation/724582/21 "2015-07-10T19:17:08Z")

</div>

Breast cancer is more common among women who have never given birth… which would suggest that women who have largely or complete abstained from intercourse with men (nuns and lesbians, for instance) probably have higher instances of breast cancer than most women.

But at the same time, they’d have far fewer (if any) STDs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Some_Call_Me.Tim)\
**Post date:** [July 10, 2015, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-unrelated-diseases-have-an-inverse-correlation/724582/22 "2015-07-10T22:54:43Z")

</div>

I don’t mean to be contrary, but isn’t the question as stated an oxymoron?

No two things that are inversely correlated can be unrelated, by definition. If two things have an inverse correlation, they are by definition related. Inversely. That’s what correlation _means_.

I sort of get that gist that maybe we’re talking (though never so stated) of a _causal_ relationship, but I really think this question would need to have ‘unrelated’ better defined in order to get factual answers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Blue\_Blistering\_Barnacle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blue_blistering_barnacle/32/3386_2.png) [@Blue\_Blistering\_Barnacle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Blue_Blistering_Barnacle)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2015, 4:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-unrelated-diseases-have-an-inverse-correlation/724582/23 "2015-07-11T04:21:50Z")

</div>

> [@Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](#):
>
> I don’t mean to be contrary, but isn’t the question as stated an oxymoron?
> 
> No two things that are inversely correlated can be unrelated, by definition. If two things have an inverse correlation, they are by definition related. Inversely. That’s what correlation _means_.
> 
> I sort of get that gist that maybe we’re talking (though never so stated) of a _causal_ relationship, but I really think this question would need to have ‘unrelated’ better defined in order to get factual answers.

I guess I read the question to mean “otherwise unrelated”.

I think OP was trying to exclude things like cowpox/smallpox.

But your way works, too. Just ignore all posts after OP. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZurBob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/71e660/32.png) [@ZurBob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZurBob)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2015, 7:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-unrelated-diseases-have-an-inverse-correlation/724582/24 "2015-07-11T07:10:27Z")

</div>

Try to turn the semantics radar off for a moment. Some of you are so busy arguing  
over the identification of a tree (the meaning of a single word), you are missing  
the forest (the intent of the question).

I understand the necessity of clear and unambigous questions and answers here, but  
sometimes in the quest for such, some of you tend to be over zealous in dismissing  
another’s post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dtilque](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/d6d6ee/32.png) [@dtilque](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dtilque)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2015, 7:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-unrelated-diseases-have-an-inverse-correlation/724582/25 "2015-07-11T07:48:04Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Note that it’s _not_ sickle cell, the disease, that inversely correlates with malaria, it’s having the _sickle cell genetic trait_. Sickle cell disease, itself, [makes one more vulnerable to malaria](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle-cell_disease#Malaria_chemoprophylaxis).

Right. It’s the best known example of [heterozygote advantage](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterozygote_advantage). There are others, as discussed on that page.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MmeRose](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ee7513/32.png) [@MmeRose](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MmeRose)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2015, 6:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-unrelated-diseases-have-an-inverse-correlation/724582/26 "2015-07-11T18:00:37Z")

</div>

> [@Blue\_Blistering\_Barnacle](#):
>
> I wonder if sex ratios are taken into account? Females are more likely to get rheumatoid arthritis (and many other autoimmune disorders). Males are more likely to get schizophrenia. This could cause an apparent inverse correlation.

Oddly, though, when men get the “women’s diseases” like breast cancer and MS, they usually get far more severe cases.

Anecdotal, I know. Maybe because nobody considers the diagnosis until the diseases are advanced?

The Unifying Diagnosis is one holy grail of medicine. Medical students have to be reminded that you can get ticks AND fleas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wesley\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wesley_clark/32/20581_2.png) [@Wesley\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wesley_Clark)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2015, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-unrelated-diseases-have-an-inverse-correlation/724582/27 "2015-07-11T23:13:25Z")

</div>

> [@Blue\_Blistering\_Barnacle](#):
>
> I guess I read the question to mean “otherwise unrelated”.
> 
> I think OP was trying to exclude things like cowpox/smallpox.
> 
> But your way works, too. Just ignore all posts after OP. 😉

My question was more about diseases with unknown etiologies and if the underlying processes could be understood by looking at diseases with inverse correlations. Schizophrenia could have an immune or autoimmune component due to the correlation with RA.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![No\_umlaut\_for\_U](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ea5d25/32.png) [@No\_umlaut\_for\_U](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/No_umlaut_for_U)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2015, 1:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-unrelated-diseases-have-an-inverse-correlation/724582/28 "2015-07-12T01:44:30Z")

</div>

Didn’t they use infection with malaria (Malariotherapy) against syphilis in the days before antibiotics? I would think there would be an inverse correlation there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jeff\_Lichtman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jeff_lichtman/32/1531_2.png) [@Jeff\_Lichtman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jeff_Lichtman)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2015, 6:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-unrelated-diseases-have-an-inverse-correlation/724582/29 "2015-07-12T06:24:19Z")

</div>

Some time ago I read that Hansen’s disease (AKA leprosy) and tuberculosis are caused by closely-related bacteria, and that populations that have one of the diseases tend not to have the other.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2015, 8:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-unrelated-diseases-have-an-inverse-correlation/724582/30 "2015-07-12T08:05:47Z")

</div>

Does HIV and later AIDS provide protection from anaphylaxis?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-unrelated-diseases-have-an-inverse-correlation/724582.md?page=1)
