You’ve changed the scenario by adding additional variations. As for being a political masochist, I’ll treat that contempt with the remark it deserves.
Didn’t you get contempt and remark mixed up?
Well, you did say
Which implies that even though he’s really good at what he does, he has these additional “habits” on the side.
In which case NO, I would not have any problem with his personal choices in life - so long as he made me my money.
I asked you to give an example in which your scenario makes any sense at all, which you haven’t. I’ve demonstrated why I think your position makes absolutely no sense, so please, enlighten me as to why it does. I’m very interested to know how you can justify voting for a candidate actively working against your views.