# What were you THINKING?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [October 13, 2023, 7:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532 "2023-10-13T19:36:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 32

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2023, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/621 "2023-12-31T22:01:48Z")

</div>

> [@kaylasdad99](#):
>
> I can certainly endorse that; at the same time, I’m uncomfortable characterizing such beliefs with a term carrying connotations of “_like unto the David Dukes among us_.”

David Duke doesn’t just hold biggoted beliefs; he isn’t even just a bigot. He is a white supremacist.

That’s like saying that I can’t call my friend tall because that’s a term carrying connotations of Shaquille O’Neal or that a millionaire isn’t rich because that’s a term carrying connotations of Bill Gates.

You don’t have to be LITERALLY HITLER to hold racist beliefs. You can be a nice person, even a nice person who is aware of these issues and opposes racism overall.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![InternetLegend](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/internetlegend/32/13154_2.png) [@InternetLegend](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/InternetLegend)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2023, 10:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/622 "2023-12-31T22:10:00Z")

</div>

I think it’s really valuable to recognize that prejudice and bigotry are things we all struggle with (or should, at least). It’s kind of like when you’re trying to reprimand a child; there’s a distinction between a person who’s done a bad thing and a person who **is** bad.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrAtoz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@MrAtoz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrAtoz)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2023, 10:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/623 "2023-12-31T22:45:12Z")

</div>

> [@thorny\_locust](#):
>
> I’m reading a book. I don’t visualize precisely, but I do get some sense of what the characters look like. And – I default visualize them as white unless the author explicitly tells me otherwise; and occasionally even if the author does.

I learned this the hard way one time. I take part in a writing group–we share our writing with each other, critique it, etc. One of our participants was writing a novel, and only identified one of the main characters as being black about 10 chapters in. I made a note of that, and suggested that she ought to have established him as being black earlier. She pointed out, “I never said anything that suggested he wasn’t black. I never mentioned any race at all. You just automatically assumed that he was white.”

And of course, she was absolutely right. I had been treating white as the default character type. Learning opportunity for me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2023, 11:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/624 "2023-12-31T23:10:33Z")

</div>

> [@MrAtoz](#):
>
> . One of our participants was writing a novel, and only identified one of the main characters as being black about 10 chapters in.

Didn’t Heinlein do that once?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrAtoz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@MrAtoz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrAtoz)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2023, 11:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/625 "2023-12-31T23:26:10Z")

</div>

It seems like I’ve heard that. I’m not a great reader of Heinlein, so I can’t say for sure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thorny\_locust](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thorny_locust/32/431_2.png) [@thorny\_locust](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thorny_locust)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2023, 11:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/626 "2023-12-31T23:39:50Z")

</div>

> [@MrAtoz](#):
>
> I learned this the hard way one time. I take part in a writing group–we share our writing with each other, critique it, etc. One of our participants was writing a novel, and only identified one of the main characters as being black about 10 chapters in. I made a note of that, and suggested that she ought to have established him as being black earlier. She pointed out, “I never said anything that suggested he wasn’t black. I never mentioned any race at all. You just automatically assumed that he was white.”
> 
> And of course, she was absolutely right. I had been treating white as the default character type. Learning opportunity for me.

Wanna know what got me? Significantly worse than that.

I came across an essay by Ursula LeGuin, in which she objects to a screen adaptation of A Wizard of Earthsea: objecting to it in significant part because, as she points out, Ged isn’t white. (I don’t think I’m finding quite the version I remember reading; but [here’s one similar](https://slate.com/culture/2004/12/ursula-k-le-guin-on-the-tv-earthsea.html).)

And as I read that I realized – LeGuin straight out tells you in the book that he isn’t white. Very clearly; and more than once. And, despite having read that book multiple times – I had been imagining him as white anyway. My back-of-the-head assumption had been so strong that it overwhelmed the evidence of my eyes.

That was very much a whack upside the head. And I needed that whack.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrAtoz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@MrAtoz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrAtoz)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2023, 11:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/627 "2023-12-31T23:44:51Z")

</div>

I seem to recall something similar in _The Hunger Games_–people objecting to certain characters being cast with black actors, even though they were described in the books as having “dark skin.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolfpup](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolfpup/32/10618_2.png) [@wolfpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfpup)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2023, 11:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/628 "2023-12-31T23:51:29Z")

</div>

> [@MrAtoz](#):
>
> One of our participants was writing a novel, and only identified one of the main characters as being black about 10 chapters in. I made a note of that, and suggested that she ought to have established him as being black earlier. She pointed out, “I never said anything that suggested he wasn’t black. I never mentioned any race at all. You just automatically assumed that he was white.”

