When did the Jews give up burnt offerings?

Perhaps it is heretical, and perhaps an artifact of my own ignorance and misunderstanding…

G-D allowed the First Temple to be destroyed.

A Second Temple was built, but destroyed a relatively short time later. G-d did nothing to stop this.

After that (if I remember the sequence correctly), first a Pagan Roman temple was built on the ruins, then Christians tore down that temple and built on the ruins, then the Muslims tore down that and built Al Aqsa on the rubble.

I’m beginning to think that maybe, just maybe, G-d does not want the Temple to be rebuilt? Because not only was the Second Temple allowed to be desecrated in a very horrific manner, but the whole build-crush-rebuild thing smells of overkill.

Or is it just me and this idea has never been proposed in Jewish thought?

Not officially, but I’m sure plenty of Jews have thought “So this Temple… is it going to be Orthodox, Conservative or Reform?”

Personally, as a Jew I’m not that crazy about the concept of a Third Temple. We’ve evolved a lot as a religion in the past 2000 years or so, and attempting to restore the old forms of worship would be, IMHO, a huge step backwards.

I’m sure it has been.

The idea reminds me of the the rabbis in Auschwitz who put God on trial and found him guilty of basically shitting the cosmic bed for allowing the holocaust to happen. After they found him guilty, they said evening prayers.

In other words, God’s motivations in allowing or not allowing something to happen aren’t super relevant to our day-to-day as Jews.

As a reconstructionist Jew, I agree wholeheartedly with this. Letting the religion evolve is kind of our whole bag.

Josephus goes on at some length about how the destruction of the Second Temple was evidently the will of God.

As a Schroedinger Jew, I look at the whole Bible/history thing and it occurs to me that the G-D of the Jews changes His mind from time to time as to how things should be. For awhile the Jews wandered around with no fixed home. Then they settle in one place and centralized on the Temple. Then, after the destruction of the Second Temple, it was back to wandering around again. Should they restore the centralized Olde Thyme Religion or go further back to the Really Olde Thyme Religion of pre-Temple days?

Or how about we try to live in the present?

Well, even more the notion of overkill. Seems to me G-d no longer wanted a Temple. And the second time around made sure of it.

Yes, in particular verses 8-11 of that chapter.

They are explicit that once the Temple was chosen things change, and that now everyone does what’s right in their own eyes because you haven’t come to the land that God chose, but once you are settled in the land then you can only do it in the place that God chose for it.

[Moderating]

What God wants is most assuredly not a Factual Question. If you wish to continue this line of conversation, create a new thread in Great Debates.

It’s unclear who/what this moderation is directed at.

What people believe(d) God wants is most definitely a factual question. What the bible says God wants is most definitely a factual question.

Yes, but what the destruction of the Temple implies about what God wants is not.

OK, so it appears that your moderation was aimed at Broomstick specifically. (That was not clear from your post.) Please clarify if otherwise.

No, that’s definitely one for IMHO.

In fact, the existence of God is one for IMHO.

The moderation was prompted by @Broomstick’s comments, but is directed at anyone who wishes to continue this line of conversation.