# Why are incandescent light bulbs illegal?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [November 16, 2014, 3:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750 "2014-11-16T03:58:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dorsiflector](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ac91a4/32.png) [@dorsiflector](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dorsiflector)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 3:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/1 "2014-11-16T03:58:13Z")

</div>

This annoys me to no end. I like incandescent light bulbs; they’re very warm, and make my home feel like, well a home.

- Fluorescent bulbs make my home feel like a parking deck
- LED bulbs require a second mortgage on my home.

wth? Why did the gov’ment take away my incandescent bulbs? What happened to a free market, with supply and demand?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jz78817](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jz78817/32/1028_2.png) [@jz78817](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jz78817)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 4:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/2 "2014-11-16T04:04:11Z")

</div>

> [@dorsiflector](#):
>
> This annoys me to no end. I like incandescent light bulbs; they’re very warm, and make my home feel like, well a home.
> 
> - Fluorescent bulbs make my home feel like a parking deck
> - LED bulbs require a second mortgage on my home.
> 
> wth? Why did the gov’ment take away my incandescent bulbs? What happened to a free market, with supply and demand?

incandescent light bulbs are 2% efficient at doing their intended jobs. they really deserve to be taken out back and shot.

and no, LED bulbs don’t require a second mortgage. they’re a lot more expensive, but they’ll pay for themselves via their drastically lower energy usage and longer life. Just don’t buy the $2 pieces of shit you find in the bargain bin.

and as for why the guv’mit mandated phasing them out, it’s because of the first point I raised. They burn hundreds of watts to produce a couple of watts of light. That’s miserably poor efficiency by any measure. And power generation isn’t free. The power that incandescent light bulbs waste is lost. period.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 4:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/3 "2014-11-16T04:15:16Z")

</div>

> [@dorsiflector](#):
>
> This annoys me to no end. I like incandescent light bulbs; they’re very warm, and make my home feel like, well a home.
> 
> - Fluorescent bulbs make my home feel like a parking deck
> - LED bulbs require a second mortgage on my home.
> 
> wth? Why did the gov’ment take away my incandescent bulbs? What happened to a free market, with supply and demand?

Not what I understand, what I do see is that a lot of the issues are exaggerated by some media:

> **[Bonehead Bulb Bill Backers Boost Boatloads of BS: Media Matters Bites Back](https://thinc.blog/2011/07/21/bonehead-bulb-bill-backers-boost-boatloads-of-bs-media-matters-bites-back/)**
>
> Bottom line: Yes they have mercury – vanishingly small, and getting smaller amount. (see below) The coal burning that your bulb help us avoid will keep more mercury out of the environment tha…

> [@](#):
>
> **No, incandescent bulbs are not banned – the efficiency standard simply says they have to meet a certain performance level, like the mileage standard on your car.**
> 
> And anyway, the whole issue will become moot as high quality LED bulbs, even more efficient than compact fluorescents, with no mercury, drop in price over the next few years.
> 
> Media Matters cuts through:
> 
> The conservative media campaign in support of House GOP efforts to overturn light bulb efficiency standards signed into law by President Bush centers on two primary claims: 1) That we will all be forced to use compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) when the standards take effect and 2) That CFLs are terrible.
> 
> It is simply not the case that consumers will have to use CFLs, contrary to what conservative media outlets claimed in at least 40 instances over the past seven months. Moreover, these media outlets have used false and misleading attacks to demonize CFLs, which can save households more than $57 per bulb, according to Consumer Reports.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dorsiflector](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ac91a4/32.png) [@dorsiflector](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dorsiflector)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 4:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/4 "2014-11-16T04:29:03Z")

</div>

You’ll get no argument from me that LED`s are far more efficient. My argument relates to the following point(s).

> [@jz78817](#):
>
> …and as for why the guv’mit mandated phasing them out, it’s because of the first point I raised. They burn hundreds of watts to produce a couple of watts of light. That’s miserably poor efficiency by any measure. And power generation isn’t free. The power that incandescent light bulbs waste is lost. period.

I am paying my electric bill. If I _choose_ to buy an inefficient bulb, and spend my hard-earned money on incandescent light, then why can’t I?

- Let’s say I buy a Hummer with the biggest engine available, that gets 6MPG. Is the government going to now force me to drive a more fuel efficient vehicle? It’s not the government’s business to regulate the market in this way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 4:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/5 "2014-11-16T04:30:02Z")

</div>

They are not illegal. This link is for page 1 of 4 on an Ace Hardware incandescent light bulb search.

