# Who cares to debate the events of 9/11/2001 based upon the laws of physics?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-cares-to-debate-the-events-of-9-11-2001-based-upon-the-laws-of-physics/798861>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [October 14, 2017, 9:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-cares-to-debate-the-events-of-9-11-2001-based-upon-the-laws-of-physics/798861 "2017-10-14T21:40:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 967

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jay\_Jay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Jay\_Jay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jay_Jay)\
**Post date:** [October 17, 2017, 4:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-cares-to-debate-the-events-of-9-11-2001-based-upon-the-laws-of-physics/798861/967 "2017-10-17T04:24:35Z")

</div>

> [@GIGObuster](#):
>
> As we have seen you are relying with arguments that climate change deniers or creationists would make. That is not making arguments based on reality, but on obfuscation.

so in terms of the proof beyond any doubt that 9/11/2001 = FALSE FLAG

there is the 2.25 sec of FREE FALL for WTC7  
there is the obviously fake “FLT175” video  
there is the Towers descending straight down @ 64% of the acceleration of gravity

what does it take to get people to at least question this farce?

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-cares-to-debate-the-events-of-9-11-2001-based-upon-the-laws-of-physics/798861)._