Have you ever been in an automobile and have had to make a “panic stop” from highway speed? What happens to all the stuff in the car, anything loose shifts, right,(?)
so this is in the case of something happening that is <3 g
now in the case of the airliner, it can be shown that the deceleration force would have had to be >45 g, and at that magnitude the aircraft itself would break apart from the forces imposed.
What does this even mean?
also it has been stated that firing a marshmallow at steel plate at sufficient speed would make it penetrate said steel plate, and I would like to see experimental confirmation of that ( what none is available … oh my … )
and really is all of the fluff postings in this thread simply an avoidance technique
so you don’t have to actually look at the fact that the media reports on what happened that day are totally fraudulent (?)
what?
It kind of did.
But at the same time it delviered much of its kinetic energy to the building,
WHy is this hard to understand?
No, what are YOU talking about?
The entire plane was moving at X mph. Not just the front tip of the plane. Not just the part of the plane that first made contact. The ENTIRE AIRPLANE, FFS.
I believe you’ve missed my earlier introduction of Irony to you, Mr. Johnson.
It does show that a fragile object, when moving fast enough, can punch through a strong material.
Notice the impact even snapped the paddle off the handle.
Or did you bother to watch?
I’m sure a Mac will hit harder than the Orange.
First, take a look for some videos of high velocity water being used to cut still.
Then realize that that beyond certain speeds it really doesn’t matter what the oject at super high velocity is made of, it is going to go through
You started a thread about the physics of 9/11 and now want to whine about the media. Gotcha.
So what? It still goes through the wall. Did you see in the video of the ping-pong ball that it broke apart? Did you see that it went straight through the bat and left a nice ping-pong ball shaped hole anyway?
The damning evidence is in the video of the alleged FLT175 penetrating the south wall of the south tower, given that the airliner would have to undergo very serious deceleration upon impact with the wall ( >45 g ) the airliner could not possibly be expected to keep its shape as it progressed, and therefore is bogus, a broken up aircraft doesn’t leave a wing shaped gash as was alleged to have been made by airliners in the sides of WTC 1 & 2 .
/fires high velocity orange cannon at running coach
Ping Pong balls do not have wings …
I rest my case …
Still no math huh? I’m becoming less shocked, but no less disappointed.
OK, let me see if I understand the nonsense you are complaining about.
Your complaint is: The hole in the building is too close to being plane-shaped for your comfort. Is that correct? Am I on the right track here? Otherwise get to the point, please.
Fishes are not wishes, so what?
The jury would find you guilty and give your the death penalty for a parking ticket if this is how you rest cases.
The water cutting of metal as an industrial process requires a water jet nozzle to be placed very close to the metal to be cut and the whole thing requires a special set-up that does in no way resemble the conditions encountered in an airliner crash
Are you fucking kidding?
so in other words, you really do NOT want to actually address issues here
you are only on this forum to increase the noise level … .right?
I see now. You must be citing from the Wile E Coyote Super Genius School of Cartoon Physics.
No…No…No… He rests his case. Discussion over. J_J is the official winner of the internet today. Sorry, coach. Better luck next time.