> **[Kitchen Mixers - Food and Baking Mixers at Ace Hardware](https://www.acehardware.com/departments/home-and-decor/small-appliances/food-mixers)**
>
> Shop Mixers at acehardware.com and get Free Store Pickup at your neighborhood Ace. Buy Online & Pickup Today. See Details.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Joker\_and\_the\_Thief](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e79b87/32.png) [@The\_Joker\_and\_the\_Thief](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Joker_and_the_Thief)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 4:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/6 "2014-11-16T04:30:18Z")

</div>

> [@dorsiflector](#):
>
> This annoys me to no end. I like incandescent light bulbs; they’re very warm, and make my home feel like, well a home.
> 
> - Fluorescent bulbs make my home feel like a parking deck
> - LED bulbs require a second mortgage on my home.
> 
> wth? Why did the gov’ment take away my incandescent bulbs? What happened to a free market, with supply and demand?

Because Obama, Greenpeace, and the other Democratic fascists have a compulsive need to control your life. And once they get inside your home, the first thing they’re going to do is…

_wipes away froth_

Incandescent lightbulbs are basically a case of market failure, because people were unable to see that the cost of a lightbulb is almost entirely in electricity and not in the lightbulb itself. There are very few examples where incandescent make economic sense–if you need to install a lightbulb in a place where you can’t retrieve it and are only going to use it for a short time, or if you expect the lightbulb to be broken before it wears out (in a prison, perhaps?), or if someone is so impoverished that there are better things to invest money in than lightbulbs. But on the whole, almost everyone is better off buying more energy efficient lighting.

I don’t particularly like this regulation, and I would rather have it repealed, but it at least clearly accomplishes its purpose, which is making life on average better. There are much bigger fish in the sea than this.

> [@dorsiflector](#):
>
> You’ll get no argument from me that LED`s are far more efficient. My argument relates to the following point(s).
> 
> I am paying my electric bill. If I _choose_ to buy an inefficient bulb, and spend my hard-earned money on incandescent light, then why can’t I?
> 
> - Let’s say I buy a Hummer with the biggest engine available, that gets 6MPG. Is the government going to now force me to drive a more fuel efficient vehicle? It’s not the government’s business to regulate the market in this way.

To answer this directly: our culture has decided that if a large number of people make a decision that is objectively poor for them and results in some negative externalities for the rest of us, that we reserve the right to ban such activity. Think hard drugs for a good analogy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mdcastle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/958977/32.png) [@Mdcastle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mdcastle)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 4:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/7 "2014-11-16T04:33:37Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Joker\_and\_the\_Thief](#):
>
> Because Obama, Greenpeace, and the other Democratic fascists have a compulsive need to control your life. And once they get inside your home, the first thing they’re going to do is…
> 
> _wipes away froth_
> 
> Incandescent lightbulbs are basically a case of market failure, because people were unable to see that the cost of a lightbulb is almost entirely in electricity and not in the lightbulb itself. There are very few examples where incandescent make economic sense–if you need to install a lightbulb in a place where you can’t retrieve it and are only going to use it for a short time, or if you expect the lightbulb to be broken before it wears out (in a prison, perhaps?), or if someone is so impoverished that there are better things to invest money in than lightbulbs. But on the whole, almost everyone is better off buying more energy efficient lighting.
> 
> I don’t particularly like this regulation, and I would rather have it repealed, but it at least clearly accomplishes its purpose, which is making life on average better. There are much bigger fish in the sea than this.

I wouldn’t call it market failure in all cases, I know exactly how much it costs to burn incandescent bulbs compared to LEDs and a choose to burn them. The best quality light is one thing I can afford. Light bulbs are one thing most people can afford to stockpile a lifetime supply of, I may have to do that if halogens are still going to be banned and LEDs still aren’t good enough yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 4:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/8 "2014-11-16T04:35:38Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Joker\_and\_the\_Thief](#):
>
> Because Obama, Greenpeace, and the other Democratic fascists have a compulsive need to control your life. And once they get inside your home, the first thing they’re going to do is…
> 
> _wipes away froth_
> 
> …

I guess you missed the part where this law was passed during the Bush administration.

Froth if you must; it’s always much more entertaining when based on a fantasy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 4:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/9 "2014-11-16T04:36:41Z")

</div>

> [@dorsiflector](#):
>
> - Let’s say I buy a Hummer with the biggest engine available, that gets 6MPG. Is the government going to now force me to drive a more fuel efficient vehicle? It’s not the government’s business to regulate the market in this way.

It can be argued, but in this case the captains of industry are also moving the market.

