# Who was the First Person Fired for Sexual Harassment?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [October 26, 2018, 10:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536 "2018-10-26T10:06:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ccd318/32.png) [@Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Paul_in_Qatar)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2018, 10:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/1 "2018-10-26T10:06:56Z")

</div>

I suppose the case could be made for someone in some royal court getting the ax for looking the wrong way at a princess.

But in the modern epoch, when did companies start firing people for sexual harassment? When did such behavior become actionable, possibly exposing an employer to penalties?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iamthewalrus\_3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/258eb7/32.png) [@iamthewalrus\_3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iamthewalrus_3)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2018, 5:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/2 "2018-10-26T17:30:16Z")

</div>

The [Wikipedia page on Sexual Harassment](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_harassment) lists a few early cases.

[Williams v. Saxbe](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/413/654/1660985/) is the first one chronologically listed. That seems to be about a male supervisor firing a female underling for refusing his sexual advances, so pretty textbook sexual harassment employment discrimination.

Looks like Williams (the woman) won damages, but there’s no indication in the court decision that the harasser faced termination for his behavior.

I expect that some people were fired for actions like this prior to modern law terming it “sexual harassment”, but the firing probably went along traditional power lines.

Like, probably no executive was fired for grabbing the secretaries, but I bet some junior somebody-or-other got fired for treating the boss’s daughter in an unladylike fashion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Reindeer\_Flotilla](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/reindeer_flotilla/32/3024_2.png) [@Reindeer\_Flotilla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Reindeer_Flotilla)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2018, 8:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/3 "2018-10-26T20:35:19Z")

</div>

> [@iamthewalrus\_3](#):
>
> I expect that some people were fired for actions like this prior to modern law terming it “sexual harassment”, but the firing probably went along traditional power lines.

Agreed, and this probably has happened throughout the past few millennia.

> [@](#):
>
> [Williams v. Saxbe](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/413/654/1660985/) is the first one chronologically listed. That seems to be about a male supervisor firing a female underling for refusing his sexual advances, so pretty textbook sexual harassment employment discrimination.
> 
> Looks like Williams (the woman) won damages, but there’s no indication in the court decision that the harasser faced termination for his behavior.

“Burt Saxbe? Tell him he’s fired!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hajario](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hajario/32/171_2.png) [@hajario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hajario)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2018, 8:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/4 "2018-10-26T20:40:45Z")

</div>

> [@Reindeer\_Flotilla](#):
>
> Agreed, and this probably has happened throughout the past few millennia.
> 
> “Burt Saxbe? Tell him he’s fired!”

Right at the very top of the link it says William Saxbe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iamthewalrus\_3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/258eb7/32.png) [@iamthewalrus\_3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iamthewalrus_3)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2018, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/5 "2018-10-26T21:16:10Z")

</div>

> [@hajario](#):
>
> Right at the very top of the link it says William Saxbe.

Also, lest we malign Saxbe further than necessary, he was the first named defendant, but not the one who harassed Williams.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bardos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bardos/32/1069_2.png) [@bardos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bardos)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2018, 10:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/6 "2018-10-26T22:06:35Z")

</div>

i think it was Adam…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![griffin1977](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@griffin1977](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/griffin1977)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2018, 10:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/7 "2018-10-26T22:17:52Z")

</div>

> [@iamthewalrus\_3](#):
>
> Also, lest we malign Saxbe further than necessary, he was the first named defendant, but not the one who harassed Williams.

The accusations were made against a Mr. Harvey Brinson.

> [@](#):
>
> Plaintiff’s discrimination complaint alleged, in essence, that she had had a good working relationship with Mr. Brinson up until she refused a sexual advance made by Mr. Brinson in June. She asserted that thereafter Mr. Brinson engaged in a continuing pattern and practice of harassment and humiliation of her, including but not limited to, unwarranted reprimands, refusal to inform her of matters for the performance \*656 of her responsibilities, refusal to consider her proposals and recommendations, and refusal to recognize her as a competent professional in her field. On the other hand, the alleged basis for terminating plaintiff was her poor work performance during this same period.

