What was Irish cuisine like before the introduction of the potato?

I just got the feeling that the newspaper was trying to excuse the failure to provide for the starving with this fact.

Sardinia turned her back to the sea after several waves of seafaring marauders. For centuries Sardinians wouldn’t go to sea, wouldn’t fish, wouldn’t even eat fish.

But they would eat this. WTF, Sards?

In Jared Diamond’s Collapse he mentions that the Greenland Norse did not eat fish (no fish bones found in Norse garbage dumps), despite their ancestral fish-loving roots in Iceland and Norway, and there being plentiful stocks of fish in and around the island. “No one knows why”, but Diamond speculates that something so mundane as perhaps one of the first leaders of Greenland getting violently ill after a fish meal started a tradition where Greenlanders as a group decided fish were “bad”.

Indeed. Most fish is found several miles off the coast and in very deep waters. At the time the typical Irish fishing boat wasn’t able to haul nets in such deep water and wasn’t all that great at coping with bad weather. So many fishermen, stranded on the beach, ended up seling their boats & nets to pay for food.
As is noted in many history books, including the ones used to teach school kids, there was food in the country, some fish, shellfish, corn, meat, but people didn’t have the cash to pay for it.

Except that, if anything, those are contemporaneous commentary from a Radical POV. Punch had a distinctly Radical slant in the 1840s and many of the cartoons featured on that page are by John Leech, the magazine’s star cartoonist who is generally considered to have reflected that slant. That is why, as Pushkin notes, so many of the cartoons also criticise the government. Moreover, Richard Doyle’s featured cartoons are equally hostile to the Irish and, instead of being a Radical, he was actually a devout Roman Catholic.

As the repeal of the Corn Laws had been as much - or even more so - the proposed whig and Radical solutions as the Peelite one, the sense in England that the Irish were being ungrateful for what had been done for them crossed party lines.

I dimly remember reading (and I may remember incorrectly) that part of the reason why the Irish weren’t big fish eaters was because of restrictions imposed by the English on the Irish using boats??

From The Great Hunger: Ireland, 1845-1849, by Cecil Woodham-Smith:

That sound you hear is my stomach growling. I’m 1/16 Irish, and I looooove potatoes…

Is it fair to demand a citation for a comment that begins:

I’ve heard similar comments about Katrina on other message boards; “Everytime government intervenes in this sort of thing it only makes things worse…it encourages people to look to the government to solve their problems for them, instead of standing on their own two feet…private charities should be left to solve the problems…if they were too stupid or helpless to leave New Orleans in time it’s their own fault…”

I’m not demanding a citation as you put it, I’m interested if there’s more basis to the statement. Some may get their nipples hard over contests to see who can be right the most times or get the highest post count; I just wanted to know was if there was a source of the conjecture, for the sake of learning, especially as I do a bit of research in food and cooking history as a hobby.

It was indeed speculation, but I’ve since found this:

The rest of the article is also very pertinent to the OP, since it’s called “Food and Eating in Ireland before the Potato”, although it lacks detail, and disagrees with us about the fish and seafood thing.