# What's the current consensus on global warming?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-the-current-consensus-on-global-warming/348482>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [March 15, 2006, 5:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-the-current-consensus-on-global-warming/348482 "2006-03-15T17:12:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sweeteviljesus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/898d66/32.png) [@sweeteviljesus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sweeteviljesus)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 5:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-the-current-consensus-on-global-warming/348482/1 "2006-03-15T17:12:03Z")

</div>

This will probably turn into a GD issue, but I want to know what most scientists think about global warming. Is it happening? Is it man-made? Are doubts about it just wishful thinking or is it really still open to debate?

Thanks for your help,  
Rob

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 5:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-the-current-consensus-on-global-warming/348482/2 "2006-03-15T17:19:27Z")

</div>

> [@sweeteviljesus](#):
>
> Is it happening? Is it man-made?

The majority – but not quite consensus – opinion in the scientific community is “yes” to both.

Here’s a good place to read up on it: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global\_warming\_controversy](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_controversy)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UncleBeer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/977dab/32.png) [@UncleBeer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UncleBeer)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 5:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-the-current-consensus-on-global-warming/348482/3 "2006-03-15T17:22:44Z")

</div>

There aren’t more than a very few reputable scientists still expressing doubts that we’re currently experiencing a global warming trend - at least none that can be taken seriously. There is, however, still reasonable debate over the cause (or more likely - causes) of it. As there is over the magnitude and prognosis.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 5:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-the-current-consensus-on-global-warming/348482/4 "2006-03-15T17:30:34Z")

</div>

> [@UncleBeer](#):
>
> There aren’t more than a very few reputable scientists still expressing doubts that we’re currently experiencing a global warming trend - at least none that can be taken seriously. There is, however, still reasonable debate over the cause (or more likely - causes) of it. As there is over the magnitude and prognosis.

I would say, based on my own experiece, there is a very strong consensus among scientists - certainly, among those I know personally, and from what I have heard in conferences - that not only is global change occurring but that the major cause is human activity, in particular burning of fossil fuels.

Public statements by scientists are actually much more careful and conservative on the issue than what I have heard expressed personally or in discussion in conferences.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![griffin1977](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@griffin1977](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/griffin1977)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2006, 7:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-the-current-consensus-on-global-warming/348482/5 "2006-03-16T07:22:38Z")

</div>

> [@sweeteviljesus](#):
>
> This will probably turn into a GD issue, but I want to know what most scientists think about global warming. Is it happening?

It does risk hitting GD territory. But basically yes.

On 7 June 2005 by the national science academies of Britain, France, Russia, Germany, US, Japan, Italy, Canada, Brazil, China and India issued the following statement:

There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system  
as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now  
strong evidence that significant global warming is  
occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements  
of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean  
temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in  
average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes  
to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that  
most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed  
to human activities. This warming has already  
led to changes in the Earth’s climate.

The existence of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is  
vital to life on Earth – in their absence average  
temperatures would be about 30 centigrade degrees lower  
than they are today. But human activities are now causing  
atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases –  
including carbon dioxide, methane, tropospheric ozone,  
and nitrous oxide – to rise well above pre-industrial levels.  
Carbon dioxide levels have increased from 280 ppm in  
1750 to over 375 ppm today – higher than any previous  
levels that can be reliably measured (i.e. in the last 420,000  
years). Increasing greenhouse gases are causing  
temperatures to rise; the Earth’s surface warmed by  
approximately 0.6 centigrade degrees over the twentieth  
century. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change  
(IPCC) projected that the average global surface  
temperatures will continue to increase to between 1.4  
centigrade degrees and 5.8 centigrade degrees above 1990  
levels, by 2100.

[http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/displaypagedoc.asp?id=13618](http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/displaypagedoc.asp?id=13618)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UncleBeer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/977dab/32.png) [@UncleBeer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UncleBeer)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2006, 4:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-the-current-consensus-on-global-warming/348482/6 "2006-03-16T16:55:59Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> I would say, based on my own experiece, there is a very strong consensus among scientists - certainly, among those I know personally, and from what I have heard in conferences - that not only is global change occurring but that the major cause is human activity, in particular burning of fossil fuels.
> 
> Public statements by scientists are actually much more careful and conservative on the issue than what I have heard expressed personally or in discussion in conferences.

Yeah? Interesting. Thanks for the inside peek.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colophon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f05b48/32.png) [@Colophon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colophon)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2006, 5:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whats-the-current-consensus-on-global-warming/348482/7 "2006-03-16T17:51:17Z")

</div>

Not global, I know, but the CET (Central England Temperature series) graphs at the Hadley Centre website make uncomfortable viewing: [http://www.metoffice.com/research/hadleycentre/obsdata/cet.html](http://www.metoffice.com/research/hadleycentre/obsdata/cet.html)

In fcat they also have global temperature charts - [http://www.metoffice.com/research/hadleycentre/CR\_data/Annual/HadCRUG.gif](http://www.metoffice.com/research/hadleycentre/CR_data/Annual/HadCRUG.gif)

It seems fairly cut and dried that global warming _is_ happening. The debate nowadays seems mostly focused on weather it’s man-made, and when you consider that CO[sub]2[/sub] levels are currently at their highest for at least [a million years](http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4803460.stm), it’s not hard to see why many scientists are convinced.
