Must…resist…temptation

Seriously, this may be your opinion, but you have no evidence for this and no way of knowing whether it is true. It is also in no way analogous to the Iraq situation.
Do you think the Iraqi people have a case for wondering what took you so long to get to them, then?
I say Taiwan or Singapore. Iraq will become a quiet industrial giant, shipping gobs of goods out through the Persian Sea.
I tried to answer a couple of nights ago, but apparently it never went through.
Thank you for correcting me, scr4.
In that case, given your location, perhaps you can offer knowledgable perspective:
My sense has been that the US military presence is absolutely essential in keeping democracy alive in South Korea, that it plays a key role in thwarting a real and immediate danger to that country’s freely elected government, which would fall to hostile forces almost instantly after our complete departure. (This is the position I fear we will end up in with Iraq).
Does it play an identical role in Japan, IYO?
Our willingness in WWII came from an unusual lack of moral ambiguity in the situation.
I won’t say our hands were squeaky clean, but they were relatively unsoiled. We did not actively place Hitler in power or officially support him materially once he was in control. We understood the political relationships between nations in the region. Corporations of the time probably had more to lose by taking him out than leaving him in. All possible diplomatic avenues had been exhausted with him, and we had been directly attacked by his ally, Japan. We went in with as strong a force as we could muster, under knowledgeable and capable leadership that did not let desire for re-election get in the way of desire for decisive victory. Our path then was about as clearly laid out as it could be.
Just when since 1945 have we had those elements lined up again?
Definitely a matter of perception. If we thought that the Brits and Canucks were goona take our stuff and do many other things under the banner of liberation as many Iraqis think of the US-led invasion…
Yes, it’s evidenced in this snippet:
*
If the US suffered a fascist takeover, and Canada and Britain invaded and toppled him, Americans would not resist, we’d be grateful. And if there were some McVeigh-type diehards committing terrorist acts, killing occupation troops, we’d be turning them in, not cheering them on.*
It all depends on the assessment of our actions and motives. We didn’t make the restoration of democracy in Iraq our main justification for the invasion now did we?