# What will be in Trump’s “Large, Detailed, but Irrefutable REPORT?”

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Tags:** trump\
**Created:** [August 16, 2023, 5:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663 "2023-08-16T17:31:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pardel-Lux](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pardel-lux/32/20182_2.png) [@Pardel-Lux](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pardel-Lux)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 8:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/41 "2023-08-16T20:06:40Z")

</div>

Indeed, the correct title is _disgraced twice impeached four times indicted (and counting) former president_.  
Please excuse the lack of random capitalization.

Coining the word _tetraindicted_ would seem appropiate by now.  
ETA: Soon we might expand that with more new words: pentaindicted, hexaindicted…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frodo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/frodo/32/302_2.png) [@Frodo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frodo)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 8:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/42 "2023-08-16T20:08:42Z")

</div>

I also doubt that he would chose that exact terminology to describe himself, but you never know, the man is nothing if not a strickler for correct terminology…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frodo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/frodo/32/302_2.png) [@Frodo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frodo)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 8:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/43 "2023-08-16T20:13:14Z")

</div>

> [@Pardel-Lux](#):
>
> ETA: Soon we might expand that with more new words: pentaindicted, hexaindicted…

Perhaps just leave it as “Poliindictec”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pardel-Lux](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pardel-lux/32/20182_2.png) [@Pardel-Lux](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pardel-Lux)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 8:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/44 "2023-08-16T20:14:51Z")

</div>

I don’t like the look of the double “i”, make it polyindicted and I agree.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 8:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/45 "2023-08-16T20:30:04Z")

</div>

There won’t be one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/46 "2023-08-16T20:34:43Z")

</div>

Bottle kids!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Akaj](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/akaj/32/145_2.png) [@Akaj](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Akaj)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 8:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/47 "2023-08-16T20:37:01Z")

</div>

> [@Pardel-Lux](#):
>
> Large, Detailed _ **BUT** _ Irrefutable? Why _but_? Just because some report is large (that means: he has not written it himself and he will not read it) and detailed (that means: he would not understand it if he were to read it. Ah, the complexity…!) it does not follow that it is not irrefutable.

Think like a MAGAt: You distrust complex things or documents with lots of words. So if Trump is offering up a detailed document with lots of words, you might be inclined to doubt its effectiveness. All those details and words might give those Demonrats something to refute!

That’s why he has to reassure you that it’s irrefutable, despite its length and level of detail.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Buck\_Godot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/buck_godot/32/6573_2.png) [@Buck\_Godot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Buck_Godot)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 8:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/48 "2023-08-16T20:46:35Z")

</div>

> [@Horatius](#):
>
> Right now he’s got some intern cutting and pasting…
> 
> …
> 
> That’s assuming he publishes anything at all. “Nothing at all” is certainly the way I’d bet based on his track record.

That exactly matches my guess. Either nothing, or just a rehash of the debunked theories that have already been tried and tossed out of court. I will lean in the direction of something over nothing based on the fact that he set a specific date and time in the next week. If he has no intention of following through he usually just goes with the vague “two-weeks”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Horatius](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/horatius/32/3572_2.png) [@Horatius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Horatius)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 9:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/49 "2023-08-16T21:07:38Z")

</div>

> [@bobot](#):
>
> Bottle kids!

“Holy shit that was a lot of indictments!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xizor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xizor/32/102_2.png) [@xizor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/xizor)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/50 "2023-08-16T21:10:03Z")

</div>

> [@DWMarch](#):
>
> I’d assume he’ll produce nothing and say his lawyers are not letting him speak the truth.

Which is why he needs more MONEY from the Magats to hire BETTER lawyers that will let him reveal the REPORT. Because next they will come and block YOUR REPORTS, and he is the only one standing in their way!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kelby2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ebca7d/32.png) [@Kelby2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kelby2)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/51 "2023-08-16T21:14:07Z")

</div>

> [@kenobi\_65](#):
>
> I’m remembering the press conference that Trump had just prior to being inaugurated as president in 2017, where he stood next to a table that had big stacks of documents, and claimed that the documents contained details of him turning over all control of his business dealings to his sons, and removing any conflicts of interest for him as president.
> 
> Of course, he had staff members who kept anyone from actually examining those stacks of documents, which strongly suggested that they were merely props.
> 
> So, my prediction for Monday is a similar large stack of “reports,” which he claims is massive evidence, but which no one will actually be allowed to examine.
> 
> [https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/313907-trump-didnt-allow-reporters-to-see-documents-detailing-split/](https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/313907-trump-didnt-allow-reporters-to-see-documents-detailing-split/)
> 
> [https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/01/trumps\_pence01112017getty.jpg](https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/01/trumps_pence01112017getty.jpg)

Ah, I’d forgotten about this.

Your take gets my vote.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kelby2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ebca7d/32.png) [@Kelby2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kelby2)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/52 "2023-08-16T21:16:09Z")

</div>

> [@Horatius](#):
>
> Man, the look of confusion on Eric’s face there…“Wait, I thought those were just blank pages? Why is no one else confused? Maybe I just read them wrong?”

