# Who Are We Really Bailing Out with AIG?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [March 6, 2009, 3:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535 "2009-03-06T15:40:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AdmiralCrunch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/6f9a4e/32.png) [@AdmiralCrunch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AdmiralCrunch)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2009, 9:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/21 "2009-03-06T21:19:43Z")

</div>

> [@Rune](#):
>
> - don’t know that I’d take his word for it though. I’ve heard that the Chinese were putting on the thumbscrews too. In any case, you should have let it fail. Constructive destruction.

What are the Chinese going to do? Stop buying treasuries? They’re switched to short-term T-Bills, but they need the currency peg to keep subsidizing their export economy. And if they’re not hungry for Treasuries, the rest of the world is looking for safe money. They’d be pissed if we have hyperinflation, but they have more to lose if we break up Chimerica. As bad as it looks here, it looks a lot worse everywhere else.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2009, 9:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/22 "2009-03-06T21:24:03Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=AdmiralCrunch]  
What are the Chinese going to do? Stop buying treasuries? They’re switched to short-term T-Bills, but they need the currency peg to keep subsidizing their export economy. And if they’re not hungry for Treasuries, the rest of the world is looking for safe money. They’d be pissed if we have hyperinflation, but they have more to lose if we break up Chimerica.  
[/QUOTE]

Pretty much.

> [@](#):
>
> As bad as it looks here, it looks a lot worse everywhere else.

Something most American’s either don’t know or don’t understand…bad as it is here it’s a hell of a lot worse in a lot of other countries. My sister is in Ireland and according to her the economy seems to be completely melting down. She is actually scared and is considering moving back to the US at this point because things are getting so bad there.

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2009, 9:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/23 "2009-03-06T21:32:24Z")

</div>

Following up on previous post from _TPM_…

[http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/03/another\_view\_1.php](http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/03/another_view_1.php)

Summarized for the lazy…

The pros already have a pretty good idea about who’s got what, and all this maneuvering just gives them time to save their sorry assets.

> [@](#):
>
> …Namely, the folks working with the derivatives want them to be insurance when the issue is the ‘rights’ insurance has in bankruptcy proceedings but not be insurance when it comes to falling under the regulatory regimes that very tightly control actual insurance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveG1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@SteveG1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SteveG1)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2009, 10:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/24 "2009-03-06T22:13:58Z")

</div>

> [@xtisme](#):
>
> Pretty much.
> 
> Something most American’s either don’t know or don’t understand…bad as it is here it’s a hell of a lot worse in a lot of other countries. My sister is in Ireland and according to her the economy seems to be completely melting down. She is actually scared and is considering moving back to the US at this point because things are getting so bad there.
> 
> -XT

Even during the GREAT depression of 1929-1930something, the USA was still far better off that most other countries.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![E-Sabbath](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e19adc/32.png) [@E-Sabbath](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/E-Sabbath)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2009, 1:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/25 "2009-03-07T13:25:37Z")

</div>

Ireland, specifically, has been screwed for a while. Ever since Dell announced they were moving out?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ralph124c](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/8797f3/32.png) [@ralph124c](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ralph124c)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2009, 7:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/26 "2009-03-09T19:51:31Z")

</div>

Well among other things, AIG insures the pensions of retired german workers. So take heart American taxpayers-know that your taxes are going to support Herman and Hilda, as they retire to the South of France (at the age of 53), with full medical insurance!  
You American fools will be bagging groceries at Publix, at the age of 75, while Herman and Hilda relax in the sun!😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Burton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8e7dd6/32.png) [@Burton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Burton)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2009, 1:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/27 "2009-03-10T13:53:00Z")

</div>

> **[Who Got AIG Bailout Funds? Partial List of Firms Published](https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2009/03/09/98492.htm)**
>
> Where, oh where, did AIG's bailout billions go? That question may reverberate even louder through the halls of government in the week ahead now that a

