# When did something being high cost or inconvenient translate into entitlement?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [May 20, 2024, 12:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802 "2024-05-20T12:23:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 2024, 6:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/201 "2024-05-26T18:56:03Z")

</div>

> [@jjakucyk](#):
>
> You’re still assuming that 1 instance of piracy equals 1 lost sale. That adjusts the moral calculus. And no, I’m not saying that “morally justifies” it. Something being “less bad” or “not that bad” is still bad. The outrage over it and the punishments levied against it should be proportional to that, but they’re not.

Why would you pirate it if you didn’t want it?

And you are correct- they dont usually go after someone who has pirated ONE thing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 2024, 6:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/202 "2024-05-26T18:58:11Z")

</div>

> [@Stratocaster](#):
>
> Can you imagine that? According to him. None of it. So, it was okay, right?

Which is pretty funny since apparently NONE of it was worth buying but they still just HAD to have it all anyway (for free, of course). Because… _waves hand_… reasons. And also it’s not as bad as torching a bus full of nuns.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stratocaster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stratocaster/32/16393_2.png) [@Stratocaster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stratocaster)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 2024, 7:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/203 "2024-05-26T19:18:39Z")

</div>

And inexplicably, before piracy was a thing, he actually purchased albums and the like. It’s confounding.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jjakucyk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/3d9bf3/32.png) [@jjakucyk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jjakucyk)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 2024, 7:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/204 "2024-05-26T19:42:54Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Why would you pirate it if you didn’t want it?

You can want something but not at the price it’s being offered at. Same reason some people wait for a thing to be discounted to buy it. That still doesn’t mean piracy is ok. This isn’t as hard as you’re making it out to be.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2024, 5:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/205 "2024-05-27T05:47:52Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Now out here in CA we have Toll LANES- which do go faster. But you do not need them. So fair. And the toll lanes are added lanes.

Right. And back when I was commuting, and toll lanes were not running for most of the day, I noticed that when they became free for everyone traffic speed did not increase significantly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2024, 6:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/206 "2024-05-27T06:00:11Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Nope. You would commit a crime by not buying his book, and instead pirating it. But if you want to read books for free- there is the library.

Obviously legal, but would it be considered ethical if we were not used to it? Clearly some people who borrow books at the library would buy them if the library was not available.  
How about if you buy a book and then sell or donate it to a used bookstore? The author and publisher get nothing for the resale. Ditto for CD and DVD resales.  
I’d guess that most movies are watched once. Is buying a copy and then sending it to five people, which is illegal, any different from buying a copy and selling it to a store which resells it to five people serially?  
A large percentage of my wife’s books go to libraries - there is a website that tracks how many libraries a book is in, and she knows her sales. She’s fine with it because she wants people to read them. Could she make more money if everyone had to buy them? Maybe, maybe not. They might get priced cheaper.  
I’m glad someone brought up libraries, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nightshadea](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/7ba0ec/32.png) [@nightshadea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/nightshadea)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2024, 6:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/207 "2024-05-27T06:06:46Z")

</div>

\<reads the topic and tries to stuff all the 5.3 gigs emulators and roms in the digital closet \> umm nope nothing to see here …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2024, 11:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/208 "2024-05-27T11:31:08Z")

</div>

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> I was asking why THEY switched stories from saying it didn’t matter if they stole it from one guy in a basement making three sales a month to its supposed impact on an EA shareholder.

Because it doesn’t matter, and the EA shareholder impact was more amusing to consider. The outraged want to equate piracy with theft, but they will never be equal, because they are fundamentally different acts.

Is an act of piracy = one lost sale? Sometimes it is, and other times it isn’t. Those other times are far more common because demand fluctuates with price, and pirated software has a price of $0. Users are far, far, more likely to take a flier on cost free software than they are on expensive software that they can’t return, give away or resell.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2024, 1:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/209 "2024-05-27T13:08:20Z")

</div>

> [@Cheesesteak](#):
>
> Is an act of piracy = one lost sale?

One act of piracy = One act of stealing stuff that doesn’t belong to you because of a juvenile sense of entitlement that you deserve other people’s work for free because, boohoo, you didn’t like the DRM or DLC schemes or just didn’t feel like paying for someone else’s effort if you could steal it instead.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mighty\_Mouse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mighty_mouse/32/7776_2.png) [@Mighty\_Mouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mighty_Mouse)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2024, 1:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/210 "2024-05-27T13:41:22Z")

</div>

Literally there is no “stuff” which is the essence of the argument on the other side. You can carry on with your hyperbolic equating of speeding with vehicular homicide with mass murder, but no one is fooled except the brainwashed useful idiots of extreme capitalism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2024, 2:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/211 "2024-05-27T14:02:07Z")

</div>

> [@Mighty\_Mouse](#):
>
> Literally there is no “stuff”

Yeah, this is the thing that weirdly only gets trotted out during piracy discussions. As previously stated, if you have a laptop full of downloaded child porn, no one is saying “Well, _technically_ there is no porn because it’s digital, see, and…” If someone steals nuclear submarine secrets, no one says “So, because there’s STILL nuclear submarine files on the Navy system, can we REALLY say it was stolen?”

You didn’t have the media before, you have it now, you have “stuff”.

> [@Mighty\_Mouse](#):
>
> You can carry on with your hyperbolic equating of speeding with vehicular homicide with mass murder

The only person who made a comparison like that was in defense of piracy (“It’s not $100 worth of baby food”) and any subsequent comparisons were in mockery of that defense.

