In theory, people should have the right to offend without the fear of violence as a consequence.
In theory, I should be able to walk anywhere in the world, at any time – day or night – inebriated, and wearing my jewel-encrusted Rolex on my arm and my $3,400 Nikon DSLR around my neck, without fear that harm or crime might befall me.
In theory, I should be able to produce craven images of another religion’s prophets without fear of violent retribution.
In a very, very, absurdly narrow and academic/theoretical construction, words don’t have intrinsic meanings.
But I don’t live in a book. I live in the real world. And that real world is inhabited by a fair number of billions of people, each of whom is distinct, unique, and nearly infinitely complex – almost without regard to how they first appear when you meet them.
In the real world, things function dramatically differently than how I, or others, might believe they ought to. In the real world, any number of details might paint a scenario which radically alters vast swaths of peoples’ perception of the scenario about which we’re talking.
Which is all in response to what really is a Reductio ad Absurdum argument on your part, so – while cleaning up the typo helped a fair bit – making the question more rational may have been too big an ask of that simple edit.