More details in this W[aPo article](https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/10/24/proving-sexual-harassment-is-a-struggle/2b6eb091-f975-4844-901f-98f8b5237565/?utm_term=.a89325cda4e7). He was not in fact fired (as on 1979):

> [@](#):
>
> Brinson, who remains in his GS 15 postion as a public information officer at Justice, said in a telephone interview, “If anyone made sexual advances, it was Diane. We had an affair, during which she tried to get me to give her a promotion. I broke it off because I couldn’t afford the motel bills.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![griffin1977](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@griffin1977](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/griffin1977)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2018, 10:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/8 "2018-10-26T22:19:49Z")

</div>

> [@Paul\_in\_Qatar](#):
>
> I suppose the case could be made for someone in some royal court getting the ax for looking the wrong way at a princess.
> 
> But in the modern epoch, when did companies start firing people for sexual harassment? When did such behavior become actionable, possibly exposing an employer to penalties?

I would guess however that the first person fired was NOT connected to a high profile lawsuit like the one mentioned above. I imagine they were quietly let go to avoid bad PR (as in the recent Google cases)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nearwildheaven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/90db22/32.png) [@nearwildheaven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/nearwildheaven)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2018, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/9 "2018-10-26T22:47:50Z")

</div>

> [@griffin1977](#):
>
> I would guess however that the first person fired was NOT connected to a high profile lawsuit like the one mentioned above. I imagine they were quietly let go to avoid bad PR (as in the recent Google cases)

Or, in the case of employees of equal ranking (for instance, a group of factory workers), quite possibly the safety of other employees.

Just because sexual harassment wasn’t talked about in, say, the 1930s doesn’t mean everyone thought it was OK.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![am77494](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/d2c977/32.png) [@am77494](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/am77494)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2018, 2:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/10 "2018-10-27T02:08:25Z")

</div>

> [@Paul\_in\_Qatar](#):
>
> But in the modern epoch, when did companies start firing people for sexual harassment? When did such behavior become actionable, possibly exposing an employer to penalties?

There’s the documented case from 1636 from the East India Company :  
[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00253359.2017.1376480](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00253359.2017.1376480)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2018, 2:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/11 "2018-10-27T02:22:26Z")

</div>

nm, just realized GQ, will comment elsewhere

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Reindeer\_Flotilla](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/reindeer_flotilla/32/3024_2.png) [@Reindeer\_Flotilla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Reindeer_Flotilla)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2018, 2:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/12 "2018-10-27T02:50:01Z")

</div>

Saxbe’s middle initial is ‘B’, and the classic I referenced had nothing to do the case. I even put in quotes to help clue everyone in!

…and I was so proud of the reference. \<sob\>

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![clairobscur](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/839c29/32.png) [@clairobscur](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/clairobscur)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2018, 4:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/13 "2018-10-27T04:40:58Z")

</div>

> [@iamthewalrus\_3](#):
>
> I expect that some people were fired for actions like this prior to modern law terming it “sexual harassment”, but the firing probably went along traditional power lines.
> 
> Like, probably no executive was fired for grabbing the secretaries, but I bet some junior somebody-or-other got fired for treating the boss’s daughter in an unladylike fashion.

That’s a big assumption you’re making, thinking that nobody would have been fired before modern times over such an issue. Even if it wasn’t taken as seriously as it is now, it’s not like grabbing a woman in the workplace was considered a perfectly fine thing to do. I don’t have any link, but I read about strikes over this very issue as early as the 19th century. Or about a foreman being fired for harassing factory workers, along with the plant manager for not doing anything about it (both in France, but I’ve no reason to assume it would have been different elsewhere). People in past times had moral principles too, sometimes very rigid, even. Think of a 19th century wealthy man and factory owner, very respectable by the standards of the time. Do you think that he would necessarily take kindly that his underlings would allow themselves to grab respectable women he employs? I grant you that complaining about it might have been risky or pointless in many cases, but assuming that _no boss_ would have faced serious consequences for such behavior before the last 30 years or so is an extraordinary claim and definitely shouldn’t be assumed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TSBG](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/77aa72/32.png) [@TSBG](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TSBG)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2018, 7:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/14 "2018-10-27T07:57:04Z")

</div>

Given the extraordinarily light treatment of harassers and even rapists in the present day, I have no idea how we can be confident that stern treatment of sexual misconduct was anything like the norm in days past. I suggest that the reason we know about men punished for this behavior is because it was so extraordinary, not because women’s rights were so protected.

