# Who first put forth the idea that splitting atoms would make a powerful weapon

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-first-put-forth-the-idea-that-splitting-atoms-would-make-a-powerful-weapon/1003367>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [June 26, 2024, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-first-put-forth-the-idea-that-splitting-atoms-would-make-a-powerful-weapon/1003367 "2024-06-26T15:52:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2024, 10:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-first-put-forth-the-idea-that-splitting-atoms-would-make-a-powerful-weapon/1003367/41 "2024-06-27T22:16:01Z")

</div>

> [@Lucas\_Jackson](#):
>
> Surely anyone with the capability has knowledge already.

Has today in 2024? Sure. Had then in 1944 or whatever when the knowledge suppression was in full swing? Not really.

The US was in a mad race to build the bomb and really had little idea which tidbits the enemies had and which they did not. They assumed the enemies were neck and neck with the US when in fact they were a lot behind. I hindsight that made the US haste seem misguided, maybe silly even.

A standard POV in security classification is that you can’t know which pieces of your jigsaw puzzle are unknown to the enemy, nor which are key to them figuring out the big picture, etc. So you protect every piece; both the (seemingly to you) prosaic as well as the profound.

> [@Lucas\_Jackson](#):
>
> Band name!
> 
> ( apologies to [LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy) )

I’m not sure how I got roped into that, but you’re right that would make a great band name. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2024, 10:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-first-put-forth-the-idea-that-splitting-atoms-would-make-a-powerful-weapon/1003367/42 "2024-06-27T22:27:28Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> The FBI visited him and author Cleve Cartmill because his story “Deadline” contained too many accurate descriptions of an atomic weapon (along with some lousy ones that nobody mentions).

In the same vein, Tom Clancy wrote an extremely-detailed depiction of an atomic weapon’s design in his famous chapter “Three Shakes” in _The Sum of All Fears,_ but deliberately inserted some errors into the design to hide how a real nuke works. He says in the afterword in his book something to the effect of, “I distorted the details so that I wouldn’t be liable/culpable in case someone tries to use the info for bad purposes, not like it actually will make a difference.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2024, 10:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-first-put-forth-the-idea-that-splitting-atoms-would-make-a-powerful-weapon/1003367/43 "2024-06-27T22:45:15Z")

</div>

> [@ftg](#):
>
> So people were thinking about energy from the ether. Which doesn’t exist. Oh, well.

No, but it’s sometimes surprising how far you can go with a totally bogus model of the universe as long as you’re careful to match observation and you get the math right. Even now, we can’t _really_ say the ether doesn’t exist, since you can come up with a sophisticated version of it that is consistent with experiment. It’s just not necessary.

Caloric theory is another one that’s wrong, but nevertheless made some good predictions and can be strung along for a surprisingly long time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md-2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9d8465/32.png) [@md-2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md-2000)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2024, 1:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-first-put-forth-the-idea-that-splitting-atoms-would-make-a-powerful-weapon/1003367/44 "2024-06-28T13:03:06Z")

</div>

I believe it was Heinlein’s “Solution Unsatisfactory” which described a dirty bomb, and incidentally predicted the Cold War standoff. It doesn’t take much to build a dirty bomb if you have the radioactive materials.

In 1941.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md-2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9d8465/32.png) [@md-2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md-2000)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2024, 1:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-first-put-forth-the-idea-that-splitting-atoms-would-make-a-powerful-weapon/1003367/45 "2024-06-28T13:05:21Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> The FBI visited him and author Cleve Cartmill because his story “Deadline” contained too many accurate descriptions of an atomic weapon (along with some lousy ones that nobody mentions). Campbell had fed him the physics and told him to go off and write a story. He set it on an alien planet with the Sixa against the good-guy Seilla. Read 'em backwards. Not real hidden subversion there.

I wonder if Campbell as clever as he was put two and two together when the FBI came calling? I don’t recall reading about his reaction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2024, 3:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-first-put-forth-the-idea-that-splitting-atoms-would-make-a-powerful-weapon/1003367/46 "2024-06-28T15:19:56Z")

</div>

H,G, Wells’ _The World Set Free_ acknowledged his inspiration in Frederick Soddy’s book _The Interpretation of Radium_. Soddy (1877-1956) is a largely forgotten British physicist and radiochemist who saw the power and heat released by transmutation of elements through radioactive decay, and thought it would be a good power source and weapon, even if he didn’t have the idea of a Chain Reaction. I suspect we have his popularization of the possibilities inherent in radioactive elements, especially radium, for all the appearances of “radium bullets” and radium-powered lights in a lot of pulp fiction of the early 20th century.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pardel-Lux](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pardel-lux/32/20182_2.png) [@Pardel-Lux](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pardel-Lux)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2024, 10:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-first-put-forth-the-idea-that-splitting-atoms-would-make-a-powerful-weapon/1003367/47 "2024-07-09T10:40:28Z")

</div>

> [@Lucas\_Jackson](#):
>
> I read her Wiki entry. Fascinating. The Nuremberg Laws were disgustingly ugly.

You might be interested in this then:

> **[Lauding Lise Meitner, Who Said ‘No’ to the Atomic Bomb](https://undark.org/2023/08/24/lauding-lise-meitner-who-said-no-to-the-atomic-bomb/)**
>
> Opinion | The movie 'Oppenheimer' makes no mention of the co-discoverer of nuclear fission. But she would have wanted it that way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lucas\_Jackson](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lucas_jackson/32/303_2.png) [@Lucas\_Jackson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lucas_Jackson)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2024, 3:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-first-put-forth-the-idea-that-splitting-atoms-would-make-a-powerful-weapon/1003367/48 "2024-07-09T15:35:14Z")

</div>

Thank you.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-first-put-forth-the-idea-that-splitting-atoms-would-make-a-powerful-weapon/1003367.md?page=2)
