# Who could challenge Obama in the Dem primaries?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-could-challenge-obama-in-the-dem-primaries/586878>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [June 26, 2011, 2:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-could-challenge-obama-in-the-dem-primaries/586878 "2011-06-26T02:28:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Askance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/askance/32/8281_2.png) [@Askance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Askance)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2011, 3:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-could-challenge-obama-in-the-dem-primaries/586878/21 "2011-06-27T03:18:10Z")

</div>

Andrew Cuomo is already being talked about for 2016. If he were to run in 2012 I guess you could call that a credible challenge. But he won’t, of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2011, 5:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-could-challenge-obama-in-the-dem-primaries/586878/22 "2011-06-27T05:57:14Z")

</div>

I think\*\* Dio\*\* underrates the appeal of Rosie O’Donnell in the GOP, or overrates the appeal of Randall Terry in the Democratic Party.

Seriously, once I heard Randall Terry speak about his theory of government, I realized that he’s not just rabidly anti-abortion, he’s also against any government department not covered in a cursory high school survey of antebellum US history.

As for the OP. I think it’s just a thing in US political culture now that we let the sitting President run for a second term pretty much unchallenged in his own party. It’s kind of silly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![suranyi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e36b37/32.png) [@suranyi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/suranyi)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2011, 6:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-could-challenge-obama-in-the-dem-primaries/586878/23 "2011-06-27T06:12:10Z")

</div>

> [@Simplicio](#):
>
> There isn’t really any obvious Ted Kennedy types waiting in the wings. I guess Gore could give it a whirl, but he seems pretty happy in his current incarnation as Global Warming guy. Most of his more creditable 2008 primary challengers are now in his administration (Hillary, Biden) or busy trying to stay out of prison (Edwards).
> 
> I guess Dean could try, he has a strong following amongst the Dem base, was a successful DNC chair and has been somewhat critical of the Obama administration (and was apparently miffed that they didn’t offer him the Sec of HHS position).
> 
> Its pretty hard to picture anyone trying to seriously primary Obama though. If we reach a point where Obama is so unpopular he’s beatable in the primary, then its hard to see the Democrats winning in anycase. And I can’t really see Dean or Gore or anyone wanting to go to the trouble of running a long nasty Primary campaign just to get creamed in the General Election.

This. If somehow a serious opponent develops in the Democratic primary, that means the Republicans will win the election.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2011, 6:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-could-challenge-obama-in-the-dem-primaries/586878/24 "2011-06-27T06:39:09Z")

</div>

That’s it right there. It’s generally counterproductive for the party to primary a sitting POTUS absent some kind of extraordinary circumstance. The challenger (if he cares about his ideology at all) is just cutting off his nose to spite his face. There hasn’t been a serious primary challenge to a sitting POTUS since 1976, when Reagan made it interesting against Ford, but that was in the wake of Watergate. Obama has had no scandals yet. I don’t think he ever will, whether he serves one term or two. Whatever anyone else wants to say about the guy, I think he’s a legitimate straight arrow.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MEBuckner](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mebuckner/32/2896_2.png) [@MEBuckner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MEBuckner)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2011, 8:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-could-challenge-obama-in-the-dem-primaries/586878/25 "2011-06-27T08:29:03Z")

</div>

OK, but what if Randall Terry zaps President Obama by [shooting bolts of lightning](http://www.holysmoke.org/hs00/hatred.htm) [from his fingertips](http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/8/81/BZZZZZZ.jpg)? _Then_ could he win the Democratic primary?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Recovering\_Republican](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/d2c977/32.png) [@Recovering\_Republican](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Recovering_Republican)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2011, 10:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-could-challenge-obama-in-the-dem-primaries/586878/26 "2011-06-27T10:43:39Z")

</div>

> [@Aji\_de\_Gallina](#):
>
> My better-than-passing knowledge of US politics doesn’t help me with this one.
> 
> If Obama were perceived as weak for the 2012 election and his 2nd term seemed in danger, who (non-loony) would rise to the challenge? What Democrat could beat him?
> 
> This assumes that Obama hasn’t raped blind, orphan puppies on national TV or called Kim Jong Il his guiding light.

If the democrats have to replace Obama at this point, they might as well concede the election now.

