Not to endorse Uncommon’s statement, but just because his explanation of events is unpopular and poorly worded doesn’t have to mean that it’s incorrect. He states that he is speaking from personal experience–I have no particular reason to doubt this.
The common argument here is that cheap equals McDonald’s equals Fat. But no one has stated, except for kunilou, why McDonald’s equals overeating. Sure they have fatty food–but if you eat a full hamburger a day and start gaining weight the only solution isn’t to exercise. You can start only eating a half of your burger or a quarter or however much it takes to keep your weight at level.
An extension of Kunilou’s would be that they eat too much because, in a situation of financial insecurity, eating more allows them a sense of security. Uncommon, however, believes that the reason for their financial insecurity is because they made the wrong decisions in life (even if he didn’t state it so nicely), the two are not mutually exclusive nor untenable.
I just attempted to a search on whether anyone has done any tests to see if there is a correlation between poor and lazy, but no results were immediately forthcoming. Thsi strikes me as rather odd, being as that it is a fairly central concern when talking about many of the various social spending issues of US policy. Does anyone know of any?