# What would you do if money were literally no object

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-would-you-do-if-money-were-literally-no-object/957616>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [January 11, 2022, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-would-you-do-if-money-were-literally-no-object/957616 "2022-01-11T23:29:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 102

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Limmin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/f04885/32.png) [@Limmin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Limmin)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2022, 3:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-would-you-do-if-money-were-literally-no-object/957616/102 "2022-01-23T15:46:52Z")

</div>

I’ve done a similar thought experiment on this board a couple of years ago, “[what if you had one billion dollars](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/thought-experiment-what-if-you-had-a-billion-dollars/835761/48)” and I see this thread may fall into a similar trap: many answers that don’t require a lot of money, or wishes that couldn’t come true even even with all the money in the world. For instance, why hasn’t Bill Gates already solved world hunger? Not for lack of money or trying.

So, the most interesting answers to me are those that stay inside these constraints, i.e. they take a LOT of money (and I mean, _a lot_ ) and can also be accomplished. Owning something, sure. Supporting a cause? I guess that fits too, although you can’t be sure of the outcome.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-would-you-do-if-money-were-literally-no-object/957616)._