Why am I intimidated by J.K. Rowling? (NOT about the HP books)

Ah, yes, the old middle-of-the-night I’ll-never-be-good-enough fantods. I know them well. Here’s a thought:

1.) Humankind has been telling the story of The Quest and The Young Person Comes of Age since before we had fire, even.
2.) There’s no such thing as the definitive telling of a story.
3.) A lot of mediocre writers have hit the jackpot; a lot of extraordinarily talented stylists are the mania of a tiny (but passionate) audience. Financial success, for a writer, is a crapshoot. What lasts, especially with the writer, is having produced something you yourself are pleased with.
4.) That which is today’s fad may be completely forgotten tomorrow. Like Rafael Sabatini, a perfectly serviceable (not brilliant, serviceable) writer of popular adventure fiction in the early 20th century. Anybody read him now? I mean, other than people who hang out at the library’s used-book sale?
5.) Not being The Best Ever doesn’t mean you’re not good. And book sales are no indicator of whether you’re good; look at the early works of Mary Higgins Clark or Barbara Taylor Bradford.

OK, well, that’s a couple of thoughts. But here’s the deal. You don’t have to touch every heart in the world, and you probably won’t get rich. You will, however, have several experiences that indicate to you, deeply and irrevocably, just what your words have meant to someone whose existence you don’t even begin to suspect. A Lexus is rather a commonplace goal, but not everybody will know what it’s like to hear from a stranger who’s passionately captivated by something they’ve written.

Let us have no more of standards of doubtful relevance–writing because you might become as wealthy as J.K. Rowling is like joining the space program 'cause you might meet Mr. Spock. The real reason to join the space program is so’s you can see the stars close up, isn’t it?

Back to the keyboard, madame, and thrill us some more!

Declan and Wendell:

I was somewhat overwrought when I used that term “worlds”. In fact, I really shouldn’t have used it at all. What I meant was that I was afraid Rowling had set the bar way too high, not with her work itself, but with its net worth. IOW, I was afraid that a publisher would say, “Well, can this bring in anywhere near what the HP books bring in?..No? Well, then why should we bother with it?”

I realize now that it’s not going to be that cut and dried, but that’s how I felt at the time.

As far as “worlds” in the sense of the setting and premise of a novel, I do think I have something worthwhile here. The premise is something that’s rarely explored in YA literature, and then usually in an unrealistic, soap-opera fashion. Mr. Rilch says you should endeavor to tell the reader something they don’t already know. And I am!

Girl-meets-boy, also, which is what I’m doing.

**

True enough!

**

Indeed. Not everyone who’s into SF/fantasy has Zelazny for their favorite, but I do, and meeting him (less than a year before his death :() was a glorious moment for me. I’d like to think that someday, at least one person will be as happy to meet me. And even if they don’t, I still like my stuff.

**

Uh…who? :wink:

**

Right. Again I say, I wasn’t upset because I thought I’d never get rich—although I do think it’s reasonable to want this to at least lift me out of poverty, considering the amount of time I’ve put into it. I was only worried about being published, due to the (unreasonable) fear that publishers wouldn’t be interested in anything that did not have the potential to be a money machine like Rowling’s.

And I don’t want a Lexus; I want a Mustang! :wink:

**

Hey, I wanted to be a writer before I’d even heard of her. I’m not trying to “beat” anyone*.

Back to the keyboard, madame, and thrill us some more! **
[/QUOTE]

I’ll do that!

*Wanted to put this in a separate post.

My very first influence was A.A. Milne. I can pinpoint this because there’s a scribbled note in my copy of Winnie-the-Pooh. The chapter “In Which Piglet is Entirely Surrounded By Water” wraps up with a very long, long, run-on sentence: “and…and…and…”

“And that really is the end of the story,” says the narrator, “and as I am very tired after that last sentence, I think I shall stop there.”

Understanding bloomed in my little four-year-old mind (yes, I did learn to read that early): he created that sentence. The story, the whole book, did not exist until Milne started putting words on paper. And I wanted to do that too. I didn’t understand the concepts of wealth or fame or competition; I just knew I wanted to make my own sentences.

…stupid hamsters…

…oh, there it is…

Rilchiam writes:

> Declan and Wendell:
>
> I was somewhat overwrought when I used that term “worlds”.
> In fact, I really shouldn’t have used it at all. What I meant was
> that I was afraid Rowling had set the bar way too high, not
> with her work itself, but with its net worth.

This discussion has gotten too confused for me. Were you in any way replying to me when you wrote this? I can see how this is a reply to Declan, but I never even mention the term “worlds,” and I don’t understand in what sense what you have written (which I generally agree with) is a reply to what I wrote.

McJohn writes:

> Like Rafael Sabatini, a perfectly serviceable (not brilliant,
> serviceable) writer of popular adventure fiction in the early 20th
> century. Anybody read him now?

A number of Sabatini’s books are in print. At least Captain Blood and Scaramouche have a small cult among the fans of late nineteenth and early twentieth century adventure novels. There are better examples of forgotten writers.

**

Well, he was replying to me when he said what you quoted, and you were talking about the public-schoolboys genre in which HP’s “world” has it origins. I was replying to both of you in that I wanted to make it clear that I wasn’t trying to create a completely new, utterly unheard-of setting for my stories.

(I hope that’s not more confusing.)

Beautiful, Ril, you have summed up the best reason for writing: Writers write because they have to. Any fame and fortune is almost a byproduct, if not a stroke of luck. If your story pleases your audience (be it only your spouse or your kid), it has achieved its purpose. The rest is gravy.

DD