# Who Is the Next Ebert?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [April 6, 2013, 1:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971 "2013-04-06T01:57:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [June 6, 2013, 4:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971/41 "2013-06-06T04:22:39Z")

</div>

> [@Onomatopoeia](#):
>
> With multiple trailers for just about every movie, and reviews and critiques all over the web at almost the instant a movies’ first showing concludes, and sometimes before, there simply isn’t much of a need to wait 2, 3, and sometimes up to 5 days after a movie opens for someone to tell you whether it’s good or not.

I have never read Roger Ebert to find out “whether it’s good or not.” I always read reviews _after_ watching the movie.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ftg](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ftg/32/2801_2.png) [@ftg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ftg)\
**Post date:** [June 6, 2013, 1:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971/42 "2013-06-06T13:49:34Z")

</div>

> [@Siam\_Sam](#):
>
> Well, I think we can write off [Roger Ebert’s website](http://www.rogerebert.com/). The new editor is some clown named Matt Zoller Seitz, who has given _After Earth_ 3-1/2 out of four stars.

I had his website still bookmarked and checked in on it from time to time. But when I saw this, bye-bye bookmark.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [June 6, 2013, 3:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971/43 "2013-06-06T15:10:21Z")

</div>

I often disagreed with Ebert’s star ratings. That didn’t stop me from reading.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Siam\_Sam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d78d45/32.png) [@Siam\_Sam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Siam_Sam)\
**Post date:** [June 6, 2013, 3:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971/44 "2013-06-06T15:18:38Z")

</div>

I rarely disagreed with Ebert’s star ratings. We had very similar tastes. But it was his writing that really did it for me. If some Bozo is going to take over the helm and give a reported stinker like _After Earth_ 3-1/2 stars, well, that’s all I need to know. Noting else to see there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [June 6, 2013, 3:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971/45 "2013-06-06T15:20:06Z")

</div>

> [@Siam\_Sam](#):
>
> I rarely disagreed with Ebert’s star ratings. We had very similar tastes. But it was his writing that really did it for me. If some Bozo is going to take over the helm and give a reported stinker like _After Earth_ 3-1/2 stars, well, that’s all I need to know. Noting else to see there.

Wait, it’s a “reported” stinker? So you don’t actually know if you disagree?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Siam\_Sam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d78d45/32.png) [@Siam\_Sam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Siam_Sam)\
**Post date:** [June 6, 2013, 3:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971/46 "2013-06-06T15:22:35Z")

</div>

I’ve read enough about it that I’m not going to waste my time with it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Intergalactic\_Gladiator](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/intergalactic_gladiator/32/112_2.png) [@Intergalactic\_Gladiator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Intergalactic_Gladiator)\
**Post date:** [June 6, 2013, 4:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971/47 "2013-06-06T16:24:50Z")

</div>

I like how in the comments section, Matt Zoller Seitz replied to someone complaining about his review with “Maybe we saw 2 different movies.” You know, because we all experience things differently. I may go back to that site just to see if his next review is just as laughable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tullsterx](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e9bcb4/32.png) [@tullsterx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tullsterx)\
**Post date:** [June 6, 2013, 5:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971/48 "2013-06-06T17:01:21Z")

</div>

[James Berardinelli](http://www.reelviews.net/movies.php)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Siam\_Sam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d78d45/32.png) [@Siam\_Sam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Siam_Sam)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2013, 12:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971/49 "2013-06-07T00:50:31Z")

</div>

> [@Mavic\_Chen](#):
>
> I was going to say the same thing, good call. I also like the way [James Berardinelli](http://www.reelviews.net/movies.php) writes, his reviews are pretty accurate IMHO and he seems to know how a good film should be put together.

> [@tullsterx](#):
>
> [James Berardinelli](http://www.reelviews.net/movies.php)

Thanks. He looks interesting. I believe I’ve heard the name before.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mahaloth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mahaloth/32/1079_2.png) [@Mahaloth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mahaloth)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2013, 12:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971/50 "2013-06-07T00:57:12Z")

</div>

> [@Siam\_Sam](#):
>
> Well, I think we can write off [Roger Ebert’s website](http://www.rogerebert.com/). The new editor is some clown named Matt Zoller Seitz, who has given _After Earth_ 3-1/2 out of four stars.

I haven’t seen the movie, but Ebert sometimes liked movies that received poor reviews. He called Knowing one of the best science fiction movies of all time(it was 34% on RT) and thought Awake was a great thriller(24% on RT).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Siam\_Sam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d78d45/32.png) [@Siam\_Sam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Siam_Sam)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2013, 1:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971/51 "2013-06-07T01:18:42Z")

</div>

> [@Mahaloth](#):
>
> I haven’t seen the movie, but Ebert sometimes liked movies that received poor reviews. He called Knowing one of the best science fiction movies of all time(it was 34% on RT) and thought Awake was a great thriller(24% on RT).

Yes, and the wife and I agreed with Ebert on those. We all had similar taste. That’s part of the trick, to find someone whose opinion you can trust for yourself. The new editor of his website seems to have poor taste.

It’s really very scary how close our views were. For example, I love the Coen Brothers. The wife may be the only Thai Coen Brothers fan. The one film of theirs she’d never seen was _Raising Arizona_. I saw it when it came out and liked it. It was the only one Ebert hated, but he said he was told at least once a week that he was wrong about that. From what I remembered, I thought he was wrong too. A year or two ago, I finally got the DVD and showed it to the wife and was embarrassed at how juvenile it seemed. The wife wondered why I wanted her to see that. He was right once again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DaveRaver](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/daveraver/32/1078_2.png) [@DaveRaver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DaveRaver)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2013, 1:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971/52 "2013-06-07T01:22:07Z")

</div>

My guess is that The Movie Rat [http://themovierat.com/](http://themovierat.com/) will pick up where Roger Ebert left off.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2013, 3:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971/53 "2013-06-08T15:07:29Z")

</div>

What’s this about there being on professional movie reviewers anymore? There are more out there than ever, now that the Internet created the whole indie reviewer scene.

And that’s why I think Ebert will never be replaced. No one has his clout. It’s like how the networks will never be as big as they used to be now that we have cable.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-is-the-next-ebert/654971.md?page=2)