[https://www.ase.org/resources/factsheet-new-energy-efficiency-standards-light-bulbs](https://www.ase.org/resources/factsheet-new-energy-efficiency-standards-light-bulbs)

> [@](#):
>
> ```
> Sylvania has been hiring people in Pennsylvania, Philips in New York, and GE in Illinois, to make the new incandescent bulbs.
> 
> ```
> 
> **Not Banned, Just Better**
> 
> ```
> Less energy waste: Under the new standards, a bulb as bright as an old 100-watt incandescent bulb will now use no more than 72 watts.
> More choice: Manufacturers have developed new incandescent and LED bulbs that meet the standard.
> Smaller bills: New bulbs will save a typical family $100 a year on household energy bills, and save the United States $10 billion a year.
> New jobs: Lighting companies are hiring people to design and make the new bulbs.
> 
> ```
> 
> **Supported by Lighting Manufacturers**
> 
> Manufacturers strongly support the new lighting standards, which were jointly proposed by manufacturers and efficiency and environmental advocates, and supported by consumer groups and states. The lighting manufacturers’ lead trade association, National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), has fully endorsed the standards.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Joker\_and\_the\_Thief](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e79b87/32.png) [@The\_Joker\_and\_the\_Thief](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Joker_and_the_Thief)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 4:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/10 "2014-11-16T04:42:36Z")

</div>

> [@Mdcastle](#):
>
> I wouldn’t call it market failure in all cases, I know exactly how much it costs to burn incandescent bulbs compared to LEDs and a choose to burn them. The best quality light is one thing I can afford. Light bulbs are one thing most people can afford to stockpile a lifetime supply of, I may have to do that if halogens are still going to be banned and LEDs still aren’t good enough yet.

Then you are the exception, and it is still generally market failure. Most people burn incandescents because they think they are saving money or don’t appreciate the real costs to it.

Also, I’m pretty sure you can get the exact same color temperature with modern LED lights, and LEDs are approaching 100 CRI. There’s only a marginal basis for still using incandescents.

> [@LSLGuy](#):
>
> I guess you missed the part where this law was passed during the Bush administration.
> 
> Froth if you must; it’s always much more entertaining when based on a fantasy.

I was being sarcastic, but I guess I should’ve been a bit more exaggerated. A shame.

The other thing is that incandescents were basically a commodity–identical between manufacturers and produced on extremely low margins. Higher priced lighting has more exclusive features and has more room for profit, which is why manufacturers lobbied for the ban, and why it got passed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 4:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/11 "2014-11-16T04:47:03Z")

</div>

“Energy-saving” incandescent bulbs can be bought off the shelf at Target for a buck apiece.

Incandescent bulbs are not banned. They have never been banned. The government took nothing away.

Now go write that 100 times on the nearest blackboard.

And for Pete’s sake. Stop listening to anyone who tells you different. Now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dorsiflector](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ac91a4/32.png) [@dorsiflector](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dorsiflector)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 4:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/12 "2014-11-16T04:52:11Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> “Energy-saving” incandescent bulbs can be bought off the shelf at Target for a buck apiece.
> 
> Incandescent bulbs are not banned. They have never been banned. The government took nothing away.
> 
> Now go write that 100 times on the nearest blackboard.
> 
> And for Pete’s sake. Stop listening to anyone who tells you different. Now.

> **[Lights out for incandescent bulbs](https://www.nj.com/mercer/2012/02/lights_out_for_incandescent_bu.html)**
>
> That comforting glow from a lamp positioned just over your shoulder as you page through a magazine or work on taxes is fading fast, thanks to new energy-saving measures being implemented by the U.S. government

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![beowulff](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/beowulff/32/542_2.png) [@beowulff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/beowulff)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 4:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/13 "2014-11-16T04:57:23Z")

</div>

> [@dorsiflector](#):
>
> [Lights out for incandescent bulbs - nj.com](http://www.nj.com/mercer/index.ssf/2012/02/lights_out_for_incandescent_bu.html)

From the article:

> [@](#):
>
> Under the law, which has aroused some grumblings of governmental Big Brother tactics, all light bulbs from 40 through 100 watts must be 25 percent more efficient by the beginning of 2014.

Which is why Halogen lamps are still permitted, even though they suck energy, too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrightNShiny](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7bcc69/32.png) [@BrightNShiny](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrightNShiny)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 4:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/14 "2014-11-16T04:59:59Z")

</div>

> [@dorsiflector](#):
>
> You’ll get no argument from me that LED`s are far more efficient. My argument relates to the following point(s).
> 
> I am paying my electric bill. If I _choose_ to buy an inefficient bulb, and spend my hard-earned money on incandescent light, then why can’t I?

Nobody pays the entire cost of electricity generation and distribution. Or to look at it another way, everyone pays for it. Energy generation and distribution is subsidized and cross-subsidized by the tax payer and the electricity consumer in all sorts of ways. Since the rest of us are partially paying for your electricity (and everyone else’s), many of us think the electricity system should be used efficiently.

