What's the Deal with the Falkland Islands?

Well, yes and no. It’s a problem in the sense that it makes meaningful progress towards resolution impossible. It’s quite helpful in making an objective determination about who is more to blame, though.

From the Roger Waters article:

If the British are engaging in colonialism by retaining sovereignty over the islands, what the hell do the Argentinians think they’re doing by invading them? One would think that such staunch anti-colonialists would be primarily concerned with the islander’s right to self-determination.

Then Las Malvinas is possibly the correct name to use when speaking/writing Spanish. Anything in the English language is a completely different matter, much as though a Brit doesn’t use Deutschland when speaking English and a German doesn’t use United Kingdom (or Great Britain) when speaking German.

So someone, for example Sean Penn, declaring in English that their name is “Las Malvinas” is a prize tit.

Bunch of foreigners, telling us how to spell English.

:slight_smile:

The points are yours Ludovic, spend them wisely.

Not really a good idea for Argentina to be goading the EU into a trade war, I’d imagine.

Usuahia, capital city of Tierra del Fuego, lives because of tourism. And yet its authorities turned away to fat ships full of people eager to throw their money at them. Also, that city was founded by an english anglican priest!

This is a very strange country.

We ourselves do not understand it, the rest of the dopers are hopelessly lost.

:smiley:

If it makes you feel any better, the US is reasonably close to electing a head of state who thinks that wanting everyone to go to college makes you a snob.

Why do you think I read all the political threads in the dope? :smiley:

But, if it makes you feel any better, the whole species is more than a bit “strange” in the head, the crazy knows no borders.

My theory it’s that we alone among the animal species understand our own mortality and that drives us mad.

Yep-Argentina is not understandable…it is like when (dictator and head crook) Juan Peron nationalized the British-owned railroads-immediately the railroads started breaking down (the new owners didn’t understand the concept of “maintainance”).
Argentina loses world trade and tourism because of these islands-which the K will never give up.

Well, it’s the 30th anniversary of the invasion, and in considering the Argentine response, the word “counterproductive” springs immediately to mind: HuffPost - Breaking News, U.S. and World News | HuffPost

Interesting opinion piece in the guardian today. On my phone otherwise I’d link to it.

This one?

This one?

Amazing, identipost.

Serious question: does all this fighty rhetoric actually benefit the Fernandez government domestically?

Make that Juan Carlos Lujan guy President of Argentina.

Hmm, interesting stuff in the Guardian. Thanks.

The Reagan Administration’s deliberations, behind the scenes: US feared Falklands war would be 'close-run thing', documents reveal | US foreign policy | The Guardian

Musing on the diminution of British naval and industrial power since 1982: The Falklands war couldn't happen today – we don't have enough ship builders | Ian Jack | The Guardian

It’s called Greatminditis. :slight_smile:

The Argentinian President has just been making a speech about the Falklands. The BBC presenter did say that the live translation they had was not very good, but fucking hell… do thinking Argentinians really believe that shite? Embarrassing stuff.

On the other hand, just finished Max Hastings and Simon Jenkins book about the conflict. What a short and brutal war it was. The Royal Navy and the Argentinian Air Force - bloody hell - lots of brave, brave people there.

Actually it was this piece I was referring to by Simon Jenkins.