# Who will win the British election?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [May 4, 2005, 3:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380 "2005-05-04T15:51:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 7:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/41 "2005-05-05T19:49:46Z")

</div>

> [@Avenger](#):
>
> I’m seeing American message boards reporting that Rush Limburgh has run a story reporting ‘early exit polls’ showing low turnout and the Tories heading for victory.  
> …What’s he on about Yanks?

That would be “What’s he _on_?” Quite a variety (and quantity) of prescription painkillers.

The guy’s an entertainer whose schtick is political commentary, not an actual news source.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Avenger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9de0a6/32.png) [@Avenger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Avenger)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 7:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/42 "2005-05-05T19:50:27Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> 😕 That the same thing as the bookies?

Pretty much, I assume **Dead Badger** was refering to spreadbetters. Sporting Index are showing a spread of 87-94 seats on the Labour majority as of right now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 7:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/43 "2005-05-05T19:58:13Z")

</div>

> [@Avenger](#):
>
> . . . until after 10pm when the polls close.

!!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Avenger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9de0a6/32.png) [@Avenger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Avenger)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 8:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/44 "2005-05-05T20:00:24Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> !!!

It’s 9 now, you have to wait another hour…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/45 "2005-05-05T20:24:32Z")

</div>

> [@Avenger](#):
>
> May I ask where on Earth you see the common ground for that coalition partnership occuring?

A desire for power. A LibDem/Tory coalition seems to be doing pretty ok in Luton.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/46 "2005-05-05T20:34:59Z")

</div>

> [@GorillaMan](#):
>
> The largest party is ‘invited’ to form a government (i.e. invitied by the Queen)

Umm… not exactly. The Monarch invites someone they believe capable of commanding a majority in the House of Commons. Usually this is the leader of the largest party.

For example, should Mr Blair lose his seat, the Queen might well invite Mr Brown to form a government, not John Prescott.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Avenger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9de0a6/32.png) [@Avenger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Avenger)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 8:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/47 "2005-05-05T20:38:33Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> A desire for power. A LibDem/Tory coalition seems to be doing pretty ok in Luton.

Somewhat of a difference when we’re talking about national issues though IMO.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 8:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/48 "2005-05-05T20:38:44Z")

</div>

Hmmm…would that really be likely to happen, or is it a theoretical ‘would be possible’? I’d have thought that whoever the Labour Party (officially) recognised as their leader in the Commons would be invited? Anything else would mean the Queen was meddling with politics?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sinical\_brit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/48db29/32.png) [@sinical\_brit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sinical_brit)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 8:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/49 "2005-05-05T20:41:27Z")

</div>

I fear this may be my last post - i think my account runs out at midnight today and i havnt renewed yet, but which channel coverage are people going for? I notice bbc2 has David D, ITV has Johnny D, and bbc1 scotland has - well - no-one special. I’m going for bbc2 then ch4 later for Bremner, B & Fortune’s take on the whole affair.

Sin

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Avenger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9de0a6/32.png) [@Avenger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Avenger)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 8:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/50 "2005-05-05T20:43:51Z")

</div>

I flick between BBC and Sky News. Oh and thanks for the heads up, didn’t know about the Bremner, Bird and Fortune thing!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Avenger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9de0a6/32.png) [@Avenger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Avenger)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 8:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/51 "2005-05-05T20:54:08Z")

</div>

BBC exit poll predicts a Labour majority of 66.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![yojimbo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/yojimbo/32/232_2.png) [@yojimbo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/yojimbo)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/52 "2005-05-05T20:55:22Z")

</div>

Not my election but I love the coverage.

I’m going for bbc1 foor 5mins the over to 2 for Dead Ringers, then ch4 for Bremner, Bird and Fortune and finally back to bbc1 for David B, Paxo and Snow with his swingometer.

God I love BBC.

They just forecasted Labour with a 60-70ish majority. Blair’s in trouble if that is true.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![yojimbo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/yojimbo/32/232_2.png) [@yojimbo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/yojimbo)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 8:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/53 "2005-05-05T20:57:52Z")

</div>

Bit drunk. Forgive the terrible typing.