On top of that, many types of electricity generation release greenhouse gasses. And while there has been a big shift in electricity generation to lower greenhouse-gas technologies, a good chunk of our power generation still releases greenhouse gasses, which is a cost you (and all electricity users) spread to everyone else.

> [@](#):
>
> - Let’s say I buy a Hummer with the biggest engine available, that gets 6MPG. Is the government going to now force me to drive a more fuel efficient vehicle? It’s not the government’s business to regulate the market in this way.

The government already regulates fuel efficiency standards for vehicles. You may not think it’s the government’s business, but fortunately for the rest of us, many people think it is the government’s business.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joey\_P](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/919ad9/32.png) [@Joey\_P](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Joey_P)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 5:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/15 "2014-11-16T05:00:05Z")

</div>

As everyone else said, you can just go to Home Depot and buy regular light bulbs, but if you want CFLs that don’t feel like a parking garage, just look at the back of the package and buy ones with a warmer color temperature.

Most every light bulb has some sort of chart on the back [like this](http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/th/aplus/envirobulb/envirobulb-B00DPUO6XO-a19-lightcolor-sm.jpg) that indicates what color the light is, buy one towards the red end of the spectrum and you really won’t be able to tell it isn’t incandescent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Joker\_and\_the\_Thief](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e79b87/32.png) [@The\_Joker\_and\_the\_Thief](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Joker_and_the_Thief)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 5:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/16 "2014-11-16T05:00:38Z")

</div>

> [@beowulff](#):
>
> From the article:  
> Which is why Halogen lamps are still permitted, even though they suck energy, too.

But plain incandescents _are_ banned, because they’ve been around for decades and can’t be made any more efficient, and any claim that they aren’t banned is misleading.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zoid/32/336_2.png) [@zoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoid)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 5:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/17 "2014-11-16T05:02:06Z")

</div>

> [@dorsiflector](#):
>
> [Lights out for incandescent bulbs - nj.com](http://www.nj.com/mercer/index.ssf/2012/02/lights_out_for_incandescent_bu.html)

Your own cite states that incandescent bulbs are not banned but simply must meet new energy standards.  
That’s like saying that when the government sets new MPG standards they’re banning cars.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jeff\_Lichtman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jeff_lichtman/32/1531_2.png) [@Jeff\_Lichtman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jeff_Lichtman)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 5:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/18 "2014-11-16T05:38:30Z")

</div>

> [@dorsiflector](#):
>
> I am paying my electric bill. If I _choose_ to buy an inefficient bulb, and spend my hard-earned money on incandescent light, then why can’t I?
> 
> - Let’s say I buy a Hummer with the biggest engine available, that gets 6MPG. Is the government going to now force me to drive a more fuel efficient vehicle? It’s not the government’s business to regulate the market in this way.

Energy use has a cost to society apart from the cost to you of your electricity bill. A lot of electrical power comes from burning fossil fuels, which contributes to climate change and air pollution. Extraction of fossil fuels causes environmental damage. Hydroelectric power comes from damming rivers, which has its own environmental cost. Nuclear power also has environmental costs (please don’t let this thread turn into an argument about this). I believe it is within the proper role of government to regulate the way you use electricity because it affects other people.

As for your Hummer - the government mandates minimum fuel efficiency for auto makers. The regulations don’t apply to individual vehicles, but to the fleet of vehicles that a manufacturer sells. So for every gas guzzler a car company sells, it has to sell some gas sippers to make up for it. The rationale for this is that your use of fuel affects society as a whole - when you burn gasoline you contribute to air pollution and climate change, and you do some harm to national security by reducing national energy independence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kobal2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kobal2/32/20_2.png) [@Kobal2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kobal2)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 6:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/19 "2014-11-16T06:21:49Z")

</div>

> [@Jeff\_Lichtman](#):
>
> As for your Hummer - the government mandates minimum fuel efficiency for auto makers. The regulations don’t apply to individual vehicles, but to the fleet of vehicles that a manufacturer sells. **So for every gas guzzler a car company sells, it has to sell some gas sippers to make up for it.**

… That’s a profoundly silly way to go at it, innit ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zoid/32/336_2.png) [@zoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoid)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2014, 6:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750/20 "2014-11-16T06:56:08Z")

</div>

> [@Kobal2](#):
>
> … That’s a profoundly silly way to go at it, innit ?

Not really. If that huge SUV that drinks like a fish makes be a buttload of profit I’ll be happy to make sure I also sell some nice eco friendly cars as well so I can keep makin’ those Benjamin’s.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-incandescent-light-bulbs-illegal/704750.md?page=2)
