# When did religion jump the shark for great thinkers?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [May 31, 2010, 11:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373 "2010-05-31T11:07:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [May 31, 2010, 11:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/21 "2010-05-31T23:28:09Z")

</div>

1686, with Newton proposing that objects in the heavens operated under the same rules as objects on Earth. I figure that’s the beginning, when the childish wish-fulfilment nonsense of religion started to get beaten back by reason.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Camus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ba8739/32.png) [@Camus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Camus)\
**Post date:** [May 31, 2010, 11:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/22 "2010-05-31T23:33:53Z")

</div>

> [@FriarTed](#):
>
> … Calvin… et al already did all that heavy lifting- the Scriptures & Commentaries they left tell us what to do, now let’s get to work.

So we should establish theocratic-like states and execute those we deem heretical or blasphemous?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 12:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/23 "2010-06-01T00:14:04Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> Evolution, as Der Trihs pointed out, is a blow to religion. But so were Newton’s laws of motion, the heliocentric model of the solar system, atomic theory and a dozen other major breakthroughs; each has chipped away at mysticism.

Most of those chipped away at it; evolution was more like a charge of dynamite. Especially since it touched on the matter we care about the most. Newton was a close second though; not just for the laws but due to the concept of universal laws that applied everywhere, like **Bryan Ekers** points out. The idea that the same laws apply to everything is a big difference from the ancient idea that there’s the Earth with its rules, and the heavens with different ones. Notice how believers tend to feel compelled to add the claim that their god is an exception; they need to make it a special case explicitly instead of it just being assumed that the rules are different.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Perciful](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/b38774/32.png) [@Perciful](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Perciful)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 1:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/24 "2010-06-01T01:17:53Z")

</div>

> [@FriarTed](#):
>
> When I’m at a used book sale, I usually grab anything I can find by him… and he was a great popular communicator who could actually bring in ratings! Imagine someone like him being given a prime-time slot on network TV today.
> 
> EWTN and the occasional charismatic Christian cable station still carry him. I once mentioned him to a friend at work and my friend said “You mean the guy in the black outfit & the violet cape. He looks like a superhero!”
> 
> My friend ran a comic book store for a while.

He is one of the wisest men and it is so good he is on Catholic Clips and Utube. When the world doesn’t seem to make sense to me I just watch one of his video’s and he makes perfect sense to me. He also had a good sense of humor as well as stage presence. One of my fav video’s of his is The Three Confessions which I leave for your enjoyment. 🙂

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfp2GWSOnq0&feature=related](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfp2GWSOnq0&feature=related)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cosmosdan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a6a055/32.png) [@cosmosdan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cosmosdan)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 1:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/25 "2010-06-01T01:34:36Z")

</div>

I think it’s a naive, bias, or just ludicrious to think there are no or very few great thinkers within the religious community. The world in general is still predominatly religious and/or spritual among it’s population. Among that very high % do we really believe there are so few great thinkers?

What about folks like Ghandi and MLK? I’ve read a bit by John Selby Spong and I’d say he qualifies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 1:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/26 "2010-06-01T01:38:41Z")

</div>

> [@cosmosdan](#):
>
> I think it’s a naive, bias, or just ludicrious to think there are no or very few great thinkers within the religious community. The world in general is still predominatly religious and/or spritual among it’s population. Among that very high % do we really believe there are so few great thinkers?

Yes. Religion just isn’t a profound or useful subject (except for manipulation and making excuses); however “great” they may be, standing in the intellectual kiddie pool limits them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 1:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/27 "2010-06-01T01:58:33Z")

</div>

“Almost everything that distinguishes the modern world from earlier centuries is attributable to science, which achieved its most spectacular triumphs in the seventeenth century.”

– Bertrand Russell

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveG1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@SteveG1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SteveG1)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 2:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/28 "2010-06-01T02:05:27Z")

</div>

I suggest it got a big impetus with the printing press. People could buy and read Bibles for themselves, in their own “profane” language. Once this happened, they could also come up with their interpretations. Some may have been good interpretations, some may have been bad ones. But, the Bible stopped being some sort of “monopoly” owned by the more educated classes (clergy and nobles).

This should factor in somewhere, along with the the “cancellation” of the geocentric universe, the Enlightenment, the theory of evolution, and the discovery of other galaxies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gravitycrash](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@gravitycrash](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gravitycrash)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 2:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/29 "2010-06-01T02:44:00Z")

</div>

> [@KarlGauss](#):
>
> Many nails in that coffin, but one that hasn’t been mentioned is the realization that there are billions of galaxies, each with billions of stars.
> 
> The notion that we are unique in the vastness of such a cosmos became less and less tenable.

This is the one that did it for me. Earth is so insignificant when you look at the big picture. So yeah, when enough people way more intelligent than me looked through a telescope for the first time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FriarTed](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/friarted/32/1052_2.png) [@FriarTed](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FriarTed)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 2:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/30 "2010-06-01T02:47:09Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> Uhh… so?
> 
> I think the OP is being really badly misunderstood here. **The question here is not whether people are turning into atheists.** The question posed by the OP concerns the fact that fewer great minds are concerning themselves with matters of theology than used to be the case. It doesn’t even matter if the great minds belong to devout Christians.
> 
> Norman Borlaug may have been a great mind who was also a Christian, but he wasn’t a theologian, he was a biologist. Albert Einstein was not a theologian, nor were almost any great mind of the 19th and 20th century. But if you start going back into history, the further back you go, the more likely it is that the great minds spend a lot of their time on matters pertaining to God. That’s what the OP is asking about.

