Under Apartheid South Africa, the townships were those areas near the urban centres that were designated for non-white dwellings. They were overcrowded, poverty stricken and crime riddled (rather unsurprisingly). Thus in South African parlance the word township still has connotations of danger and poverty, pretty much the same connotations others might have of the word “slum”.
I found some information on this in the Ohio Statues**
This implies that even where there are cities, townships have some remaining functions distinct from those of cities, and therefore it is convenient for a city to be coextenxive with a township. I know from Illinois (where I also lived) that townships (which are unincorporated) remain even where there are “municipalities” incorporated cities, villages, or towns (which is an incorporated township), while in Michigan, an area incorporated in a city is not part of any township.) The functions of those townships include schools, assessing property values, various social services. For example, Evanston Township is coextensive with the City of Evanston, but they have separate governments, and New Trier Township is even more complex (See New Trier Township Government . Here’s an excerpt:
**For more detailed information, the Illinois General Statues - especially Chapters 50,60, and 65 - can give much more detailed information on local government structure - this page is specifically on townships within cities. In Cook County, there are 133 municipalities, as detailed on the Municipalities in Cook County page.
I also discovered that Chicago contains 8 townships, including Rogers Park and Lakeview townships, and that property tax assessmants still are done by the townships as part of the county government – not by the City of Chicago. You can go to this League of Women Voters page for additional information about Illinois townships and their functions from a campaign the LWV undertook to abolish them, due to their cumbersome and inequitable nature.
Well, not quite. On May 18, 1796, Congress passed an act providing for the survey of the “territory northwest of the river Ohio, and above the mouth of Kentucky river…by north and south lines run according to the true meridian, and by others crossing them at right angles, so as to form townships of six miles square…the sections shall be numbered respectively, beginning with the number one, in the northeast section, and proceeding west and east alternately, through the township with progressive numbers, till the thirty-sixth be completed.”
However, on June 1, 1796, an act was passed by Congress providing for diving the “United States military tract” in Ohio into townships five miles square, each to be subdivided into quarter townships containing 4,000 acres.
[From *A Treatise on the Law of Surveying and Boundaries * by John S. Grimes, Esq.]
So, the military tract was not governed by the act concerning the northwest territories.
True, but the military tract, (acording to this map and this map, appears to have had its Northeast corner around Coshocton or Newcomerstown and had no direct bearing on the Western Reserve to the North and separated from the Military Tract by one of the Congress Lands–half of which was surveyed at 5 x 5 and half at 6 x 6.
State College (a borough)–home of Penn State’s main campus–is a good example. While I was there (left 5 years ago) a continuous local debate was whether or not the Borough of State College should merge with College Township and one other small adjacent locality whose name escapes me. The increase in population would make the new entity into a third-class City, IIRC, which has different taxation rules than a borough and therefore could dramatically alter the way the local govt. makes its money.