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nars\_Glinley](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/nars_glinley/32/8177_2.png) [@Nars\_Glinley](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nars_Glinley)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2009, 2:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/28 "2009-03-10T14:31:39Z")

</div>

If AIG is the de facto FDIC of European banks, are European governments kicking in to save them as well? I’ve seen articles of other governments saving their banks but are they trying to save AIG like we are?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tagos](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bbe5ce/32.png) [@tagos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tagos)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2009, 3:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/29 "2009-03-10T15:11:00Z")

</div>

> [@KRM](#):
>
> If AIG is the de facto FDIC of European banks, are European governments kicking in to save them as well? I’ve seen articles of other governments saving their banks but are they trying to save AIG like we are?

Is the US bailing out European insurers?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![newcomer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/e5b9ba/32.png) [@newcomer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/newcomer)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2009, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/30 "2009-03-10T17:27:31Z")

</div>

What this tells us, I guess, is that when the economy is not in a downturn, everything’s fine. In other words, AIG gets monthly premiums for credit protection (insurance). However, when the bad times hit, the payouts start increasing in a domino effect fashion.

What happened in corporate defaults insurance world can be described as sudden increase in civilian population deaths that causes insurance companies to pay out huge amounts at one point in time under life insurance contracts. However, their premium to payout ratio was determined for peaceful times probabilities and not for say, war times. For example, 9/11 has caused great payouts to be made by insurers when compared to usual business but not to the extent that they couldn’t sustain.

What’s happening now is that suddenly there’s 10 or 20 9/11 scale of events in the corporate world. And they are still bleeding.

Seems to me that to stop the bleeding Government should help companies to stay afloat (i.e. not to resort to bankruptcy) rather than piling up public debt to payout insurance when they do. It is not just the loss of the monies for payouts but also loss of thousands of jobs that compounds the problem.

But then again, I may be wrong…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nars\_Glinley](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/nars_glinley/32/8177_2.png) [@Nars\_Glinley](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nars_Glinley)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2009, 5:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/31 "2009-03-10T17:56:01Z")

</div>

> [@tagos](#):
>
> Is the US bailing out European insurers?

To be perfectly honest, I don’t know. Are the European insurers the de facto FDIC for American banks?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![spazattak](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8e8cbc/32.png) [@spazattak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/spazattak)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2009, 6:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/32 "2009-03-10T18:41:32Z")

</div>

> [@newcomer](#):
>
> What this tells us, I guess, is that when the economy is not in a downturn, everything’s fine. In other words, AIG gets monthly premiums for credit protection (insurance). However, when the bad times hit, the payouts start increasing in a domino effect fashion.
> 
> What happened in corporate defaults insurance world can be described as sudden increase in civilian population deaths that causes insurance companies to pay out huge amounts at one point in time under life insurance contracts. However, their premium to payout ratio was determined for peaceful times probabilities and not for say, war times. For example, 9/11 has caused great payouts to be made by insurers when compared to usual business but not to the extent that they couldn’t sustain.
> 
> What’s happening now is that suddenly there’s 10 or 20 9/11 scale of events in the corporate world. And they are still bleeding.
> 
> Seems to me that to stop the bleeding Government should help companies to stay afloat (i.e. not to resort to bankruptcy) rather than piling up public debt to payout insurance when they do. It is not just the loss of the monies for payouts but also loss of thousands of jobs that compounds the problem.
> 
> But then again, I may be wrong…

I think you’re right up to that last paragraph. I don’t think it’s the companies going under that’s causing the problem - it’s the investments going under that’s triggering the payouts on the credit-default policies. Or am I the one that’s wrong here..

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![newcomer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/e5b9ba/32.png) [@newcomer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/newcomer)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2009, 6:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/33 "2009-03-10T18:59:12Z")

</div>

> [@spazattak](#):
>
> I think you’re right up to that last paragraph. I don’t think it’s the companies going under that’s causing the problem - it’s the investments going under that’s triggering the payouts on the credit-default policies. Or am I the one that’s wrong here..

