For All Mankind was entirely stock footage.
I’m getting irked by the fact that most posters in this thread don’t know what stock is. I understand that most people don’t, because most people aren’t in fields where it’s meaningful. But stock is like, generic shots made to be used by those who don’t take the time to shoot their own. It’s the photography (or cinematography, or music) equivalent of clip art. It’s not historical news shots; it’s not reused shots. It’s a specific thing.
I think the 2014 film Lucy staring Scarlett Johansson used stock footage for some of its scenes (African Wildlife, maybe some generic office shots, I forget some of those montages).
And looking on the IMDB page under company credits the film does list at least two stock footage companies.
And then, more or less at random, I saw that Captain America: Civil War lists one company for stock footage, though off the top of my head I can’t think what scene that would be.
This is a guess, but I bet the use is probably more common than we think and might just be less noticeable due to better editing or CG.
Quick edit: It looks like Lucy had a budget of $40 million which is probably not a “big budget” movie these days. That said it was a mid-budget movie with a wide release, a big name star, and a well known director. It wasn’t a hit either, though I thought it had some interesting bits.
Cars 3 has old voice clips from Paul Newman, does that count?
I work for a stock footage company that deals mostly with historical images and we do use the term “stock” when referring to archival footage, as do many our clients when requesting footage.
I stand corrected, then.