I note that the country of France, **clairobcur** ’s supposed cradle of equal rights, is happy to celebrate Roman Polanski–a fugitive from justice who pled guilty to raping a minor.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![griffin1977](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@griffin1977](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/griffin1977)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2018, 3:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/15 "2018-10-27T15:36:00Z")

</div>

> [@clairobscur](#):
>
> That’s a big assumption you’re making, thinking that nobody would have been fired before modern times over such an issue. Even if it wasn’t taken as seriously as it is now, it’s not like grabbing a woman in the workplace was considered a perfectly fine thing to do. I don’t have any link, but I read about strikes over this very issue as early as the 19th century. Or about a foreman being fired for harassing factory workers, along with the plant manager for not doing anything about it (both in France, but I’ve no reason to assume it would have been different elsewhere). People in past times had moral principles too, sometimes very rigid, even. Think of a 19th century wealthy man and factory owner, very respectable by the standards of the time. Do you think that he would necessarily take kindly that his underlings would allow themselves to grab respectable women he employs? I grant you that complaining about it might have been risky or pointless in many cases, but assuming that _no boss_ would have faced serious consequences for such behavior before the last 30 years or so is an extraordinary claim and definitely shouldn’t be assumed.

The key difference would be that in the past, it would be just as likely the blame the woman as the man. That would especially true if (as **iamthewalrus** points out) the power structure was in favour of the man (if the boss’s daughter gets harassed by a peon on the factory floor, then she was the victim, if the boss harassed a secretary, he was the victim being enticed by a loose woman).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ccd318/32.png) [@Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Paul_in_Qatar)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2018, 3:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/16 "2018-10-27T15:43:11Z")

</div>

Thank you all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kent\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kent_clark/32/105_2.png) [@Kent\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kent_Clark)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2018, 10:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/17 "2018-10-27T22:32:30Z")

</div>

In 1969 we had a male faculty member caught making out with a female student. He was fired on the spot. Quite the scandal. Does that count?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2018, 2:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/18 "2018-10-29T02:42:49Z")

</div>

> [@Reindeer\_Flotilla](#):
>
> Saxbe’s middle initial is ‘B’, and the classic I referenced had nothing to do the case. I even put in quotes to help clue everyone in!
> 
> …and I was so proud of the reference. \<sob\>

_I_ got it. Sorry it took so long for me to get to this thread. That was worth at least a \<snerk\>.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/73ab20/32.png) [@md2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md2000)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2018, 4:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/19 "2018-10-29T04:38:24Z")

</div>

> [@bardos](#):
>
> i think it was Adam…

I guess that pre-dates my guess, Caligula.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![clairobscur](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/839c29/32.png) [@clairobscur](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/clairobscur)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2018, 6:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536/20 "2018-10-29T06:14:15Z")

</div>

> [@TSBG](#):
>
> Given the extraordinarily light treatment of harassers and even rapists in the present day, I have no idea how we can be confident that stern treatment of sexual misconduct was anything like the norm in days past. I suggest that the reason we know about men punished for this behavior is because it was so extraordinary, not because women’s rights were so protected.

There’s a difference between “not the norm” and “would never happen unless it’s a lowly employee harassing the boss’ daughter”. I find the later statement an extraordinary claim and some people in this thread seem to think that before 1990 or so it was prehistoric times during which everybody thought that grabbing a woman ass was a perfectly normal action and nobody would have ever faced any consequence for doing so. Once again, try to picture in your mind a person deeming itself respectable in 1950,1900,1850 and wonder what this person would have thought of ass-grabbers.

Answering to the query by “I’m sure nothing ever happened to those people in the past” isn’t a factual answer, it’s a guess, and on top of it an unbelievable guess in my opinion.

> [@](#):
>
> I note that the country of France, **clairobcur** ’s supposed cradle of equal rights, is happy to celebrate Roman Polanski–a fugitive from justice who pled guilty to raping a minor.

I’m not sure how a cheap shot at France is supposed to have anything to do with the issue at hand. Maybe you intended to offend me or something? I mentioned France for the obvious reason that being French I tend to read more about France than about, say, Bangladesh, and as result what I read on this topic happened in France and not in Bangladesh.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-was-the-first-person-fired-for-sexual-harassment/823536.md?page=2)
