# Why are LCD TVs more expensive then LCD monitors?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-lcd-tvs-more-expensive-then-lcd-monitors/148970>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [January 16, 2003, 2:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-lcd-tvs-more-expensive-then-lcd-monitors/148970 "2003-01-16T14:35:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 10\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![critter42](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/7ba0ec/32.png) [@critter42](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/critter42)\
**Post date:** [January 16, 2003, 8:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-lcd-tvs-more-expensive-then-lcd-monitors/148970/21 "2003-01-16T20:06:52Z")

</div>

The audio, scan converter, etc is not an issue - Casio’s been putting out those pocket LCD tv’s since the middle 80s, and they had all that - some models even had an AM/FM receiver to boot ([Cite](http://world.casio.com/corporate/history/chronology.html))

Yes I realize there’s a difference in scale - it’s MUCH easier to manufacture 3" LCD screens with 0 dot-defects than it is to manufacture 15" LCD screens with 0 dot-defects (and I also realize the LCD type has changed radically in 20 years, but each advance has only made it _cheaper_ to create higher-quality large LCD screens) but my point is that the basic technology to actually display a TV signal on an LCD screen has been around for 20 years on a consumer lever, so R&D cost for that is nil, and the components needed to accomplish that are, again, of negligible cost.

I think **astro** is on the right track. Those early LCD tv’s had gawdawful viewing angles - an 1/8th of an inch in any direction was enough to kill the picture (and may still be - I haven’t looked at one for 12-13 years now). Viewing angle on PCs is rarely an issue since you’re not going to generally have 3-10 people watching the screen over your shoulder, or if you are, they’ll be right behind you and not more than 10-15 degrees (20-30 degrees total) either way. In a typical living room setting, you could conceivably have people spread as much as, oh say 50-60 degrees each way (100-120 degrees total). A TV that requires you to be almost right in front of the TV just wouldn’t go over well (this is the reason why projection TVs didn’t take off like was expected - they sold well enought I suppose, but I think some people were predicting that EVERYONE would have 60" projection TVs by now).

critter42

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![handy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b5a626/32.png) [@handy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/handy)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2003, 12:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-lcd-tvs-more-expensive-then-lcd-monitors/148970/22 "2003-01-17T00:02:50Z")

</div>

I don’t get the point of a LCD TV when you can use a tv tuner card in your PC & use your PC as a LCD… But its easier if your LCD TV has a RF or a/v input, I suppose.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![banks](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/278dde/32.png) [@banks](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/banks)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2003, 12:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-lcd-tvs-more-expensive-then-lcd-monitors/148970/23 "2003-01-17T00:20:40Z")

</div>

One difference I’ve noticed, as the owner of both a LCD monitor and an LCD TV, is how much brighter the TV is. I’m not sure if this would affect the price so drastically, though. I think the main cause must be supply and demand, as well as the presence of the OEM market for LCD monitors.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![handy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b5a626/32.png) [@handy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/handy)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2003, 4:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-lcd-tvs-more-expensive-then-lcd-monitors/148970/24 "2003-01-17T16:41:45Z")

</div>

banks, how near are you to the tv? If you are farther then from a computer LCD, would that explain more brightness on the tv?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grither](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/grither/32/425_2.png) [@Grither](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grither)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2003, 6:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-lcd-tvs-more-expensive-then-lcd-monitors/148970/25 "2003-01-17T18:44:27Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by handy \*  
> \*\*banks, how near are you to the tv? If you are farther then from a computer LCD, would that explain more brightness on the tv? \*\*

I think maybe you’ve got that backwards, **handy**. The designers know that you’re likely to be a lot farther from the television than your monitor, and so design it much brighter to make up for the distance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jasg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f0a364/32.png) [@jasg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jasg)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2003, 2:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-lcd-tvs-more-expensive-then-lcd-monitors/148970/26 "2003-01-19T02:41:08Z")

</div>

In addition to LCD monitors, [ViewSonic](http://www.viewsonic.com/products/video_box_vb50hrtv.htm) also sells a cool $100 TV Tuner than includes the line doubler circuitry.

Turns your monitor into a flat screen tv. It has a remote too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![banks](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/278dde/32.png) [@banks](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/banks)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2003, 5:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-lcd-tvs-more-expensive-then-lcd-monitors/148970/27 "2003-01-19T05:59:47Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by handy \*  
> \*\*banks, how near are you to the tv? If you are farther then from a computer LCD, would that explain more brightness on the tv? \*\*

Actually, before posting, I did a nice little (absolutely non-rigorous) experiment, to see if my hunch was true. I put both monitors on my desk, and sat across the room and played with the brightness setting on each.  
The brightness of the LCD TV, at maximum brightness, was about half again that of the monitor. Now, this is only a subjective measurement. However, it’s better than nothing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![handy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b5a626/32.png) [@handy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/handy)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2003, 4:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-lcd-tvs-more-expensive-then-lcd-monitors/148970/28 "2003-01-19T16:32:02Z")

</div>

“I put both monitors on my desk, and sat across the room and played with the brightness setting on each.”

How did you do the audio on that lcd tv?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Urban\_Ranger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Urban\_Ranger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Urban_Ranger)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2003, 4:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-lcd-tvs-more-expensive-then-lcd-monitors/148970/29 "2003-01-19T16:39:52Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by astro \*  
> Beyond the items already mentioned, based on my eyeballing them at the local Circuit City, I believe the LCD TV’s typically had a _substantially_ wider viewing angle than the LCD PC monitors.

I don’t think so. Top notch LCD monitors have excellent viewing angles. Philips claims 170° it’s probably not true, you don’t get that even on a CRT.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![astro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9dc877/32.png) [@astro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/astro)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2003, 4:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-lcd-tvs-more-expensive-then-lcd-monitors/148970/30 "2003-01-19T16:53:31Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Urban Ranger \*  
> \*\*I don’t think so. Top notch LCD monitors have excellent viewing angles. Philips claims 170° it’s probably not true, you don’t get that even on a CRT. \*\*

I was just in Circuit City last night and checked this out. Based purely on direct observation the angle (with useful brightness and clarity) of the LCD TV’s was noticeably wider than the LCD PC monitors and the LCD TV screen was brighter and more umm… “intense”. The LCD PC monitors could be viewed at wide angles but the images were not as clear and pristine at wide angles compared to the LCD TVs. Just my observation though. They were not side by side and the lighting in the TV section was not as high as in the PC section so viewing conditions were not equivalent.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-lcd-tvs-more-expensive-then-lcd-monitors/148970.md?page=1)
