What's the dark underside of our society? Your theories.

Which party does that again?

That’s exactly the sort of comment that terrifies me.

Not heard it, but it sounds like it is nice to lawyers, which is a rarity.

Wasn’t taught that way in my science classes in the 1970s and 1980s. Nor in my colleagues classes at university in the 1980s and 1990s. Nor in my son’s current science classes in the 2010s.
]I guess it is possible it all went to hell in the 2000s, and was restored by the time he started science class, but I doubt it somewhat.

Sone people don’t get food stamps. They have to make due with, ya know, cash. A very specific, limited amount of cash (which is just enough to keep them from being eligible for food stamps), which they also have to use to pay their bills.

Plenty of those people starve the last week of the month, because your landlord and the gas company doesn’t really give a shit how sick you are of potatoes, they want their money.

Not heard it, but it sounds like it is nice to lawyers, which is a rarity.
[/QUOTE]

No such luck - in the version I heard the lawyer (sometimes an accountant) closes all the doors and windows and whispers: “What do you want it to be?”.

This is true of a lot (okay probably most) of countries, cultures, and civilizations. We are using an alphabet devised in the Latin peninsula to communicate in a language whose mother tongue came from the Caucuaus mountains. Why? Because Indo-European speaking tribes wiped out or colonized everybody, but the Basque speakers in Europe. Heck, technically English is a foreign language in England. It comes from the Angles, Saxons, & Jutes who invade after the Roman Empire fell.

No, in that joke, the lawyer, asked, “How much is 2 + 2?”, answers, “How much do you want it to be?”

I’ve heard the exact same joke with an accountant substituted.

Lawyers and bankers. :smack: usually the greatest evil isn’t something you have to look for, since it comes and finds you.

Maybe the post Enron version?

My point is the total sacrifice of objectivity to agendas.

This is as close to the “fundamental problem” as I think you can get. In fact, what long-term planning there is today is usually based on poor or wrong ideas and is really a pretext for helping the proposer achieve his own personal short-term goals. For example, the new efficiency standards for light bulbs got passed not because anyone really gives a crap about conserving energy, but because GE wanted to sell a lot of high-profit newfangled light bulbs.

Any plan with a time horizon of shorter than a year is not much of a plan at all, but any plan with a time horizon of 100 years is also useless because there is no known way to predict the consequences of our actions 100 years out. Can’t we agree to something like a 10-15 year planning horizon for things like the federal budget?

This is another aspect of the shortsightedness identified above. Most people are smart enough to realize that the claims made in commercials are for the short-term benefit of the advertiser, not the long-term benefit of the viewer. What people are slow to get is that everything is a commercial now. A company would say 2+2=5 if it meant one percent more profit next quarter.

Yeah, but time absolves responsibility. Genghis Khan killed far more people than Hitler yet is it illegal to praise him in Mongolia?

At 240 years, The United States is still a baby.

The anti-sustainability, anti-environment crowd scare me. And they even call themselves “conservatives.” Makes me think the devil does exist…

If you want to see the real underside, you would have had to have been around when abortion was illegal. Girls still got pregnant. That has not changed. But if a girl got pregnant, you had to get a back alley abortion. It was Kafkaesque . Go down the alley, meet a person who would take you to the “doctor”. Then go to a location you are terrified to be in. Hand them 400 bucks and you leave the room. She goes in behind a curtain and some likely unqualified person would perform some action to end the pregnancy. It could be coat hangar. It could be anything, because you had to trust that they knew what they were doing. Some young girls died. Some were taken to hospitals to be saved. Some were never able to get pregnant again. It was a horrible demeaning event. if abortion was outlawed, that is what would happen again.
Girls whose parents had money, would go abroad and nothing was said. Some got aborted in hospitals, because some doctors still performed abortions if they knew you.
As always, high sounding laws come down hard on the poor. The rich don’t have to suffer.

And the IRS. :stuck_out_tongue:

And went from there to prison . . . while the men who impregnated them were free to go find their next victims . . .

Whistleblower tells of America's hidden nightmare for its sick poor | US news | The Guardian Here is a story about the poor in America and the health care the do not get. Many think the poor just go to an emergency room and get free health care. it is wrong. Many Americans go without health care of any kind. It is a horror for America.

Oh, yeah, sorry, I forgot the biggest one :wink: ! Thanks for keeping it all straight in my head.

“Victims,” huh? :dubious: Do you think you’re showing just a smidgen of your own bias shared by the era you’re criticizing?