# When they say "for Pete's sake", who is pete?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-they-say-for-petes-sake-who-is-pete/368750>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [August 15, 2006, 1:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-they-say-for-petes-sake-who-is-pete/368750 "2006-08-15T01:28:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![diggleblop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ac91a4/32.png) [@diggleblop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/diggleblop)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2006, 1:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-they-say-for-petes-sake-who-is-pete/368750/1 "2006-08-15T01:28:46Z")

</div>

Who is he and why are they saying his name?

Another question about sayings. When someone is speaking about a subject or two, sometimes people say “and not to mention, \_\_\_\_\_\_\_” and then they mention it anyway.

Why do they do that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Strinka](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/strinka/32/512_2.png) [@Strinka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Strinka)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2006, 1:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-they-say-for-petes-sake-who-is-pete/368750/2 "2006-08-15T01:41:36Z")

</div>

I would guess they’re referring to the biblical Peter.

And the “not to mention” thing is just a figure of speech. It’s referring to the fact that the thing not mentioned wasn’t mentioned before they said it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spoke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a88e57/32.png) [@Spoke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spoke)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2006, 2:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-they-say-for-petes-sake-who-is-pete/368750/3 "2006-08-15T02:00:21Z")

</div>

It may be a corruption of “for pity’s sake.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spoke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a88e57/32.png) [@Spoke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spoke)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2006, 2:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-they-say-for-petes-sake-who-is-pete/368750/4 "2006-08-15T02:10:36Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=spoke-]  
It may be a corruption of “for pity’s sake.”  
[/QUOTE]

Oh yeah,  
[cite](http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0405a&L=worldwidewords&P=91).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![samclem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a9a28c/32.png) [@samclem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/samclem)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2006, 2:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-they-say-for-petes-sake-who-is-pete/368750/5 "2006-08-15T02:20:47Z")

</div>

[http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=355348&highlight=pete's+sake](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=355348&highlight=pete%27s+sake)

A previous thread which may give some enlightenment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![diggleblop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ac91a4/32.png) [@diggleblop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/diggleblop)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2006, 2:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-they-say-for-petes-sake-who-is-pete/368750/6 "2006-08-15T02:27:12Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=samclem]  
[http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=355348&highlight=pete's+sake](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=355348&highlight=pete%27s+sake)

A previous thread which may give some enlightenment.  
[/QUOTE]

DOH ! I should’ve used the search. ☹ Thanks !

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![garygnu](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/garygnu/32/2924_2.png) [@garygnu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/garygnu)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2006, 6:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-they-say-for-petes-sake-who-is-pete/368750/7 "2006-08-15T06:06:03Z")

</div>

My dad?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![diggleblop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ac91a4/32.png) [@diggleblop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/diggleblop)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2006, 6:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-they-say-for-petes-sake-who-is-pete/368750/8 "2006-08-15T06:09:44Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=garygnu]  
My dad?  
[/QUOTE]

That’s what I was thinkin..

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hawksgirl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/ed655f/32.png) [@hawksgirl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hawksgirl)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2006, 6:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-they-say-for-petes-sake-who-is-pete/368750/9 "2006-08-15T06:09:55Z")

</div>

He’s just this guy, you know?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AskNott](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asknott/32/5790_2.png) [@AskNott](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AskNott)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2006, 4:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-they-say-for-petes-sake-who-is-pete/368750/10 "2006-08-15T16:38:36Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=hawksgirl]  
He’s just this guy, you know?  
[/QUOTE]

I think you’re right. He’s like Al Gettout. 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CJJ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ecc23a/32.png) [@CJJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CJJ)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2006, 4:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-they-say-for-petes-sake-who-is-pete/368750/11 "2006-08-15T16:50:48Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=diggleblop]  
Another question about sayings. When someone is speaking about a subject or two, sometimes people say “and not to mention, \_\_\_\_\_\_\_” and then they mention it anyway.

Why do they do that?  
[/QUOTE]

As **Strinka** points out, this is a figure of speech, more specifically called [Paralipsis](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paralipsis).

Originally this was an ironic way of mentioning a bad quality of a person/thing without admitting you are mentioning it. However, “not to mention” has become such a cliche in modern English that it’s almost equivalent to “and”.
