The “Jet”.
Excuse me but no Trinopus. That while the nose at impact as it was crushed penetrating the building encountered perhaps 100’s of g’s the wings certainly did not. Greater G’s would occur in the nose as it crumpled and PARTS of the airplane stopped while the rest of the plane continued. Think of crumple zones in cars. If the entire plane had encountered 100 g’s all at once, when the nose touched the building, it would have pretty much shattered. Like an icicle falling from a great height.
And no, not enough fuel air mixture would occur to be ignited by either a short or wire or an engine to be seen before it entered the building a few milliseconds later.
OK, so some of the floors of WTC 7 fell in an essentially free fall situation for a few seconds after the supporting structure beneath them collapsed. So what?
The physical reason this happened was due to gravity, and because of the “exterior columns buckling and losing their capacity to support the loads from the structure above” after seven hours of building fires that were set by the collapse of WTC 1.
There are no so-called “laws of physics” that state this could only be due to “some sort of engineered demolition.”
Plus, what was basically in ‘free fall’ was part of the outer façade after the rest of the building collapsed and knocked the bottom part of the façade out. This idea that the two towers fell in free fall has been debunked many times, so the last gasp of this is WTC 7, and only if we look at one video from one view point…and don’t understand what was actually happening. It’s all in the NIST report you cited, but the OP would actually have to read it, as opposed to some talking points some CTer regurgitated to him or her.
I just flashed on how mother birds feed their chicks.
So, thought I’d link to this for the OP since he or she seems to be having issues understanding what happens when a plane hits a building. This is from the 1945 B-25 accident with the Empire State Building. Here is a plane that weighed 20,000 lbs (as opposed to over 200k) and flew at around 200 MPH (instead of 500 MPH) and flew into a building that was of much heavier construction, yet it went through the façade (and exploded inside), and through 7 additional walls. I doubt the OP will watch this video either, but for anyone else interested it’s got actual footage of the inside (it’s actually a period war time documentary and kind of cool someone put this up on YouTube).
I know this will be lost on the OP, but here we have a plane literally an order of magnitude more massive flying at double the speed into a building with a much lighter façade and just lighter construction. The only mystery is why the OP can’t grasp this despite multiple people trying to explain this in multiple ways.
I shudder to think how Alex Jones (who is probably where the OP is getting some of this crap) does this…
:eek:
okee dokey. I guess I was too late. Have fun, y’all.
Initial Jolt? So what? A plane is not a crystal, or solid object.
Yes, I very much doubt that the wings experienced more than 3 - 4 g’s transmitted through the airframe as the nose disintegrated and punched through the building. The wings experience whatever 100’s of g’s when the wings hit the building. Spilled fuel that was then mixed with air under tremendous pressure and ignited And effectively stopped in 50-200 feet (some pieces of plane penetrated all the way through). The wings where still going ~ 500 mph when they hit the building.
I also doubt that a fuel tank would rupture and explode in the few milliseconds before the wings hit the building. Not enough time to mix with air. And as all evidence clearly shows, they did not.
Haven’t you ever seen a movie? Gas tanks ALWAYS explode on impact (in milliseconds of course :p). Also, if you shoot a bullet anywhere near a car it explodes, plus the hero (such as our favorite OP here) always gets the girl (or guy) and is just smarter than everyone else.
But, yeah, that’s in the movies. In reality gas tanks don’t explode on impact (again, OP, note the Empire State Building video and note that it exploded inside…a much smaller speed impact with much less mass, and, oh yeah, much less fuel) and even if the gas tanks were shredded when the plane hit the façade the fuel itself was also traveling at 500 miles per hour (that, btw, is over 700 feet per second) and would continue into the building before finally mixing enough to ignite (yeah, gas doesn’t ignite like in the movies either…that pesky stoichiometry stuff).
Note that both the planes that hit the WTC towers were flights from Boston to Los Angeles: their fuel tanks would have been around half to two-thirds full (one of the planes was a 767-200ER with almost twice the range of the other). The plane that hit the ESB was enroute from northeast Massachusetts to Newark, so its tanks would have been very low (gasoline vapor is still quite explosive), as would have been its speed, being about 10 miles from its destination.
My bad. I can’t tpye.
No, but you are. There were hundreds of photos from many different sources showing the airliners hitting the second tower. Are you claiming that every single one of those pictures is fake?
I did not intend to imply total blame when I mentioned the cover-up
the ONLY thing that can be certain is that the administration is complicit in a cover-up.
to assign blame would be speculation.
wow man, another computer generated cartoon …
But this doesn’t make any sense; if it were scientifically provable that no planes hit the towers, nobody would be labeling anybody a “conspiracy freak,” because you’d have IRREFUTABLE scientific proof that would immediately be apparent to anyone with the right training across the globe. It’d be like saying that it’s trivially provable that the sun revolves around the earth, but the astronomical community doesn’t say anything for fear of being called crazy.
so, do you understand that anything descending at 64% if the
acceleration of gravity is only exerting 36% of its weight on
whatever is below it?
or do you consider this to be a “joke”
what?
note that photos and video are all too easy to fake,
and in the face of the overwhelming evidence in the form of
how the alleged airliner behaved in the alleged crash into the
south wall of the south tower, its obvious that there is a LOT
more going on here, that is psychological warfare to keep the
masses in line so as to not rock the boat for the people who
at least think they own this planet.
I don’t think you exist. I think these posts are fake.
Yes, it remains a joke. You look like someone that that wants to use the same hammer when not everything is a nail.