What “uniformity of the ‘collapse’” are you claiming?
Every collapse video I have seen shows the buildings tottering slightly at an angle as the collapse begins. However, once the failure is established, everything above the point of failure starts down. I suspect that you do not realize that each floor of both towers was about an acre in area. What do you think is going to cause acres of material to shift to an angle while it is collapsing? What is providing the force to move acres (one acre times each floor) to shift sideways when gravity is pulling it down?
This is like your nonsense claim about the strength of the walls. Regardless how strong any pillar might be, each pillar was multiple feet away from any neighboring pillar (the buildings were celebrated for their open design that lacked interior pillars while providing large, airy windows). The planes needed only take out the individual pillars in front of them, something that pieces of aluminum over 100 feet long (fuselage) and 20+ feet of reinforced aluminum holding a couple of really heavy engine pods is quite capable of doing. The WTC walls were not built with the pillars side by side like a palisade, they were spaced out to allow lots of light to come through. You appear to think that they were built like fortress walls.
Now, you are correct that the pillars were strong.
That is why even as the planes tore through them, they also shredded the planes. (The following video demonstrates that action.)
However, they were not impervious to other forces and your attempt to dismiss the planes force just because they were aluminum is silly.
(Not that I think that presenting facts will be of much use as you have already proved to be impervious to facts.)
Here is one of the three zillion videos of the fall of tower one. Please explain what you mean by “uniformity of the collapse”. Because, what I see is much shit flying away from the tower in every direction. Much shit.
This video is not consistent with a controlled demolition with charges. A controlled demolition begins from the lower floors. There is no sign, at all, of anything happening below the pancake line as it traverses down the building.
What do you see? Is this video faked or doctored? If you think so, please point us toward what you think indicates manipulation.
because it wasn’t the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao. The WTC buildings were built square and tall with uniform construction all the way down. Once the upper floors collapsed the buildings were jack hammered down one floor at a time. The weight of the floor crushed added to the increased speed as it decended.
I’ve already asked you 4 times what made the plane shaped holes in the buildings at the precise location where the planes struck the buildings.
Obviously not but the principle remains the same. If anything, the higher speed will provide more momentum to move the smaller weight.
In fact, at a high enough speed, even lightweight materials willl cut through heavier ones. Like aluminum through steel. Something else to consider. When the leading edge of the wings struck the Tower, the force is concentrated along a very narrow point of contact, increasing the ability to cut through. Think of a giant knife or sword.
Ditto for the nose of the plane.
Another way to visualize is a high diver hitting the water. If s/he hits with hands together in a point, there’s a smoother entry than if the palms are presented to the water surface.
Quoted for emphasis.
So far, you’ve provided nothing.
We, on the other hand, have provided video, material evidence, news reports, research papers that hold up and use real-world science. Your only rebuttal boils down to :“That was all planted by the conspiracy!” You offer not a shred of evidence of this conspiracy yet you believe it exists.
What convinced you?
You’ve argued with multiple pilots about aircraft, and ignored multiple math equations. You’ve ignored the obvious visual examples people have linked showing the damaged building with supports severed… You’ve ignored the video showing the building collapsing from the location of the damage.
For starters, you have a poor grasp of mathematics. Then, you seem to think that a big, strong building, designed to handle vertical loads, must also be good at handling lateral loads – partially based on a number that is not applicable to where you are applying it. Your general understanding of physics is lamentable (this from a person who took one year of HS physics decades ago and can see your errors). You seem to posit demolition charges where there is zero-to-negative evidence for that. And you are unaware of actual facts that others have pointed out, meaning that your research is incomplete or not competently carried out.
“you don’t have anything” is the apex of ironic statements.
Very simple, in the video of the alleged “FLT175”
the airliner allegedly cuts through the wall and penetrates with
no visible deceleration, no loss of parts, as in the initial jolt breaking off the jet engines and said engines ending up in the street below. airliner penetrates completely disappearing inside the building. Note that given the fact that resistance to not only penetration but continuous resistance to further entry would be the case and this would deplete the KE of the airliner so that there would be progressively less and less energy available to propel the airliner into the building.
All of the anomalies of 9/11/2001 add up to something that just screams fraud, however people are resistant, most people are going to say that there isn’t anything at all the tiniest bit suspicious about the events of 9/11/2001.
…
So to be clear, what you’re saying is that the plane should have shattered against the side of the building, causing massive damage, but leaving the tower mostly intact?
You’re claiming that someone faked the whole thing and nobody in the city says different. Do you believe the entire population of NYC is in on it?
Are you saying the thousands of witnesses are all lying?
Can you describe how the videos were faked and yet not one person has come forward to refute it?
All the debris and recovered plane parts were planted without being seen?