You know that Onion gag, “Kitten Thinks of Nothing but Murder All Day”?
The Roman state was like that.
John Keegan in A History of Warfare:
When all you can think about is stabbing, certain nuances get lost.
You know that Onion gag, “Kitten Thinks of Nothing but Murder All Day”?
The Roman state was like that.
John Keegan in A History of Warfare:
When all you can think about is stabbing, certain nuances get lost.
Isn’t the Baltics conversion later than that?
Actually, I do know a woman who is a practicing pagan, second generation here from Iceland, and they never stopped being pagan. Not sure how she justifies it, but that isn’t of particular interest to me.
As a heretic, I’m pretty mellow about what everybody else believes in. mrAru is what he jokingly calls ‘scots heretic’ [episcopalian] and we have an arrangement, I won’t feed him to the lions and he won’t burn me at the stake. It seems to work for us 
Actually, Iceland certainly did stop being pagan. Iceland was Christianized in 1000 AD, and in the 1500s had Lutheranism imposed by Denmark, which is the state religion to this day, and the vast majority of Icelanders are nominally Lutherans.
Any Icelanders who identify as pagans are neopagans who practice a reconstruction the ancient pagan religions.
Excuse me?
Damn, I love wikipedia:
Isn’t the Virgin Mary (at least the Catholic/Orthodox version) basically the goddess Isis under a new name?
No. Isis was an important figure in late Roman religion, and it’s likely that aspects of the feminine divine as expressed in the veneration of the Virgin Mary do date back to the worship of Isis, but it’s really simplistic to say that Isis became Mary. It ignores (1) the feminine divine in Roman paganism (Diana, Juno, Vesta, and the others) and (2) the explicitly Christian dichotomy between Eve (original bad mama) and Mary (redeeming supermom). Isis wasn’t split into those two poles.
Just to chime in here as well: as Lemur866 said, it’s simply not possible that her family wasn’t Christian. It’s an important part of Neopagan lore that their religion continued to be practiced in secret, particularly by women, and that it was “rediscovered” in the 20th century. Of course there would be no evidence: it was secret. So attempts to debunk hit a stone wall.
As a rule, from what evidence we do have:
Paganism was much more focused on practice than belief. Christianity is (somewhat) more focused on belief, especially in theory. So it’s pretty easy to keep doing some of the pagan stuff and become Christian. A lot of magical practices and festivals are thus pretty direct continuations of pagan practices. But after 1000 to 2000 years, Christianity penetrates to a fairly deep level, too. That’s like a fundie student of mine who proclaimed earnestly “but Christmas isn’t a Christian holiday!” Um, yes it is… now. That can change, too.
Once the hierarchies (political and otherwise) Christianized, there was a strong disincentive to be pagan. There was a strong incentive to be Christian, and often a financial one as well.
There’s nothing to say that a given Icelandic family couldn’t have kept alive most of their pagan practices. It’s less likely that they kept up the worship of the old gods, but not impossible. The Jewish conversos did for hundreds of years; why not Icelanders? But it’s far more likely that they took on their paganism in the 20th century as a heritage religion, telling themselves the polite fiction that they’d never given it up because of the customary areas in which there was continuity.
Dude, would it kill you to gather a few laurels?
There were certainly survivals of cult practices and stories/folklore recorded quite late – up to only a few centuries ago. But I don’t know if these practices date to Classical times or not. They’re certainly not Christian, but people did them “because they had always done them”. But even if these are legitimate survivals of Graeco-Roman (or even earlier) deity worship, they don’t seem to have been consciously recognized as such, so it’s not a full survival. Look in Fraser’s Golden Bough about St. John’s eve practices and the like, or in anthropologist’s or folkklorists’ records of European practices.
I don’t think anyone above mentioned the Emperor Julian, who came after Constantine and attempted to revive and re-establish the traditional worship of the gods:L
Julian’s own writings are still extant, and make interesting reading. Or you can read Gore Vidal’s novel of his life.
Julian’s death in 363 pretty much ended official support for the cults, though. And he didn’t live long enough to produce a serious re-establishment of them.
“What does God need with a spaceship?” – James T. Kirk, theologian 
I suppose it depends on your definition of “basically is,” to apply a little Clintonian metaphysics. Mary is Mary, seen by them as the holiest of the saints and honored by God, but not deified. Nonetheless, a fair amount of her cultus, both historically and in the present day, owes more than a little to Isis, Serapis, the Mater Deorum Magna (“Diana of the Ephesians”), and similar goddesses.