I can’t speak for the other three cities, but one of the main reasons St. Louis is a brick city is because it had actual clay mines and brickworks inside the city limits. Most of the trees were miles away.
If you’re in Hurricane Alley brick holds up better.
A lot of it is fashion. I grew up in the South in the 1960s, when “new brick (veneer) houses” were spoken of the same way as “a brand new Cadillac.” Even though it was a lumbering area, only older houses, in prewar neighborhoods, were wood. For one thing, a wood shack or shotgun house didn’t take great skill to build, but a brick house required** hiring a mason.**
Except that they’re not. Brick houses are more expensive than wood frame houses of similar size, not cheaper.
My parents built their brick house in Wisconsin in the early 80s, and I remember them commenting on the extra expense - it just wasn’t common at all in rural western WI. In Minneapolis, it’s still not terribly common. You’ll more often see stucco houses than you will brick ones. And rarely are they brick on all sides; it’s generally just a facing or so.
Sad, kind of. I prefer brick homes myself (probably because I grew up in one).
It seems to me that a brick veneer house would be at least as well-insulated as one with wood siding. With brick, you typically have 2x4 framing on the exterior wall, with drywall on the inside surface, fiberglass insulation inside the wall, and one inch or so of foam board on its outside surface. Then you have an air gap of an inch or so, then three inches of brick.
Now brick construction is the only kind I’m familiar with - what does the wall of a wood-sided house consist of?
Remove the brick veneer and replace it with sheathing, then some sort of covering like siding or those nasty fake-brick shingles. If you’re on a budget, you can omit the sheathing and beef up your siding.
Pittsburgh is interesting. The south side (or whatever it’s called) is all frame houses, but if you go a couple of miles into the suburbs everything is brick. I’d guess those are mostly post-wWII, though, if just barely.
Really? The mill building I mentioned upthread didn’t have drywall on the inside of the building nevermind insulation, just the other side of the bricks; I’d count them when I was bored. I don’t know that I’ve ever been inside a brick house, though, so maybe brick houses have real walls even here.
coming from teh west coast, brick houses are rare. I’d assume that, historically, it has something to do wtih the cost of bricks (whereas trees were everywhere) and also with their inability to stand up to earthquakes.
I think you’re thinking of old brick buildings–they were built that way once, but now any new brick building is just going to be a veneer over standard stick-built construction (or concrete, whatever). Walls are no longer made entirely of brick, for the most part, so I’m not seeing the insulation thing really being an issue with new construction.
I can see the earthquake thing being an issue, since it would be expensive to repair even minor brick damage, although I don’t believe the midwest is much more earthquake prone (at least WI) than the South.
All of this makes perfect sense.
Mount Vernon, George Washington’s home, is mostly wood but with faux stone exterior walls. See the bottom of this page: http://www.jstor.org/pss/2674286
A closeup pic: http://2passthetorch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/mt-vernon-stone.jpg