His tats make me question his judgement.
Acquired while drunk, maybe?
On a day that ended in “Y”.
So, 24/7?
When it was 5:00 somewhere.
I doubt anyone in the admin will criticize her for being overly confrontational and nasty. To the contrary, I imagine she is lauded for those very characteristics.
But I periodically wonder how challenging it would be to do that job day in and day out - especially for a President such as Trump. Some people have the ability to simply lie in their/their client’s best interest with a straight face. To do so on-and-on either requires some serious compartmentalization by that person, suggests a profound disdain for one’s audience/the truth, or would be quite fatiguing over time.
Looks like National Security Adviser Mike Waltz will be the first to go. He lasted approximately 9.2 Scaramuccis.
Waltz has been on shaky ground and lost most of his influence in the West Wing after he inadvertently added a reporter to a group chat about military strikes. Trump stood by him at the time, but Waltz’s standing never really recovered, according to four sources. He had also lost clout with top aides inside the West Wing.
Yeah, how dare that guy reveal that we’re using an insecure app, which violates the law by autodeleting communications, to discuss military strikes!
One down 50 or 60 to go! Hopefully this movement gets the gets the temperature of a House on fire! ….The White House that is!
C.Thurston Bessent III. I just wanted to type that 
He’s not Lovey, I can tell you that.
A Democratic Representative, Mark Pocan, did a masterful job of holding Bessent’s feet to the fire (five minute video–the back-and-forth starts about 1:42):
“Do you remember the question?”, after he asks it about ten times 
He (Bessent) is no Alexander Hamilton, that’s for damn sure. A. Ham is probably rolling in his grave.