I give you
John Churchill 1st Duke of Marlborough.
This account of the Battle of Blenheim show how he drew his French opponents into committing more of their reserves into a less important part of the battlefield, and this gave him the edge in the main confict zone where it mattered most.
http://www.hfac.uh.edu/gbrown/philosophers/leibniz/BritannicaPages/BlenheimBattle/BlenheimBattle.html
http://www.hfac.uh.edu/gbrown/philosophers/leibniz/BritannicaPages/RamilliesBattle/RamilliesBattle.html
http://www.hfac.uh.edu/gbrown/philosophers/leibniz/BritannicaPages/OudenaardeBattle/OudenaardeBattle.html
French casualties outnumbered allied by 3 to 1 according to some reports.
As for Arthur Wellsley, The Duke of Wellington.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/state/monarchs_leaders/wellington_01.shtml
He took on Napoleons’ army many times and never lost, he was responsible for defeating the French in Portugal and had it not been for British politics would have certainly cleared Spain completely.
During his campaign in Spain and Portugal he was outnumbered virtually every time, and although he was forced to retreat on occasion, he was never defeated, nor did he lose so much as a single cannon and in the whole series of engagements was completely successful.
They say a good general thinks about tactic and strategy, but a great one thinks about logistics, and this was definately true of Wellington, and was one of the greatest differances between him and Napoleon.
Wellington drew the French onto fortifications that had been prepared in secret, and considering the scale of them, that was one heck of an achievment.
He used a scorched earth policy to deny material support to the invading French who thought their advance was a sign of success, yet this strategy, using the French own mindset against them, is what led directly to their defeat.
His use of the reverse slope, concealment of his strength from the enemy, the way he chose his ground made his defensive offenses the precurser of WWI strategy.
http://www.napoleonguide.com/battle_bussaco.htm
It was no accident that Waterloo was chosen by Wellington, the ground when badly drained is very deceptive, Napoleon was faced with lugging his heavy cannon across ground that was completely unsuitable and uphill.
By forcing Napoleon to fight in such a place shows how Wellington had dictated the battle order to Napoleon.
The result is the now famous delay that allowed the Prussian army to regroup and enter the fray at a crucial time.
Early on in his military career Wellington had made terrible mistakes, such as the criticality of supplies, but he learned, Napoleon never did, in fact his generalship declined, he overreached himself, he won famous battles but lost all the wars.
Look at the odds Wellington faced here
http://www.napoleonguide.com/battle_assaye.htm