Oh and David **D**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![yojimbo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/yojimbo/32/232_2.png) [@yojimbo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/yojimbo)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 9:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/54 "2005-05-05T21:06:17Z")

</div>

Cya **sinical brit** ☹

Have a good one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mittu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ecd19e/32.png) [@mittu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mittu)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 9:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/55 "2005-05-05T21:09:24Z")

</div>

Looks like Labour are going to win again though with a significantly reduced margain, polls can’t always be trusted though of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Futile\_Gesture](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/f05b48/32.png) [@Futile\_Gesture](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Futile_Gesture)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 9:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/56 "2005-05-05T21:43:12Z")

</div>

I voted tactically in order to, hopefully, ensure a LibDem win over a marginal Labour seat. I expect a Labour reduced-majority overall, but I’m hoping that it looks bleak enough for Labour that Blair will be given the boot after the election.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dead\_Badger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/848f3c/32.png) [@Dead\_Badger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dead_Badger)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/57 "2005-05-05T23:16:02Z")

</div>

> [@GorillaMan](#):
>
> Oh, come on, New Labour _thrives_ on elitism.

Only relative to Old Labour, wherein the very concept of one pupil out-achieving another is anathema. New Labour represents the most tentative forays into competition, attached to fluffy statist language. Elitist they most certainly are not.

> [@](#):
>
> This is the opposite of Labour policy - they’re determined to get rid of the Comprehensive system.

So why did they start by ridding us completely of grammar schools? They’ve declared war on the “bog-standard” comprehensive, but spent their entire first term ensuring that we were equipped with nothing but. In attempting to rid public schools of their charitable status, they go further in effectively removing even those rare avenues the poor have in to top-class education by ensuring that the best schools can not afford even those scholarships that they do offer. Way to go.

> [@](#):
>
> Huh? We had the eleven-plus right up to 1997? 😉 (Getting rid of specific selective anomalies isn’t the same as a complete system being removed)

Shame they removed the entire system, then. The 11-plus is obviously not the only criteria on which selection can be operated, and Labour did their damnedest in their first term to exterminate any trace of selection. Even now its tentative re-introduction is referred to as “prioritising” on the basis of “aptitude”; no reference to such horrid terms as “ability” can be permitted.

> [@](#):
>
> Nobody would claim that the system as it is works well. But what solution to the demand for places at ‘good schools’ would you offer? (And if you want selection, how does the ability of richer parents to get their kids better-prepared for tests not also give an unfair advantage?)

I agree that academic selection is no panacea; my point as stated above is that even a system in which richer parents are forced to prep their kids is better than one in which they can simply move to a better area. A thick rich kid can only be made to appear so clever in a test, no matter how hard they are tutored, whereas even the stupidest scion of a rich family can be moved into a suitable catchment area. You will never be able to stop rich people from gaining an advantage; but what we have at the moment is a system which ensures _only_ people who are rich enough can choose a good school for their children. Better? I think not.

> [@](#):
>
> Both. (I find him to be revoltingly smug.)

Hmm - well I can only urge you to rethink him - I do believe him to be genuine, and even the partisan press has reported his campaign in his local area as amongst the nicest in living memory. I liked the description of him I read a while back as a sort of highly intellectual Winnie the Pooh. What can I say; I like him, he seems fluffy. Try viewing him without the traditional anti-Tory filter. I agree it’s hard, but give it a go. Lest you think me a horrible Tory nut, incidentally, I should point out that I voted Labour today, albeit more on the virtues of the local candidate than for any other reason.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 11:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/58 "2005-05-05T23:23:07Z")

</div>

Where are ITV getting their numbers from? Are they just putting up ‘probable’ Labour wins before they are announced? How long before we get an embarassing retraction…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mittu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ecd19e/32.png) [@mittu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mittu)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 11:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/59 "2005-05-05T23:40:39Z")

</div>

I’m sticking to the BBC’s coverage to avoid the American-style antics of seeing who can declare the winner first only to retract and change it several times. I don’t think many people are in such a great rush to find out who won that they would rather listen to wild speculation than wait for the hard facts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dead\_Badger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/848f3c/32.png) [@Dead\_Badger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dead_Badger)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2005, 11:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380/60 "2005-05-05T23:43:46Z")

</div>

> [@GorillaMan](#):
>
> Where are ITV getting their numbers from? Are they just putting up ‘probable’ Labour wins before they are announced? How long before we get an embarassing retraction…

ITV? What? You’re forgoing Paxo and DimbleDee, Hislop and Johnson, John Snow and the swingometer of DOOOOOOM? Fie, man. For shame, for shame. 😉

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/who-will-win-the-british-election/302380.md?page=4)
