How much energy goes into heating the water to scrub it with, though?
The OP’s question is, after all, which is more environmentally friendly, using recycled aluminum (which he will now recycle again), or scrubbing the pan with hot water? I’d assume it would depend on certain factors, such as:
This is from a UKsite, and it assumes hot water is heated by a gas boiler, which may not be the case in your home:
I don’t know what constitutes “extravagant,” but I’d guess it means running hot water onto the pan while scrubbing it.
I also don’t know what the CO2e of recycling aluminum is. If someone can provide that, it should be easy to resolve your argument.
Is the pan the only thing you run the water for? Do like my brothers did back in the day and throw the pan in a cold oven for a few days until you have enough for a sinkful. Drove my parents nuts.
Recycled Aluminum needs about 8% of the energy. (Cite : Sustainability and Efficiency - Aluminum Transportation Group) Add to it another 10% for transportation / sorting/ manufacturing . So roughly recycled Aluminum has 20% of the carbon footprint of new aluminum. So about 4 kg of CO2 per kg of Aluminum.
For water, the carbon footprint varies due to heating/ waste water processing / pumping etc. for the UK, the published value is about 0.8 g CO2 /l of tap water ( Cite : http://oco-carbon.com/metrics/the-carbon-footprint-of-tap-water/). So let’s say you use a gallon (about 4 l of water to clean the pan). Then the CO2 footprint is about 3.2 g.
To summarize :
** A. carbon footprint using foil : 32 g
B. Washing the pan, carbon footprint : 3.2 g**
You must be newly married since you believe logical scientific calculations will help you resolve a dispute. Good luck
Here are some numbers to give you some perspective:
A. CO2 footprint of the foil = 32 g
B. Same CO2 is released by burning 1/16 th of a typical 8 oz candle
C. Same CO2 is released by driving about 400 ft or 0.08 miles in a tupical American car
After reading all of this input, I’ve decided that the aluminum foil is an unnecessary “middle man” in the cooking process. A fine coating of olive oil for lubrication on a non stick baking sheet is just fine. That is, in fact, what I do. The washing of the pan takes only seconds and is, to me, a non-factor.
I think if you never use foil you are inevitably shortening the lifespan of the baking sheet so I think that should be part of an environmental calculation.
It’s pretty close to completely false. Aluminum production is so energy intensive that the market already supports recyclers buying used aluminum from individuals for reuse. If I didn’t put it in the bin I could save my aluminum and sell it to an industrial metal recycler about 5 miles away. Dropping it in the bin is more a subsidy for the recycling of other materials that require a subsidy for the market to work. Unlike a lot of recycled products, recycled aluminum doesn’t suffer from being inadequate for the same uses as virgin material.
Think of it this way: Suppose that, instead of washing the pan in hot, soapy water, you instead cleaned it by melting it down and pouring it into a pan-shaped mold to resolidify. Does that sound like it’d be an environmentally-friendly option? Does it seem any more appealing if you do that before you use the pan each time, instead of after? What if someone else melts the pan down for you?
Because that’s what the foil actually is. Someone melted down a bunch of aluminum and shaped it into clean foil for you, and then after all that work, you’re only using it once. OK, it’s not as much weight as the whole pan, but I doubt you’d consider melting off just a foil-thin layer of your pan surface, either.