> [@jjakucyk](#):
>
> This isn’t as hard as you’re making it out to be.

Ya know, you’d THINK that would be the case but here we are with people trying to redefine every word and concept under the sun to justify why they should be allowed to steal stuff and then, hilariously, accusing people of “outrage” for daring to point it out (and, in this case, pointing it out in a thread explicitly about the concept of piracy and entitlement).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2024, 3:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/212 "2024-05-27T15:26:20Z")

</div>

It’s not right, but it’s wrong for different reasons. If I steal bread from you, you are harmed because you no longer have the bread. That doesn’t apply to illegal possession of a _copy_ of something.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2024, 3:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/213 "2024-05-27T15:57:54Z")

</div>

It’s a question of entitlement and morality though, not legality. We agree that it’s wrong and, in a circumstance like this, someone knowingly doing wrong is doing so because they’ve convinced themselves that they’re entitled to the benefits regardless. Of course, they’re _not_ entitled – we’re talking entertainment media here, not bread withheld from starving orphans – but they want so they just steal it.

The rest of it is ad hoc rationalization about why it was okay (often phrased as “not as bad as…”) to steal stuff you didn’t need but just decided that you wanted.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jjakucyk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/3d9bf3/32.png) [@jjakucyk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jjakucyk)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2024, 4:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/214 "2024-05-27T16:42:30Z")

</div>

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> One act of piracy = One act of stealing stuff that doesn’t belong to you because of a juvenile sense of entitlement that you deserve other people’s work for free…

You keep assuming we’re trying to justify piracy. Stop jumping to conclusions.

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> > [@Mighty\_Mouse](#):
> >
> > Literally there is no “stuff”
> 
> Yeah, this is the thing that weirdly only gets trotted out during piracy discussions.

Because piracy is different, that’s why it has its own word.

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> …here we are with people trying to redefine every word and concept under the sun to justify why they should be allowed to steal stuff…

There you go again.

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> We agree that it’s wrong…

Make up your mind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2024, 4:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/215 "2024-05-27T16:59:03Z")

</div>

> [@jjakucyk](#):
>
> Because piracy is different, that’s why it has its own word.

It’s called piracy because it’s a copyright term that was applied to it. What kind of argument is that? “It’s not _really_ stealing because we use a word for people who steal stuff when discussing it”? Did you think that when real historical pirates stole stuff it didn’t count or something so now it’s an apt term for this?

The term itself as a description of copyright theft [dates back to 1706](https://www.etymonline.com/word/pirate) when real life piracy was still a thing and not just a cutesy term that one would equate to harmless shenanigans.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2024, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/216 "2024-05-27T22:36:17Z")

</div>

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> The only person who made a comparison like that was in defense of piracy (“It’s not $100 worth of baby food”) and any subsequent comparisons were in mockery of that defense.

Copyright violation is a different crime than theft. That’s not a defense of piracy, it’s simply a statement that everyone who is desperately trying to make copyright violation seem like a super important thing are grasping at straws by equating it to a crime that is actually important.

Copyright is a right granted to creators in order to incentivize creation. That’s it. That’s the sum total of its importance. Violating copyright is a crime that makes creating marginally less profitable. Big whoop.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2024, 11:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/217 "2024-05-27T23:10:14Z")

</div>

> [@Cheesesteak](#):
>
> everyone who is desperately trying to make copyright violation seem like a super important thing are grasping at straws by equating it to a crime that is actually important.

That would be… no one? Between this and the “outrage” nonsense earlier, I guess this is the part where people strawman that piracy isn’t worth the same concern as murder so checkmate?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2024, 6:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/218 "2024-05-28T18:43:16Z")

</div>

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> That would be… no one?

I’m talking about theft. Theft is a crime that is actually important, that we all agree is important, that has been considered important for thousands of years, such as when Hammurabi decreed that the punishment for theft in his realm would be death.

Intellectual Property is a new thing. Nobody patented the wheel, or the bow and arrow, there were industries based on copying pre-existing text. Information, if you could lay your hands on it, was yours to use.

Governments eventually, and correctly, decided that it makes sense to give creators legal protection, so that their ability to profit would encourage innovation. Which is fine, but that doesn’t make violating those protections “theft”. Even Hammurabi distinguished between thieves and people who trespassed on another’s land to harvest wood, or people who let their cattle graze on someone else’s field. Those criminals weren’t put to death for “stealing” wood or grass, they owed a penalty to the people who owned the property that they violated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stratocaster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stratocaster/32/16393_2.png) [@Stratocaster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stratocaster)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2024, 6:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/219 "2024-05-28T18:49:00Z")

</div>

Legal protection of IP is vital to modern society. Arguments over its proper statutory classification is one thing. Trivializing it is silliness.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2024, 7:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802/220 "2024-05-28T19:19:59Z")

</div>

> [@Stratocaster](#):
>
> Trivializing it is silliness.

So is demonizing it.

[Like here](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Taping_Is_Killing_Music)

and

[here](https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshbarro/2012/01/18/thirty-years-before-sopa-mpaa-feared-the-vcr/?sh=49aee0735c8d)

> [@](#):
>
> I say to you that the VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone…

Then Napster was going to kill music. Software companies lose $50B a year to pirates.

I’m amazed that anybody creates anything anymore, with all these industries killed over the last 40 years, and music was killed twice!

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802.md?page=10)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-something-being-high-cost-or-inconvenient-translate-into-entitlement/1001802.md?page=12)