If you have an incumbant president, you are stuck with him.

Replacing your own guy is a tacit admission that he screwed up and you don’t really know how to run the country.

The ironic thing is that no president really has a fun second term. Bush had Katrina and the Great Recession and Iraq going south. Clinton had Monica. Reagan had Iran-Contra. Nixon had Watergate.

So really, they sign up for more abuse to validate the abuse they’ve already taken.

Maybe we should only have a single six year term.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Recovering\_Republican](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/d2c977/32.png) [@Recovering\_Republican](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Recovering_Republican)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2011, 10:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-could-challenge-obama-in-the-dem-primaries/586878/27 "2011-06-27T10:51:08Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> That’s it right there. It’s generally counterproductive for the party to primary a sitting POTUS absent some kind of extraordinary circumstance. The challenger (if he cares about his ideology at all) is just cutting off his nose to spite his face. There hasn’t been a serious primary challenge to a sitting POTUS since 1976, when Reagan made it interesting against Ford, but that was in the wake of Watergate. Obama has had no scandals yet. I don’t think he ever will, whether he serves one term or two. Whatever anyone else wants to say about the guy, I think he’s a legitimate straight arrow.

I would say that Ted Kennedy’s challenge to Jimmy Carter in 1980 was a pretty serious one. Heck, if the Iranians hadn’t taken hostages, Teddy probably would have unseated Carter.

The interesting thing about caring about idealogy is that the challenge was entirely about idealogy.

In 1976, Ford was a country-club moderate Republican whom the Democrats allowed under the mechanisms of the 25th Amendment. The GOP rank and file didn’t care for him all that much. Reagan represented the conservative wing of the party that had been vying for control since 1964, and found themselves shunted to the back by Eisenhower-Nixon faction.

Same can be said about Ted Kennedy’s challenge of Carter. Liberals in the Democratic Party didn’t like Carter, felt he was too moderate.

Obama probably doesn’t have much to worry about in this regard. Even if the Moonbat left are disappointed he hasn’t cravenly surrendered to the Jihadis and turned us into a socialist paradise, they certainly aren’t going to help the Republicans win. The best thing that Obama has going for him is the Wingnut right will probably pick the GOP nominee.

Of course, if the economy stays in the crapper, even a nutbag like Bachmann can win.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2011, 10:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-could-challenge-obama-in-the-dem-primaries/586878/28 "2011-06-27T10:52:37Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> There hasn’t been a serious primary challenge to a sitting POTUS since 1976, when Reagan made it interesting against Ford

Kennedy vs. Carter in 1980. Both efforts only served to damage the incumbent, as I mentioned already.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JoelUpchurch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f05b48/32.png) [@JoelUpchurch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JoelUpchurch)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2011, 1:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-could-challenge-obama-in-the-dem-primaries/586878/29 "2011-06-27T13:19:44Z")

</div>

> [@Recovering\_Republican](#):
>
> Obama probably doesn’t have much to worry about in this regard. Even if the Moonbat left are disappointed he hasn’t cravenly surrendered to the Jihadis and turned us into a socialist paradise, they certainly aren’t going to help the Republicans win.

Why do anything during the primary when they can run a third party candidate during the general election and do some real damage, like Ralph Nader did in 2000?

Heck, just a credible 3rd party candidate in Florida could swing the election. Florida picked up 2 electoral votes in the last census. We actually have more electoral votes than New York now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gatorslap](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/bb73d2/32.png) [@gatorslap](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gatorslap)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2011, 8:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-could-challenge-obama-in-the-dem-primaries/586878/30 "2011-06-28T20:26:48Z")

</div>

Don’t forget Lyndon LaRouche.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NDP](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ndp/32/55_2.png) [@NDP](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NDP)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2011, 12:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-could-challenge-obama-in-the-dem-primaries/586878/31 "2011-06-29T00:03:46Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> Like I said, no serious challenges. Randall Terry is a certified nutcase.

Randall Terry–now there’s somebody I forgot was still around. You stopped hearing about him around the time he started publicly supporting the people who murdered abortion providers. After that, even the hardcore pro-life zealots didn’t want to have anything to do with him.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-could-challenge-obama-in-the-dem-primaries/586878.md?page=1)