The default assumption isn’t that an unknown character is white, whether in fiction or in real life. The default assumption is that an unknown character is like oneself. This is how God came to be cast as a white dude sporting a long flowing beard.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spice\_Weasel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spice_weasel/32/5435_2.png) [@Spice\_Weasel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spice_Weasel)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2024, 12:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/629 "2024-01-01T00:05:09Z")

</div>

It gets even more complicated with fantasy races. I made a fantasy world where the most privileged people are brown. There’s also a race that’s whitish, and then there’s a race that’s extremely white to the point of looking otherworldly, and whether that race is the oppressed or the oppressor depends largely on historical context. There’s a whole lot of intersectionality going on. And a lot of racism, truth be told.

So someone once called me out for describing one of my characters as brown when I introduced her. “Is that even relevant?”

Yes? Race matters in this society, it’s something that would be noticed. Would it be noticed by that specific guy at that time? Less sure. But her brownness would certainly be a nationality and cultural marker, placing her firmly as a member of the aristocracy.

It’s just really hard for me to imagine a world where you didn’t notice the color of other people’s skin, and have some kind of preconceived idea about them. That’s why I try to write characters who aren’t stereotypes in hopes of pushing back on the human need to compartmentalize everyone. (Because that particular aristocrat is actually in full-throated rebellion against her own country, and is using her privilege as a public platform for spreading revolutionary ideals.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Bravo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_bravo/32/493_2.png) [@Johnny\_Bravo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Bravo)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2024, 12:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/630 "2024-01-01T00:12:16Z")

</div>

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> The default assumption is that an unknown character is like oneself.

Maybe if the viewer/reader is white, cisgender, heterosexual, and some flavor of Christian. Otherwise, no, I don’t think people default to assuming that characters are the same as them.

This was demonstrated in an experiment that was used as evidence in _Brown v Board of Education._ Black children clearly expressed a belief that white dolls were better than black dolls, and even _identified more strongly_ with the white dolls.

> **[Kenneth and Mamie Clark Doll - Brown v. Board of Education National...](https://www.nps.gov/brvb/learn/historyculture/clarkdoll.htm)**

We’re strongly shaped by the society around us, and that includes what we come to view as a “default” state of being.

Personally, I’ve never once in my life assumed a character was Jewish absent explicit evidence. That would be a pretty silly thing to do and would alter or even ruin quite a lot of narratives.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2024, 12:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/631 "2024-01-01T00:25:59Z")

</div>

That was then. Now is, or can be, different.

My wife’s daughter works as a full-time foster parent running a group home. She’s pasty white. Most but not all of her many many kids, both past and present, are black. All the vast supply of kids’ books she has are a mix of all black characters and a wide mix of characters such as white, black, Latin, east Asian, south Asian. It’s a real UN in those latter books. Even though everybody is depicted as an ordinary American growing up in ordinary America. Its just normal that every page has black, brown and sometimes a white face. The whites aren’t a majority or a default. They’re just one of a dozen equal choices.

We just had Christmas. All the kids of an age to receive a doll or an action figure got one whose general skin tone & features agreed with the kid it was given to. They were not hard to locate. This is mainstream stuff now.

The kids generally don’t care what color their housemates are; everybody is a _de facto_ brother or sister. That’s how you raise largely post-racial kids. They’re certainly aware there’s a difference. They just don’t think it matters.

Sadly they’re going to grow up into a world where their attitudes are ahead of the curve. But we can move that way as a society if we want to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2024, 12:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/632 "2024-01-01T00:29:52Z")

</div>

Despite my better (?) judgment, I want to give my $0.02 about @Beckdawrek , from the perspective of a proud member of her fan club.

Change can be hard. Change can be hard when we’re young and – in all ways – agile. Change can be hard when we live and breathe in a milieu of diversity.

I strongly empathize with Beck’s serious health challenges. In my own situation, virtually All Available Resources go to that. Period.

Low rung on [**Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs).

Some of those resources likely get recruited in adapting to change. What if they just ain’t there?

She also seems to have a rather big, rather close, slightly complicated family. Resource suck, Part Deux.

And my _sense_ is that she’s lived in a relatively rural part of the South for a long time (forever)? Stereotypically, that’s a mighty narrow demographic.

Old habits die hard. Everybody we see on a daily basis is either a whole lot like ourselves, or … has to hide the differences.

But add me to the list of people who think Beck’s got a heart of gold and gets just a wee bit of the benefit of the doubt at most every turn.

Some _truly_ great, and truly SD-esque discussion, here. I also want to h/t @DSeid . You’re crushing it 😉

Oh, and my dear friend – retired surgeon whose childhood was _a lot_ like yours – gets his hackles up if I _ever even imply_ that there was some privilege involved in his success. Kudos to you for recognizing yours – not at the expense of acknowledging your own damned hard work – and for having a strong sense of [**noblesse oblige**](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/noblesse%20oblige) – rather than toxic entitlement – come out of it.

Happy New Year to you/us/(they \<grin\>) all!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smapti](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/smapti/32/17938_2.png) [@Smapti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smapti)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2024, 12:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/633 "2024-01-01T00:34:00Z")

</div>

> [@Alessan](#):
>
> Didn’t Heinlein do that once?

