# What's an Indirect Descendant?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-an-indirect-descendant/156897>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [February 23, 2003, 3:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-an-indirect-descendant/156897 "2003-02-23T03:16:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 12\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rillian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bcef8e/32.png) [@Rillian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rillian)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2003, 3:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-an-indirect-descendant/156897/1 "2003-02-23T03:16:25Z")

</div>

In genealogy, the phrase “direct descendant” is used regularly. Isn’t that redundant? Either you are a descendant of a particular person or you’re not.

Some genealogy reference books attempt to define indirect descendant as “descended from a common ancestor but through different lines” which, in my opinion, means you are potentially distant cousins, but you are still each (direct) descendants of a common ancestor.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2003, 3:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-an-indirect-descendant/156897/2 "2003-02-23T03:17:54Z")

</div>

You’re an indirect descendant of Ben Franklin if you’re a direct descendant of his sister.

It’s an imprecise term, and I avoid it in my genealogical discussions, but lots of others employ it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rillian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bcef8e/32.png) [@Rillian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rillian)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2003, 3:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-an-indirect-descendant/156897/3 "2003-02-23T03:29:34Z")

</div>

If I’m a descendant of Ben Franklin’s sister, I am a descedant of their father, but am I not a decesdant of Ben, at least not in a biological sense.

Sounds like “indirect descendant” is way for some people to try to claim a relationship that doesn’t exist - e.g. I’m an (indirect) descendant of George Washington.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2003, 3:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-an-indirect-descendant/156897/4 "2003-02-23T03:46:20Z")

</div>

Oh, the relationship exists, all right. It’s one of collateral relations. And kingships have turned on such things. How do you think the German-speaking George I ended up King of England?

I also posit that “indirect descendant” sounds better to a lot of people than claiming Ben Franklin as a “cousin”. He would be one, something like first cousin 7 times removed.

Personally, I’d opt for cousin. Heck, Prince William of England is 27th cousin, 9 times removed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Broadway\_Danny\_Rose](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/bc79bd/32.png) [@Broadway\_Danny\_Rose](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Broadway_Danny_Rose)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2003, 7:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-an-indirect-descendant/156897/5 "2003-02-23T07:03:16Z")

</div>

George W Bush is an indirest descendant of Franklin Pierce the 14th President of the United States through his mother Barbra Pierce (Bush).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Northern\_Piper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/northern_piper/32/5304_2.png) [@Northern\_Piper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Northern_Piper)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2003, 1:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-an-indirect-descendant/156897/6 "2003-02-23T13:11:28Z")

</div>

Ah, but George I got the nod because he was a direct descendant of the Electress Sophia (his mum), who in turn was a direct descendant of James I & VI (her grandfather).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rillian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bcef8e/32.png) [@Rillian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rillian)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2003, 8:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-an-indirect-descendant/156897/7 "2003-02-23T20:14:58Z")

</div>

Consider the following three sentences:

A. I am a descendant of George Washington.  
B. I am a direct descendant of George Washington.  
C. I am an indirect descendant of George Washington.

B = A, therefore “direct” is redundant and can be left out.

For C, if George is a great-great-…-parent, then it is the same as A.

If I am related to George through a sister, cousin, brother, etc., then I am not **his** descendant, but we are, of course, relations.

What’s wrong with just being cousins or a grand-grand-…-nephew? Why the rush to claim descendancy from someone who isn’t your ancestor?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zev\_steinhardt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/97f17d/32.png) [@zev\_steinhardt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zev_steinhardt)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2003, 8:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-an-indirect-descendant/156897/8 "2003-02-23T20:17:42Z")

</div>

Of course, since George Washington had no children, no one is his direct descendant… 🙂

Zev Steinhardt

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rillian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bcef8e/32.png) [@Rillian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rillian)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2003, 8:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-an-indirect-descendant/156897/9 "2003-02-23T20:40:54Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by zev\_steinhardt \*  
> Of course, since George Washington had no children, no one is his direct descendant…

No. No one is his descendant. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2003, 9:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-an-indirect-descendant/156897/10 "2003-02-23T21:02:13Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Rillian \*  
> \*\*No. No one is his descendant. 😉 \*\*

While I agree with you, we are now faced with semantics. Some people recognize indirect descent to mean what was described. I know what they’re talking about when the term is used, even if I think it’s silly. But so far they’ve refused to change for my benefit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rillian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bcef8e/32.png) [@Rillian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rillian)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2003, 9:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-an-indirect-descendant/156897/11 "2003-02-23T21:08:33Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Qadgop the Mercotan \*  
> \*\*While I agree with you, we are now faced with semantics. \*\*

I agree. Since my OP asked what an “indirect descendant” is, I think you have answered the question.

Direct Descendant: a biological descendant of a person.

Indirect Descendant: a blood relation, but not a biological descendant of a person. Used by some people because it sounds better than “third cousin, twice removed” or similar relationships.

Thanks everyone. 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2003, 9:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-an-indirect-descendant/156897/12 "2003-02-23T21:28:22Z")

</div>

Well, then we’ll just have to agree to… um, agree, I guess.
