# Who cares to debate the events of 9/11/2001 based upon the laws of physics?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-cares-to-debate-the-events-of-9-11-2001-based-upon-the-laws-of-physics/798861>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [October 14, 2017, 9:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-cares-to-debate-the-events-of-9-11-2001-based-upon-the-laws-of-physics/798861 "2017-10-14T21:40:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 961

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)\
**Post date:** [October 17, 2017, 4:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-cares-to-debate-the-events-of-9-11-2001-based-upon-the-laws-of-physics/798861/961 "2017-10-17T04:08:43Z")

</div>

> [@Jay\_Jay](#):
>
> so, do you understand that anything descending at 64% if the  
> acceleration of gravity is only exerting 36% of its weight on  
> whatever is below it?
> 
> or do you consider this to be a “joke”
> 
> what?

I had a post composed of all the questions you’ve posed, but it got really really long. What I surmised from that is that rather than witnessing or genuine debate, this is mostly just JAQing (Just Asking Questions).

I’m going to try new approach - in this thread you’ve asked many questions for which you’ve been provided answers and responses. You’ve received many questions which you haven’t responded to. **Going forward in this thread you may not ask any additional questions**. You can make statements and respond to others, but no more questions from you in this thread.

[/moderating]

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-cares-to-debate-the-events-of-9-11-2001-based-upon-the-laws-of-physics/798861)._