IIRC, we don’t find out that Johnny Rico is Filipino until almost the very end of Starship Troopers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SunUp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ea5d25/32.png) [@SunUp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SunUp)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2024, 1:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/634 "2024-01-01T01:00:59Z")

</div>

In _Space Cadet_, Sublieutenant Peters is introduced as part of the crew of the P.R.S. _Aes Triplex_, the ship on which the protagonist takes his cadet cruise. It’s some forty pages later (in my edition) when a character refers to him as “black as the ace of spades”.

That’s the most… jarring?.. example from Heinlein’s work for me, as I will readily admit that when I read it as a teenager, my mind’s eye saw a “generic white guy” in the Peters role until I hit that description.

The female main character (sorta it’s complicated) in _I Will Fear No Evil_ was written by Heinlein who put up two pictures on the wall to visualize his heroine - one of a black woman, one of a white woman. I’ve never had the desire to go back and reread the book to see how his characterizations may have been influenced by this.

IIRC the eponymous heroine of the book _Friday_ is dark-skinned; this is less a surprise from the text than it is from seeing the cover, which (at least in the early edition I have) depicts a quite pale young woman.

A few more classic examples include protagonists Rod Walker and Johnny Rico being black and Filipino, respectively.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spice\_Weasel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spice_weasel/32/5435_2.png) [@Spice\_Weasel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spice_Weasel)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2024, 1:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/635 "2024-01-01T01:09:21Z")

</div>

Happy New Year, everyone. Here’s to being better than we once were.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/bb73d2/32.png) [@Baker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baker)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2024, 1:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/636 "2024-01-01T01:14:29Z")

</div>

In one of Heinlein’s juveniles, _Tunnel in the Sky_, a student who was amond those taking the survivial test was black. I think her name was Caroline

_Space Cadet,_ mentioned already, is an example of religious diversity as well. When the cadet’s oath is taken they make their oaths affirming “This by the name I hold most sacred” and it’s mentioned the wide variety of languages and respnses used.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2024, 1:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/637 "2024-01-01T01:27:44Z")

</div>

> [@DSeid](#):
>
> > [@BigT](#):
> >
> > It’s why I tend to make longer posts when conveying negativity. I know that short posts tend to come off as angry ⁢
> 
> I get that you prefer long form as a stylistic choice. Fair that. I personally prefer brevity and give myself demerits when I get long winded. I am sometimes too lazy to write less though. [Insert obligatory Twain quote.] ⁢

My point is that it’s not (always) a stylistic choice. In this case, I think your post being longer is why your statement comes off less accusatory than @EinsteinsHund did, despite being the same sort of thing.

One liner posts that are negative have a tendency to come off as more negative than the writer intended.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EddyTeddyFreddy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eddyteddyfreddy/32/18796_2.png) [@EddyTeddyFreddy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EddyTeddyFreddy)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2024, 2:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/638 "2024-01-01T02:34:12Z")

</div>

> [@thorny\_locust](#):
>
> I’m reading a book. I don’t visualize precisely, but I do get some sense of what the characters look like. And – I default visualize them as white unless the author explicitly tells me otherwise; and occasionally even if the author does. It’s very far in the back of my head and I need to make the front of my head pay attention to it in order to not do it – and I need to do that in each specific case, because that seems to be as much learning as the back of my head has been able to absorb on that subject. At least so far.

Oh, my, yes, same here. Comes of growing up white middle-class in white suburban New England at a time when the faces you saw on TV were almost all white and any minorities were in a subservient and subsidiary role, with men and women standardized to their expected roles. There’s been a helluva lot of revamping my brain has needed over the years.

One sci fi/fantasy author I enjoy has a recurring character in one of her series whose pronouns are they/them, with a name and appearance that are also not gender-specific, and everyone simply rolls with it as perfectly natural. First time I read that, I had to stop and ratchet up my mind to accept it. Now it’s no big deal, and they’re one of my favorite characters – but I had to make the effort to go with it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Bravo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_bravo/32/493_2.png) [@Johnny\_Bravo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Bravo)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2024, 2:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/639 "2024-01-01T02:52:03Z")

</div>

The Imperial Radch series by Ann Leckie is a great sci-fi series that’s also really challenging (in a good way) due to the way she approaches gender and identity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2024, 2:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/640 "2024-01-01T02:54:26Z")

</div>

> [@EddyTeddyFreddy](#):
>
> Comes of growing up white middle-class in white suburban New England at a time when the faces you saw on TV were almost all white and any minorities were in a subservient and subsidiary role, with men and women standardized to their expected role

The thing that’s hard for us to understand in the hefty number of white Americans for which that is still their everyday reality. You don’t have to get too far out of major cities before it’s still nearly all white. Except for that small section of the mid-sized town they don’t go to.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532.md?page=31)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532.md?page=33)