Or, “Damn, he makes lying look so _easy_.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/53 "2023-08-16T21:17:29Z")

</div>

> [@Horatius](#):
>
> the look of confusion on Eric’s face

…is the baseline default look for Eric’s face, to be fair.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolfpup](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolfpup/32/10618_2.png) [@wolfpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfpup)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 9:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/54 "2023-08-16T21:33:50Z")

</div>

My vote is with those going with “will contain regurgitated crap that’s already been torn apart by courts and fact-checkers”, plus possibly some newly invented crap if the sycophant writing the “Large, Detailed, but Irrefutable REPORT” can think of any.

My hope is it earns the Orange Menace a few more lawsuits and maybe a charge of contempt of court. Someone should ask him whether the “Large, Detailed, but Irrefutable REPORT” will be presented as evidence for the defense in his upcoming Georgia trial, since it’s so Irrefutable that the judge would immediately end the trial, apologizing to the Orange Menace with tears in his eyes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Locrian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/locrian/32/14146_2.png) [@Locrian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Locrian)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 9:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/55 "2023-08-16T21:35:53Z")

</div>

If Mike Lindell isn’t involved in the presentation of this REPORT, I’d be surprised. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2023, 10:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/56 "2023-08-16T22:10:56Z")

</div>

Most likely: A stack of blank papers that he insists are the proof, followed by all of the heads of the Murdoch hydra spewing out “Now that he’s publicly released the conclusive proof, everyone should forget about it, and the Demon-Rats are only not reading it because they know it’ll show how evil they are”.

Next-most likely: He’ll say nothing at all, never even mention it. The Murdoch hydra will alternate between spewing the same thing as in the first case, and “Report? What report? He never said he was going to make a report, why is everyone lying about the Great One?”.

After that, the word-salad thing. But nobody on the Right will even try to interpret what he “meant to say”; they’ll just pretend that it makes sense and only an idiot wouldn’t know what it meant (IIRC, this was the overwhelming response to “covfefe”).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr\_Paprika](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr_paprika/32/3042_2.png) [@Dr\_Paprika](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr_Paprika)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2023, 1:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/57 "2023-08-17T01:00:36Z")

</div>

There are several ways Trump could write a hundred page REPORT.

1. He could repeat the phrase “lorem ipsum” a lot. Or “I am the very model of a modern major general”. Or “Can’t get enough of that Sugar Crisp”. Or the words to “John Jakob Jingleheimer Schmidt”.

2. He could use 35 point font in Innocent White crayon.

3. He could allot the same space to each judge, known officials and his co-conspirators. Calling each CORRUPT and SCOFFLAW.

4. He could attach appendices detailing various fast food menus, the lyrics to “Fight For Your Right to Party” and “Sabotage”, recipes involving Georgian favourites “peanuts, peaches, pecans and pimiento cheese”, an unadulterated map of potential hurricane paths, photocopies of a “get out of jail free” and “second prize in beauty contest” official certificates, a signed permission note from the Dos Equis “Most Interesting Man In The Workd”, or the spine and soul of Lindsey Graham.

5. Photographs proving that at appropriate times, fingers were crossed.

6. A tape of Trump denying wrongdoing regarding the Georgia election, “being the one who dealt it” or being Individual One who “stole the cookie from the cookie jar”.

7. A printout showing verbatim torrents of personal support from Breitbart, X, Twitter, The Purchased Formerly Known As 🧛‍♂️, Trump Social or Threads Bare.

8. Fan letters from Giuliani, Graham and Gregor Clegane, Vlad, Kim Jong, Hun Sen and Mitch.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2023, 1:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/58 "2023-08-17T01:05:25Z")

</div>

> [@Dr\_Paprika](#):
>
> Or “I am the very model of a modern major general”.

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/k-LTRwZb35A/maxresdefault.jpg "A VERY STABLE GENIUS - Randy Rainbow Song Parody") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-LTRwZb35A)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atamasama](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/atamasama/32/12961_2.png) [@Atamasama](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atamasama)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2023, 1:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/59 "2023-08-17T01:08:33Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> But nobody on the Right will even try to interpret what he “meant to say”; they’ll just pretend that it makes sense and only an idiot wouldn’t know what it meant (IIRC, this was the overwhelming response to “covfefe”).

[The Emperor’s New Clothes](https://andersen.sdu.dk/vaerk/hersholt/TheEmperorsNewClothes_e.html)

Just imagine a report instead of an outfit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Morris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peter_morris/32/359_2.png) [@Peter\_Morris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_Morris)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2023, 1:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663/60 "2023-08-17T01:21:26Z")

</div>

I think it will be a list of all the debunked theories he has been touting since the election.

- dead people voting
- voting machines switching votes
- ballots counted multiple times
- more votes than voters
- big dumps
- etc.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-will-be-in-trump-s-large-detailed-but-irrefutable-report/988663.md?page=4)