Well, my understanding of the credit default swap is that essentially the credit protection seller (AIG) insures some credit protection buyer (BoA) portfolio (e.g. corporate loans or some well-defined subset of it). The contract says that if a certain credit event occurs - a bankruptcy of some counterparty (e.g. GE) in the credit protection buyer (BoA) loan portfolio - credit protection seller (AIG) will take care of the remaining balance (insurance payout) thus credit protection buyer (BoA) has no loss.

Now, going back to my previous post last paragraph, instead of Government putting up the money to credit protection seller to stay afloat by footing the insurance payout, why not helping counterparty not to default. It might actually cost less.

Similar to handling of the sub-prime mortgage defaulting. The reason Mortgage Backed Securities are “toxic” is because cancer was allowed to reach a point of no return; i.e. we are counting days until death rather than counting days until full recovery. Yes, “cancer treatment” would be costly but certainly not at this rate.

But then again, what do I know…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveG1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@SteveG1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SteveG1)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2009, 7:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/34 "2009-03-10T19:30:34Z")

</div>

> [@ralph124c](#):
>
> Well among other things, AIG insures the pensions of retired german workers. So take heart American taxpayers-know that your taxes are going to support Herman and Hilda, as they retire to the South of France (at the age of 53), with full medical insurance!  
> You American fools will be bagging groceries at Publix, at the age of 75, while Herman and Hilda relax in the sun!😃

Hmmmm.

maybe we can all move to Germany when the time is right?  
Guten Tag.

Wie gehts?

Gut? Ja, sehr gut.

😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![msmith537](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d9b06d/32.png) [@msmith537](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/msmith537)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2009, 7:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/35 "2009-03-10T19:37:10Z")

</div>

> [@KRM](#):
>
> To be perfectly honest, I don’t know. Are the European insurers the de facto FDIC for American banks?

Wouldn’t that be the actual FDIC?

> [@ralph124c](#):
>
> Well among other things, AIG insures the pensions of retired german workers. So take heart American taxpayers-know that your taxes are going to support Herman and Hilda, as they retire to the South of France (at the age of 53), with full medical insurance!  
> You American fools will be bagging groceries at Publix, at the age of 75, while Herman and Hilda relax in the sun!

Oh. Well how evil can they be if the are involved with the Germans?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Honesty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f04885/32.png) [@Honesty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Honesty)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2009, 7:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/36 "2009-03-10T19:52:50Z")

</div>

\<sigh\> These bailouts get tiresome just to hear about. Why can’t we just nationalize AIG for a hundred years and then release them. It worked for the USPS, right? Right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![spazattak](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8e8cbc/32.png) [@spazattak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/spazattak)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2009, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/37 "2009-03-10T20:24:59Z")

</div>

> [@newcomer](#):
>
> Well, my understanding of the credit default swap is that essentially the credit protection seller (AIG) insures some credit protection buyer (BoA) portfolio (e.g. corporate loans or some well-defined subset of it). The contract says that if a certain credit event occurs - a bankruptcy of some counterparty (e.g. GE) in the credit protection buyer (BoA) loan portfolio - credit protection seller (AIG) will take care of the remaining balance (insurance payout) thus credit protection buyer (BoA) has no loss.
> 
> Now, going back to my previous post last paragraph, instead of Government putting up the money to credit protection seller to stay afloat by footing the insurance payout, why not helping counterparty not to default. It might actually cost less.
> 
> Similar to handling of the sub-prime mortgage defaulting. The reason Mortgage Backed Securities are “toxic” is because cancer was allowed to reach a point of no return; i.e. we are counting days until death rather than counting days until full recovery. Yes, “cancer treatment” would be costly but certainly not at this rate.
> 
> But then again, what do I know…

Then which bankruptcies have triggered the insurance payouts? I figure Lehman has definitely caused some problems, but AIG was in trouble before Lehman collapsed. I’m pulling the [credit default swap](http://www.cftc.gov/educationcenter/glossary/glossary_co.html) definition from a US Commodities Futures Trading Commission website (emphasis mine):

> [@](#):
>
> Credit Default Swap: A bilateral over-the-counter (OTC) contract in which the seller agrees to make a payment to the buyer \*\*in the event of a specified credit event \*\*in exchange for a fixed payment or series of fixed payments; the most common type of credit derivative; also called credit swap; similar to credit default option.

