So you’re saying hundreds of thousands upon thousands of physicists and architects around the world who disagree are… what? Incompetent? Lying? Paid off?
how much of what wreckage was photographed and was that ALL of the wreckage that was found? if the photos are ALL that we have, its damn little, and does NOT in any way prove that there ever was an airliner crashed at the alleged crash site.
first of all, we are talking about a fundamental principle that is
any physical object descending at 64% of the acceleration of gravity
is only exerting 36% of its own weight on whatever is under it.
and that is NOT something that any actual physics professor would dispute.
also, on the subject of the more general 9/11 was a FALSE FLAG
the vast majority of professional if asked would refuse to commit to any sort of answer
or would say that the official story is true ( even if deep in their hearts they know otherwise ) The few who have weighed in on one side or the other of this argument are a VERY small minority of the people who are technically qualified to make a statement …
(however the vast majority of sentient beings on this planet are technically qualified to get this )
Aside from what any given “expert” may offer, what does the j-random
rank&file citizen have to say on the subject?
I don’t follow any of this. I say that if basic physics knowledge is all you need to conclude that no planes hit the towers, that this should be universally accepted among scientists because it is what it is. Therefore, I asked why, if basic physics knowledge is all you need to conclude that no planes hit the towers, nobody else except a small core of conspiracy theorists think it’s so.
Your response doesn’t seem to address any of what I asked directly, which is odd, considering you came in here with the intent of debating based on science knowledge. We’re not talking about the “official story” here; we’re talking about the basic knowledge of science that you yourself brought into play.
There was not that many G’s on the wings at all until they (the wings) hit the building. And even if they experienced 3-4 g’s, that may do nothing other than damage fuel lines and such.
ALSO, fuel needs air to burn, lots of it. And jet fuel isn’t particularly easy to ignite. It’s basically kerosene/diesel. So even if a thousand gallons burst out as the nose hit the building (very, very doubtful.) There would be NO reason for it to ignite. Why would it?
I know what I wrote,
about how something descending at 64% of the acceleration of gravity…
however, what does “the core of the buildings did not do that”
what is singling out the core have to do with this?
I’m referencing the total “collapse” event…
Why did the US government orchestrate the events of 9/11?
Who were the major players involved in the planning and execution of these events?
What did they gain by doing so?
Why do subsequent administrations continue to cover it up?
What evidence exists for the orchestration and the on going cover-up?
Where did you first learn of this?
Has anyone actively encouraged you to promote these ideas?
If so, who or what organization do they represent?
Do you worry that the gov’t might retaliate against you in some way for uncovering ‘the truth’, as you understand it?
you say 3 - 4 g’s …
do you understand that the nose to wall initial jolt would have to be hundreds of g’s?
and the jet engines would be the ignition source and if not the engines, then there would be lots of opportunity for electrical arc as the plane was stressed beyond its capacity to remain whole.
I would not be surprised that he is relying on the “evidence” of truthers about the pentagon that show images of relatively small holes, usually like 2 windows on the second floor. Of course those truthers do delude many by not showing that most of the damage did happen on the first floor.
the actual reason is because of the psychological warfare going on.
nobody wants to be labeled a conspiracy freak.
however, no matter what, there are those of us who love our country so much
that it doesn’t matter if you have to say “conspiracy freak” the message is very clear, the media LIED to everybody about the events of 9/11
Wow. Someone posted something so ignorant that it fell to you to correct it. I’m mighty impressed. This is the first true thing you’ve posted in this entire thread.
(Also, don’t overlook the electrical lines all through the building, powering lights, air conditioning, elevators, pencil-sharpeners, etc. Lots and lots of sources of electrical ignition.)
