# Which Original Screenplay Oscar nominee would you vote for?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/which-original-screenplay-oscar-nominee-would-you-vote-for/527985>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [February 7, 2010, 2:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/which-original-screenplay-oscar-nominee-would-you-vote-for/527985 "2010-02-07T02:38:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MovieMogul](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f08c70/32.png) [@MovieMogul](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MovieMogul)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2010, 2:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/which-original-screenplay-oscar-nominee-would-you-vote-for/527985/1 "2010-02-07T02:38:03Z")

</div>

Who would get your vote? 2 of the nominees (the Coens and Tarantino) have won in this category before.

The Pixar nominees have previously been nominated for _Toy Story, Monsters Inc., Finding Nemo_ and/or _WALL-E_ but none have won.

The other 2 are first-time nominees.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Equipoise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/equipoise/32/151_2.png) [@Equipoise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Equipoise)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2010, 3:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/which-original-screenplay-oscar-nominee-would-you-vote-for/527985/2 "2010-02-07T03:24:50Z")

</div>

They’re all good, but I narrowed it down to **Inglorious Basterds** and **A Serious Man** pretty quickly because they’re the most complex and involving, IMO. **The Messenger** is pretty straightforward, and it’s mainly all about the acting. **The Hurt Locker** was mainly all about the directing and editing. **Up** is all about the Pixar animators making you believe the characters, and the screenplay goes somewhat south after the initial husband/wife montage. I liked them all though.

I chose **Inglorious Basterds** , and I hope Taratino wins again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2010, 3:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/which-original-screenplay-oscar-nominee-would-you-vote-for/527985/3 "2010-02-07T03:32:59Z")

</div>

_Basterd_, hands down. Tarantino delivered more tension and adrenaline with scenes of people just talking than any other movie of the year did with any amount of action. The use of multiple languages was also clever and intricate and mattered to the story (and is also one of the reasons Christoph Waltz is the biggest lock of the year in the acting categories).

_The Hurt Locker_ was more about the direction and observation of the character than the screenplay. The movie wasn’t driven by story or dialogue, but by imagery and tone.

_Up_ is a fucking cartoon. I cant take a screenplay for a cartoon seriously.

I haven’t seen _A serious Man_ yet, and the Coen brothers are masterful writers, so I may be missing the boat on that one, but I’d be surprised if the pages were as good as the ones for _Basterds_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![don\_t\_ask](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e68b1a/32.png) [@don\_t\_ask](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/don_t_ask)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2010, 3:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/which-original-screenplay-oscar-nominee-would-you-vote-for/527985/4 "2010-02-07T03:44:41Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> _Up_ is a fucking cartoon. I cant take a screenplay for a cartoon seriously.

That is a funny point of view by someone who thinks Tarantino should win.

Much as I love Tarantino movies, they are all cartoons. I can’t recall one even vaguely real character that he has ever written.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Equipoise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/equipoise/32/151_2.png) [@Equipoise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Equipoise)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2010, 3:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/which-original-screenplay-oscar-nominee-would-you-vote-for/527985/5 "2010-02-07T03:59:01Z")

</div>

> [@don\_t\_ask](#):
>
> Much as I love Tarantino movies, they are all cartoons. I can’t recall one even vaguely real character that he has ever written.

Jackie Brown.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![drm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a88e57/32.png) [@drm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/drm)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2010, 4:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/which-original-screenplay-oscar-nominee-would-you-vote-for/527985/6 "2010-02-07T04:04:22Z")

</div>

For those who know me, picking a Coen movie for original screenplay should hardly be a surprise…

Although, I may just watch Basterds right now, a great movie!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MovieMogul](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f08c70/32.png) [@MovieMogul](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MovieMogul)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2010, 6:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/which-original-screenplay-oscar-nominee-would-you-vote-for/527985/7 "2010-02-08T18:06:29Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> _Basterd_, hands down. Tarantino delivered more tension and adrenaline with scenes of people just talking than any other movie of the year did with any amount of action. The use of multiple languages was also clever and intricate and mattered to the story (and is also one of the reasons Christoph Waltz is the biggest lock of the year in the acting categories)…
> 
> I haven’t seen _A serious Man_ yet, and the Coen brothers are masterful writers, so I may be missing the boat on that one, but I’d be surprised if the pages were as good as the ones for _Basterds_

For me, the weakness of Tarantino’s script is in Waltz’s performance–he’s so good, that the moments without him show how slack the story often is. Make no mistake, there are some marvelously inspired setpieces, but for me, the whole is far less than the sum of its parts. The Coens may not deliver any bravura moments like _Basterds_ does, but the film is a finely-tuned swiss watch of construction, and while its story still echoes and resonates with me months later, _Inglorious_ virtually evaporated the instant I walked out of the theater. He’s good at finetuning moments, but I wished it was for something more substantial. As a fan of his early work, his WW2 pastiche feels like a monumental step down into irrelevancy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MovieMogul](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f08c70/32.png) [@MovieMogul](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MovieMogul)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2010, 5:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/which-original-screenplay-oscar-nominee-would-you-vote-for/527985/8 "2010-03-04T17:04:13Z")

</div>

bump

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tamerlane/32/7602_2.png) [@Tamerlane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamerlane)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2010, 5:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/which-original-screenplay-oscar-nominee-would-you-vote-for/527985/9 "2010-03-04T17:47:38Z")

</div>

> [@Equipoise](#):
>
> Jackie Brown.

I’m going to have to give at least partial credit on that one to [Elmore Leonard](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rum_Punch) ;).
