Don’t know who’s doing the Churchill programme, but I agree it makes a big difference to the way the subjects may be perceived. I watched the Brunel doc in spite of Clarkson, not because of him, yet in fairness he did a top job. Cromwell is a prickly subject anyway, but Richard Holmes is a pretty stiff bloke and any programme he presents makes him sound like an Edwardian schoolboy tipping out his box of lead soldiers. Lucy Moore is pretty good eye candy, but she seems to know her stuff too.
Elizabeth I is getting Michael Portillo, god help her.
She was very popular around the time she went to the NI office, but has been out of the public eye for a while. Maybe she’ll have a leavening influence to reduce the suspicion of Churchill being vengeful or jingoistic?
BTW, can anybody else make sense of this:
Apart from casting a one-off vote, viewers can rate the candidates according to various “greatness criteria” after each broadcast. The results bear no relation to their position in the list:
(others not “done” yet). It seems that the people who voted for Diana were either too lazy to add a rating, or voted for her as the greatest in spite of her having no claims on greatness.
Everton, that list is only for the web-page votes. So all those who voted for “anyone BUT Diana” will have given Diana a low score after voting, I would guess. Those catagories don’t appear on the phone poll.
There will still be a lot more voters against Diana in total, than for her, IMHO.
Yes, the “five criteria” thing is entirely separate from the main vote - you’re asked to rate whoever’s just been “done” on the box, regardless of where your actual vote went.
Private Eye gave Clarkson a thorough slagging, but his presentation seems to have resonated with people somehow… it’s quite possible Mo Mowlem could do the same for Churchill; from what I’ve seen of her, she’s a pretty good natural communicator. (Like Clarkson, really; his deliberate blokishness may be grating, but there’s no denying his ability to get passionate about an issue and make that passion come across to an audience.)
Mo Mowlem? :eek: Mel Smith in drag? :eek: :eek:
That’s Churchill doomed, then. His attitudes are the antithesis of New Labour, New BBC, so it looks like deliberate sabotage. At least to this old cynic, it does.
Anybody see the Shakespeare episode. I missed it and forgot to set the video. From what I’ve read on the BBC board it doesn’t seem to have made a very good impression.
Current standing are:
1 Brunel
2 Diana
3 Churchill
4 Darwin
5 Shakespeare
6 Nelson
7 Cromwell
8 Newton
9 Elizabeth I
10 Lennon
I did see the Shakespeare programme and am not surprised it didn’t win many converts. I may be influenced by the showing of Diana, but I suspect that too many of the voters are too stupid to appreciate why Will should deserve their vote. They probably struggled with him at school and have never recovered. Worse still the programme emphasised his “grasp of all our humanity” etc., which must have left a few people scratching their heads.
People are either looking for celebrities or for people who achieved something tangible such as freedom from Nazis or ships ‘n’ bridges etc. That’s why Darwin and Newton have got no chance, but although I’m still gratified to see Brunel doing so well I think Churchill’s got it in the bag. Which would be a much better result than you know who.
Anyway, enough of that nonsense - who is the best Lord? …of the Rings, …of the Dance or …of the Flies?
Great to have Old Alan back, isn’t it? * <<<draws chalk penis on Evertons back…hehehe>>>*
Did anyone see the Clarkson report in the Times on Sunday? He berated Darwin the Naturalist for the reason more great works of engineering are not built, as environmentalists all try to stop them 'cause of a rare beetle or slug etc…
He was trying to argue its Darwins fault Brunel is not God, or something. Think he has lost it.
And please, for the sake of all that’s good about Britain, please don’t let Diana win! Nice enough lady, in her way, I suppose, but one of the ten greatest Britons of all time?
If she wins I’ll be looking for somewhere abroad that I can live. Anyone have an outhouse going spare?!