As touched on in the other thread, I’ve been getting Games Magazine off and on for 20 years now, but only really made an effort into the cryptics in the latter 10 years. Before that, it was less of a crossword puzzle and more of a ‘wtf?’, but that was more my own ignorance. Now I regret that I do not have the old issues so I can go back and solve them.
I’ll be 38 in less than two weeks.
Oh, and they still publish World of Puzzles? I never subscribed, but I would pick up the occasional issue. I WILL subscribe if that is the case.
Not that it has ever come up in conversation, but I always play through in my head how to explain cryptics should anyone ask (yes, this is kind of sad actually). When I have this imaginary conversation, I try to come up with a sample clue. As I was doing this yesterday, I had the following:
4 letters - Lump found inside the apple.
heap
So how does one get into the lucrative business of puzzle creation (any puzzle) anyway?
I myself would replace ‘device’ with ‘publication’. ‘Broadcast’ would be preferred, but not in this case for somewhat obvious reasons. When I think of device, I think the delivery tool, not the medium.
Yeah, sorry, “device” wasn’t the word. And “broadcast” would be out because of the overlap of the suffix. As I said, I don’t know exactly where she ended up with the clue, and the question is moot at this point – I just wanted to get an idea of what the age range of solvers might be.
Sounds like the young 'uns are mid-30s – so the solver pool skews somewhat older on cryptics than on most other types of puzzles.
I just tried today’s SMH puzzle (dated October 18) and it seems exactly like British puzzles to me. Although I’m not sure what twickster means by “mixed”. Puzzles here are either pure cryptic or straight.
Maybe not mixed – maybe you just have looser parameters on cryptic-ness. Whatever, I can’t figure out when the clue is supposed to be functioning the way(s) I expect a cryptic clue to operate, and when it isn’t.