That and colored people:rolleyes:…
[Nelson Muntz]Stop throwing yourself against the police cruiser! Stop throwing yourself against the police cruiser![/N.M.]
Of course not. But again, that’s an opinion. Not a verifiable fact. He can’t prove that a card was taken. Do you not understand the concept of being able to prove ones claims?
ETA: it doesn’t matter if it’s the Pope making the claim on one side and a murdering rapist on the other. If he has no proof, then it’s just an allegation that is just as valid or invalid as the other sides claims until evidence shows which claim is factual. Sure, it’s much more likely that the journalist is telling the truth on this one. But that likelihood is not evidence.
He could bring a friend with him, and have the friend photograph the police confiscating his camera, but I don’t see that ending well.
It would have been cool if someone had caught it on video. Then released it to the press. Cops need to learn that the proliferation of everyone having a camera means that Little Brother is watching them and exercise some self-control.
F montgomery county, worse place in the entire DC region.
We would never see it because that person would now be missing his camera, too.
I guess I made my point badly. You were saying that the photographer didn’t have any proof what was on the memory card of his camera. But the claim is that the police took something they shouldn’t have. So what proof could he have had that they wouldn’t also have taken away?
Officer Swanhauser: Was the suspect colored?
Fred Sanford: Yeah, white.
None. And that’s a problem. It seems like journalists may have to start working in teams. One to keep a covert watch on the other so document things like this without the cops realizing it until later.
BTW, I’m from Montgomery Co and never had any problems with cops growing up. But I still have no problem believing the photographer. He just has the problem of no witnesses and no proof to back up his claims. Sucks for him.