Digital cassettes never really caught on; I’ve never seen a digital cassette player.
These are analogue, and like vinyl enthusiasts this is the reason for the resurgence. Some people claim that analogue sounds better and is a better representation than digital (Neil Young). Personally, I can’t tell the difference. Hell I can’t even tell the difference in MP3 format.
I’m in the process of reading BLM’s memoir. No, not “Black Lives Matter” or “Bureau of Land Management”, but “Bernard Law Montgomery”. He’s pretty insufferable. I understand why so many Americans hated him during the war.
My car came with a cassette player factory installed. I used it to listen to a Discman using an adapter. Then I got an mp3 player and listened to it the same way. The playback head eventually went out of alignment and I replaced it with a CD stereo with an input jack. I plug my mp3 player (a smartphone now) into the jack. I don’t think I’ve listened to an actual cassette in 20 years.
I’ve also had plenty of cassette tapes on which the takeup reel would stop rotating, but the player would keep advancing the tape. The tape would tangle up inside the cassette player.
I thought that the takeup reel was the only one that was motorized, and that the source reel only rotated because it was being pulled by the tape. How would you motorize both, given that the relative speeds will change as the tape is unwound and wound?
You’re forgetting that the most important drive is the capstan… that’s what controlled the actual linear velocity of the tape, along with providing reliable contact with the head (because of the pinch roller).
In all the cassette drives I’ve seen, the supply reel is basically free-spinning. (Granted, in an auto-reverse player, it becomes the driven take-up reel in the opposite direction, but that’s not the same as saying that it’s power-driven as a supply reel.)
Actually, I’m not forgetting that, because I never knew that in the first place. I assumed that the system just allowed the linear velocity of the tape to vary, and that the resultant inefficiency was just an accepted cost for the simplicity of the system. So how is the takeup reel driven? Is it just on a clutch of some sort that slips at fairly low torque, to allow for the changes in speed?
I remember DATs (digital audio tapes) having a brief popularity in the late eighties (I think), among serious audiophiles. But they were kind of expensive, and never really caught on with the average listener.
Bleh, every cassette player I ever had sounded much better playing one side of the tape than the other. I don’t miss them at all. LPs I can sort of understand the nostalgia for, but MP3s are the pinnacle of quality and flexibility for me.
Yeah, that’s about the right time. I remember playing Zak McKracken, which came out in 1988, and there was a DAT object in it. I knew what it was at the time, but didn’t hear of anybody using it.
I also remember the old Commodore tape drives as well. Those used regular analog tape.
Yeah, but the “clutch” is just the friction between a smooth rotating shaft and the plastic take up cog. You could grab the take up cog and stop its rotation without much effort at all.
I loved cassettes! I liked to edit, and editing with cassettes was simple. I had quite a lot of fun messing around with dubbing decks. It was a fairly straightforward process to make lo-fi remixes or to edit sections out of songs. I once created an entire 90-minute tape out of what I considered the best sections of Mr. Bungle songs.
Now of course the digital age has made all of those techniques obsolete, but if I still owned a dubbing deck I’d probably still be doing that stuff, just for fun.
When I was in my 20s and lived with a couple of roommates CD were just becoming popular. Between the 3 of us we were starting to build a serious collection.
One of my favourite things was to get completely blotto and then make myself a mixed tape.
The next day, usually while out driving, I’d listen to the tape with no recollection of what was on it.
I used to do that, too. Once made a 20-minute extended version of Journey’s “Separate Ways”.
That was also a useful skill when making mix tapes. I would never buy albums on cassette, only on vinyl LP, then record them to blank cassettes. Then I would fill the blank space at the end with songs from other albums. I’d never leave more than 10 seconds of silence before the tape ran out. Usually this would simply be a matter of choosing songs of the correct length, but if that failed, I would edit songs down to the correct length.
I remember it being much easier to simply use the pause button and my ears to make edits that in some cases sounded as good as if they had been done by professionals. Nowadays, I still haven’t been able to figure out digital editing to come up with anything anywhere near as good as what I could do back in the day with a tape recorder.
If memory serves, the trick was to pause right where you wanted to make the cut, hit stop, pull the cassette out, roll the tape back a quarter turn, and it would be exactly where you paused. This was surprisingly accurate; even accounting for a little slop the transitions were practically seamless.
.
This has not been my experience. I have cassettes I recorded in the late 70s that still play just fine. I took good care of them. I am thinking about buying a new cassette deck, I’m running out of machines to play the hundreds of tapes I still have. Lots of good stuff on those old tapes.
One of my cars does. So, at least in that case cassettes are more practical than CDs or certainly vinyl. And of course, since I have a cassette player I can’t plug a phone into it.