The 2 trillion dollar question: What are the specific credit event(s) that trigger payment? Is it related to the value of the derivatives (ie, the complaints about mark-to-market), or like you say, bankruptcy of portions of the portfolio? Or both?

My biggest problem with all of this is that conceptually, it’s all just numbers on a spreadsheet. To me it just seems like monopoly money. These credit default swaps are based on practically nothing. They started out very small and ended up huge based on nothing but speculation, with nothing backing them. I’m convinced there’s a simple way to return what started out as nothing, back to nothing while pissing off a very small number of people by breaking some rules of accounting and suspending assumptions/consequences about profits and losses for 3-6 months - but maybe that’s impossible and I’m just being naive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DanBlather](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/f4b2a3/32.png) [@DanBlather](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DanBlather)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2009, 4:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/38 "2009-03-11T04:34:46Z")

</div>

> [@elucidator](#):
>
> I am the government! _You_ are the government! WE have the right to know! And somebody doesn’t want us to. As a general rule of thumb, when the powers that be would prefer that I be shielded from some dangerous truth, that is precisely the truth I demand to hear.

Damn right! BTW, where did I put those launch codes?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leaper](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/4bbf92/32.png) [@Leaper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leaper)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2009, 2:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/39 "2009-03-16T02:23:17Z")

</div>

[CNN: AIG names names](http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/03/15/AIG.banks.list/index.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RitterSport](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rittersport/32/6326_2.png) [@RitterSport](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RitterSport)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2009, 2:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535/40 "2009-03-16T14:10:38Z")

</div>

> [@spazattak](#):
>
> Then which bankruptcies have triggered the insurance payouts?

I suspect that it’s the collateral requirements that have caused many of the problems at AIG. Let’s say I sell you a credit default swap, so I’ll pay you if, say, GE defaults, and you pay me a monthly premium.

When I sell the CDS, GE spreads (how much I charge you for the protection) are, say, 0.50%. Now, if the market thinks that GE is in trouble, that spread may move out to 1%. However, I’m still only collecting 0.50% from you. Now, that swap is worth some money, and you don’t necessarily believe I will have the ability to pay, even if I’m AAA rated, so I have to put some money up as collateral, in case I need to pay in the event of GE’s default.

Of course, I don’t have all of this collateral just hanging around, so I have to raise capital to post it, or borrow money, or something.

In AIG’s case, not only did credit spreads widen all over the place (causing them to post collateral), but they got downgraded. If I’m your counterparty, I may accept less collateral from you when you’re AAA than when you’re A-. So, at the same time that market spreads were widening, AIG’s rating was under pressure, causing a double-whammy.

In order to post all of that collateral, AIG had to raise capital or borrow money, putting even more pressure on the rating, and the spiral continued.

AIG was depending on its rating (AAA, in the old days) to issue the swaps that it did. Many people thought that their rating was binary – they were OK as long as they were AAA, but if they got downgraded, they would basically do a death spiral.

That’s different than other, non-financial companies – a retailer doesn’t depend on its rating to survive (though higher ratings give it lower costs, of course). Even GE can survive without its AAA rating, since it also makes jet engines, light bulbs, television shows, etc. However, the GE Capital arm could be badly hurt by the recent downgrade.

AIG really couldn’t survive without it.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-are-we-really-bailing-out-with-aig/488535.md?page=1)
