Where’s their documentation? Sworn upon a bible under a gold fringed flag?
I claim nothing of the sort,
this tangent has NOTHING to do with the physics of the event(s).
Are you kidding? The first plane’s impact was captured on film, and the second one occurred live on television in front of millions of viewers. Tangents, humor, and pointing out the lack of foundations in your arguments are all you deserve.
again tangents to avoid actually addressing the physics of the event(s)
Probably used the same set that they used to film WWII.
Good luck with that. That’s pre ret-conned Beyonder! :eek:
So how do you know the towers came down.? Maybe they’re still there, cloaked.
That’s the Beyonder of my youth, and any other version is BiNO!
Again, if it were an illusion, then understanding how the illusion was done is germane to the discussion. You can’t just wave your hand and say, “Well, it’s magic.” If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, then there’s a good chance that its quack echoes.
Point, an airliner colliding with a skyscraper wall
would have to suffer the consequences of equal and opposite reaction
and therefore if there was sufficient energy to punch a hole in the wall
that includes having to displace >3 tons of mass, there would be sufficient energy to destroy the airliner and that is break it up into a lot of aircraft wreckage before it had any opportunity to make that wing shaped gash.
do you see this at all?
Okay, let’s talk physics. The vast, vast, VAST majority of experts all over the globe who know science think that the towers were brought down by airplanes. Those who do not are not only few in number, but generally ignored at best. If it really was a matter of high school physics, this would not be the case; the entire scientific community would be pointing this out loudly, constantly, and in unison, as with climate change. But they’re not.
I think I’ll trust them.
Here’s the physics in free verse
Plane hit building!
bad
.
Building caught on fire from jet fuel
Building stayed on fire
People jumped. I saw this as it happened and it was horrific.
The fire heated up the steel which then weakened and the tower collapsed.
Thousands were burned to death or crushed.
This was and is reality.
No illusions necessary.
That’s the physics. And here to make it formal. F=ma.
ah, but at present, we are still at the point where so many people
believe that its not an illusion, its totally legit to have an airliner
penetrate a skyscraper wall “like a hot knife through butter”
BTW: at no time have I said “its magic” there is an explanation, however that part comes later after we get critical mass of people on-board with the concept that its FRAUD.
the famous and all to often miss used F=ma
do you understand that the a in this equation stands for ACCELERATION?
and so what of a building where the collapse event is descending at 64% of the acceleration of gravity?
Well, like I said, duck, meet echo. The reason so many people believe it’s not an illusion is because it actually happened. And you’re the one who keeps using the word “illusion.” Illusion = magic, at least if it’s man-made.
And what’s your obsession with the phrase “hot knife through butter,” anyway? Did you tear your toast spreading cold butter on it?
so you are abdicating your thinking to EXPERTS who have concluded that 19 radical Arabs hijacked airliners … (etc … ) right?
No. That’s not how that works. Yes the plane will be destroyed. But due to conservation of momentum all the pieces are hitting the building as expected. And the plane doesn’t disintegrate the instant the nose touches something.
It wasn’t a wall. For the most part, It was sheets of glass and the metal to hold them in place. Take a look at this photo from this page.
The “hot knife through butter” jj keeps using seems to be a dog whistle.
What do the hijackers have to do with anything? I thought you were talking about physics and science, the general principles of which are widely known and disseminated, not to mentioned examined and studied to death for hundreds of years.
All I was saying was that if “debunking” the official story of the tower collapses were a matter of simple understanding of physics, then every single physicist IN THE WORLD should agree with you right now. But they don’t. I think that’s relevant.