You should care because the media has supported a LIE,
why tell the world that WTC7 “collapsed” when it was blown up?
BTW: the towers were also blown up.
The segment with Banfield, those were not explosions. Explosions are sharp cracks and wouldn’t be that faint.
There’s nothing to tie those claims of explosions with the video record.
Got a link to the collapse with the actual sound? Those people who claimed to hear explosions? Could it be things like propane tanks or such?
Note in the demolition video I linked, the blasts are sharp, evenly spaced in a pattern, not random.
With or without any recorded soundtrack of explosions,
there is no excuse ( other that Controlled Demolition ) for the fall of WTC7 in the manner that was observed.
Yes they were. With passenger airplanes.
Prove it. Video with a clear unedited soundtrack of the demolition charges.
You’re making the claim, you bring the proof.
Why were they allegedly blown up from the top? Didn’t hear any explosions there, either.
Ah, yes. Hulsey’s sponsered ‘study’. After over two years of saying how open they would be they hid everything but some YouTube posts and when they finally released their preliminary report it was debunked almost immediately.
The airliners were fake, and the proof of that fact is in the fraudulent video alleging to show an airliner penetrating the south wall of the south tower.
there was no accounting for the resistance to penetration that the skyscraper would have presented.
That’s not proof.
If they’re not airliners, what are they?
Metabunk can complain all they want
the critical piece of INFORMATION here is the fact that the building spent 2.25 sec in FREE FALL. end of story!
Alright, Jay_Jay. You win. I was recently diagnosed with a terminal illness, so I’m gonna level with you.
I was part of Operation Blackbox, a secret government task force to fake the 9/11 attacks. Ask me anything.
A few things :
- Those airplanes, despite weighing 98,000 lbs after we disposed of the passengers and got them ready for the mission, crumpled like aluminum foil when we hit the towers. Had to time the explosion just right.
- The charges in WTC7 were supposed to go off at the same time as the North Tower collapse. But the collapse took out our detonation wiring, which ran through the subway tunnels! We had to sneak an operative in to light the backup fuse. Our bad, it looked awful suspicious
- The airliners weren’t fake, we did use real planes.
- Some of the workers clearing the sight saw more than they shouldn’t have. We have an aerosol mist that can give someone cancer, so we had some of our agents set off some misters in their tents.
- We didn’t actually fake the Flight 93 cell phone calls. We rigged the plane with a mobile cell tower to make sure the calls went through.
- Why did we do it? To drum up support for the invasion of Saudi Arabia, of course. That was our original plan. Start a war with Saudi Arabia, seize all their oil, and make the Bush family rich. Also, get them reelected.
- The charges we actually used were linear cutting charges on the bolts holding up each floor. That’s why it collapsed so fast - we have them installed on every floor. We put them in during ‘fireproofing’ upgrades to the ceiling. The fireproofing was actually a special mixture containing thermite. The jet fuel fire was just the initiator for the thermite.
- Back in 2001, autopilots weren’t very good. We actually had pilots steer the aircraft remotely.
I’ll answer more of your questions when I can, need to go for a round of chemo.
As I have stated before, it is possible to know what something isn’t
without having to explain what it is.
What we are seeing in the video
is clearly fake, the wall would have presented sufficient resistance to decelerate a real airliner by a minimum of 1 mph/millisecond resulting in >45 g force applied to the aircraft.
L0L!
Wow. Looks like an airplane to me. If you claim it’s something else, then you’ve seen a video of the actual object. Post it.
Where did you get those latest figures? Why do they keep changing?
And you’ve been shown ample proof of how relatively flimsy items can penetrate strong marterials at very high speeds.
NM
He thinks that proves it’s a controlled demolition. Won’t explain how that works.
That “NM” wasn’t there a second ago. 
That is not the trump card you think it is.
Read the NIST report.
The short version is that the Free Falling you are harping on is merely the exterior skin of the building falling because the interior structure had already failed and fallen or was falling. Without it there was little to resist the falling of the building skin.
This is a warning for failure to follow a moderator’s instructions. Please see post #961.
I’ve gone ahead and suspended you for 7 days for multiple warnings in a short period of time. Please take the time to cool off and reflect.
I think this thread has played itself out. I’m closing it.
[/moderating]