That was my point- that intelligent believers are often less concerned with “re-inventing the wheel” of re-hashing the big Theological questions than with going out & actually doing practical work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FriarTed](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/friarted/32/1052_2.png) [@FriarTed](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FriarTed)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 2:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/31 "2010-06-01T02:48:25Z")

</div>

> [@Camus](#):
>
> So we should establish theocratic-like states and execute those we deem heretical or blasphemous?

Yeah, that’s exactly what I was saying.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 2:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/32 "2010-06-01T02:53:06Z")

</div>

> [@FriarTed](#):
>
> Yeah, that’s exactly what I was saying.

Well, of the systems that were in place during the times of Moses, Jesus, Paul, Augustine, Aquinas, Calvin, Buddha, Confuscius, Mohammed et al, which one do _you_ want to live under?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boyo\_Jim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@Boyo\_Jim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boyo_Jim)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 3:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/33 "2010-06-01T03:11:06Z")

</div>

Honestly, I think the turning point wasn’t really about any of these great discoveries. It was about the Church’s reaction to discoveries and theories which challenged the accepted understanding of the universe.

The church stomped on science and punished scientists as heretics, without mking any serious attempt to understand the new ideas and reconcile them in some manner with its own teachings.

It became clear to Great Minds that the church was more interested in defending dogma than discovering truth. It became clear to Great Minds that the Church was in fact an obstacle to progress. The Church became something to avoid, and then to actively oppose. It was then that religion jumped the shark as far as Great Minds were concerned.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FriarTed](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/friarted/32/1052_2.png) [@FriarTed](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FriarTed)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 3:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/34 "2010-06-01T03:19:32Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> Well, of the systems that were in place during the times of Moses, Jesus, Paul, Augustine, Aquinas, Calvin, Buddha, Confuscius, Mohammed et al, which one do _you_ want to live under?

Well, I don’t think that Jesus, Paul, or Buddha were controlling any of the systems at the time. I would, however, like to live under a system constructed by Jesus & administered by Paul, and to some extent, I already do as a member of the general Christian Church.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![straight\_man](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/straight_man/32/3027_2.png) [@straight\_man](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/straight_man)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 3:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/35 "2010-06-01T03:24:42Z")

</div>

If I may ask an obvious question: if there are great minds turning to theology, _how will you notice if you aren’t studying theology?_ There are certainly esteemed professors at prestigious universities who study theology, but why would you ever know their names?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 3:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/36 "2010-06-01T03:33:20Z")

</div>

There was a time, for quite a while, when the physical and the metaphysical were essentially wrapped up as the same thing. All the way back to the Greek philosophers, that is the case. Aristotle’s writings, for centuries, were like the Wikipedia of the ancient and medieval worlds (and like wikipedia, he was often wrong). Distinctions between scientific and theological fact were not drawn particularly well, and philospohers (“lovers of wisdom”) engaged in physical sciences as well as philosphical/theological pursuits.

There were always skeptical thinkers, but it was really the Enlightenment period, and the development of scientific method, that science began to be disentangled as a discipline from philosophy and theology.

Science itself was then responsible for a lot of the intellegentsia’s movement away from trying to answer questions religiously. If you can do scientific experiements, you don’t need to look at the Bible anymore.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FriarTed](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/friarted/32/1052_2.png) [@FriarTed](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FriarTed)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 3:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/37 "2010-06-01T03:35:39Z")

</div>

> [@Boyo\_Jim](#):
>
> The church stomped on science and punished scientists as heretics, without mking any serious attempt to understand the new ideas and reconcile them in some manner with its own teachings.

Name one besides Galileo and Giordano Bruno. Those are the only two scientists I ever hear named who were persecuted by the Church, and with Bruno, it had much more to do with his theology than his science.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cosmosdan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a6a055/32.png) [@cosmosdan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cosmosdan)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 3:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/38 "2010-06-01T03:37:46Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> Yes. Religion just isn’t a profound or useful subject (except for manipulation and making excuses); however “great” they may be, standing in the intellectual kiddie pool limits them.

Well that must be true since two of the people I mentioned, Gandhi and MLK, didn’t really accomplish anything of note.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cosmosdan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a6a055/32.png) [@cosmosdan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cosmosdan)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 3:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/39 "2010-06-01T03:49:19Z")

</div>

> [@straight\_man](#):
>
> If I may ask an obvious question: if there are great minds turning to theology, _how will you notice if you aren’t studying theology?_ There are certainly esteemed professors at prestigious universities who study theology, but why would you ever know their names?

The OP can correct me but the idea of being a great thinker isn’t just about science or theology.

It’s also about the nature of man’s relationship to his fellow man and issues of justice, equlaity, the nature of love, forgiveness, compassion, etc. Philosophy and sociology are are cousins to thier religious heritage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Horatio\_Hellpop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/e5b9ba/32.png) [@Horatio\_Hellpop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Horatio_Hellpop)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 4:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373/40 "2010-06-01T04:11:22Z")

</div>

The Jesuits continue to teach and mold a disproportionately high number of first-rate critical thinkers, so I question the validity of the OP’s assertion.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-religion-jump-the-shark-for-great-thinkers/541373.md?page=3)
